ASK FATHER: “Why isn’t the Male Only Holy Orders a Dogma?”

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

There’s something I’ve been wondering about for years. Why isn’t the Male Only Holy Orders a Dogma? It seems like since 1994 it’s been declared that all Catholics must accept this. Could a Pope come along and eventually declare that it’s a Dogma of the Catholic Church?

You are perhaps reacting to the latest antics of the “walking together” in Ireland and the appointment of women who support the ordination of women to certain Vatican entities.

Short answer. It. Can’t. Happen. As Lumen gentium clarifies, the Sacrament of Holy Orders is one sacrament, not three. If women cannot be ordained to the priesthood, they can’t be ordained deacons either, much less priests.

We can spin this out a bit more.

There is a distinction between dogma, doctrine, and infallibility. A teaching does not have to be solemnly defined ex cathedra by a Pope to be infallible and irreformable.

In his 1994 Apostolic Letter Ordinatio sacerdotalis, John Paul II said:

“I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful.”

Notice the wording. The Pope did not say that the Church chooses, for the time being, to ordain only men. He said that the Church has no authority whatsoever to ordain women. The matter is beyond the Church’s competence to change.

Should anyone try, that’s a sure sign that something is deeply wrong.

Subsequently, in 1995 the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under Cardinal Ratzinger answered a formal dubium (question) about the authority of Ordinatio sacredotalis. It explained that the doctrine requires definitive assent because it has already been taught infallibly by the Church’s ordinary and universal Magisterium.  In other words, it is not necessary to make, now, a formal pronouncement that it is infallible teaching, because it has always been infallible.

NB: There are truths formally proposed as divinely revealed (de fide credenda) and teachings definitively to be held (de fide tenenda). Both require assent, although their precise theological classifications differ.

Could a future Pope formally define the reservation of priestly ordination to men as a dogma of divine and Catholic faith?

Yes. Absolutely.  It isn’t necessary, but sure.

In fact, the CDF’s 1998 Doctrinal Commentary on the Concluding Formula of the Professio Fidei (par 11), explicitly addresses this possibility:

“This does not foreclose the possibility that, in the future, the consciousness of the Church might progress to the point where this teaching could be defined as a doctrine to be believed as divinely revealed.”

Such a definition would give the doctrine a further formal clarification concerning its status as revealed truth. It would not make the teaching any more binding, nor would it introduce something new into the deposit of faith.  The restriction of priestly ordination to men is already infallibly taught, definitive, and irreformable.

It cannot be overturned by a future Pope or by an ecumenical council, much less a season of “walking together”.

In short, a future Pope could solemnly define what the Church already holds definitively, but he could never legitimately declare the opposite.

The Pope is the guardian of the sacraments instituted by Christ, not their master. He cannot rewrite their essential constitution according to the theological fashions of the day.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged
Leave a comment

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 32: All Saints

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 32: All Saints

For this 305th day of the calendar year, the Feast of All Saints – which bumps the Sunday though in the Vetus Ordo it gets a commemoration (something the Novus Ordo does not have) the sun rose over Rome at 06:40.

It set at 17:07 while we were singing 2nd Vespers, a rather long affair tonight because at the Magnificat all 8 of the side altars (including those in the transepts) were to be incensed.

The 17:30 Ave Maria Bell cycle is still indicated for the Curia.

Thus we begin the month dedicated to prayers for the dead.

Before Vespers we had a solemn exposition of the sacred relics which The Parish lovingly guards.   I made videos from two directions of the whole thing and, along with some still photos, hope to get it edited together soon.   There is, by the way, in the traditional calendar, coming up a Feast of Holy Relics.

This morning many of the relics were on the St. Matthew altar in the transept, ready for the afternoon.

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 32: All Saints

Getting a deacon ready for Mass this morning.  Rather like how they dress astronauts.

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 32: All Saints

I just got a photo from The World’s Best Sacristan™ who is setting up altars for tomorrow morning when priests will be able to celebrate THREE Requiem Masses (but only keep one stipend).

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 32: All Saints

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 32: All SaintsPlease remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

ACTION ITEM! 1-8 November PLENARY INDULGENCE for the Poor Souls

ACTION ITEM! 1-8 November PLENARY INDULGENCE for the Poor SoulsNovember is the month dedicated especially to the Holy Souls in Purgatory. Holy Mother Church, who never forgets her suffering children, gives us an opportunity during the first eight days of November to come to their aid by obtaining plenary indulgences applicable to the faithful departed.

Through the Church’s treasury of spiritual goods, we can do something concrete for souls who can no longer merit for themselves. They are saved. They will certainly someday attain the Beatific Vision. However, they must first undergo whatever purification remains necessary before entering the presence of God.  Only the pure see God.

They need our help.  And we, who are still making our way through this vale of tears, can help them.

From 1 November through 8 November, the Church grants a plenary indulgence, applicable to the souls in Purgatory, to the faithful who devoutly visit a cemetery and pray for the departed. The prayer may even be entirely mental. You don’t need a special formula, although the traditional Requiem aeternam is easy and fitting.

On 2 November, All Souls’ Day, there is another indulgenced work: devoutly visit a church or oratory and recite there the Our Father and the Creed. The usual conditions apply. This indulgence, too, is applicable only to the departed.

The local Bishop or Ordinary can permit the church-visit indulgence to be obtained instead on All Saints’ Day or the preceding or following Sunday.

For the norms governing these indulgences, see the Enchiridion Indulgentiarum, concession 29, and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1471–1479.

NB: These indulgences are specifically for the dead. You cannot apply them to yourself. Normally, only one plenary indulgence may be gained per day, so the existence of two indulgenced works on All Souls’ Day does not mean that you can gain two plenary indulgences that day.

What are the usual conditions?

Along with performing the indulgenced work, you must:

  1. Be in the state of grace, with at least the general intention of gaining the indulgence.
  2. Make a sacramental Confession.
  3. Receive Holy Communion.
  4. Pray for the intentions from the Roman Pontiff. An Our Father and a Hail Mary suffice.
  5. Be free from all attachment to sin, even venial sin.

That last condition might seem very hard.

Being detached from all sin does not mean that you have already achieved sinless perfection. It means that you sincerely reject every sin and have no deliberate affection for any sin, however small at the time of the indulgenced work. We must be willing to surrender even those familiar little sins to which we have grown embarrassingly attached.  This is not an impossible ideal.  The Church doesn’t ask the impossible.  You can do this, but it could take some time and discipline, many examinations of conscience and many fervent Acts of Faith, Hope, and Charity.

A few practical points.

One good sacramental Confession can suffice for several plenary indulgences. You do not have to go to Confession eight days in a row. The Confession, Communion and prayers can be fulfilled within several days before or after the indulgenced work. It is fitting, especially for Communion and prayer for the Pope’s intentions, that these take place on the day of the cemetery visit.

If the full conditions for a plenary indulgence are not fulfilled, the indulgence is partial, provided the conditions for gaining a partial indulgence are present.

A word about indulgences, because Protestant polemics and, alas, from inadequate Catholic catechesis.

An indulgence does not forgive sins. Sins are forgiven through the mercy of God, ordinarily in the Sacrament of Penance when mortal sin is involved. Nevertheless, even after the guilt of sin and its eternal punishment have been remitted, temporal punishment can remain.  Out of justice, something has to be done about satisfaction.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church explains in CCC 1471 that an indulgence is the remission before God of temporal punishment due to sins whose guilt has already been forgiven. A plenary indulgence remits all of that temporal punishment. A partial indulgence remits some of it.

Christ entrusted to His Church the authority to dispense these spiritual benefits from the inexhaustible treasury of His merits and those of His saints. This belongs to the mysterious and consoling reality of the Communion of Saints.

We are bound together in Christ. The saints in glory intercede for us. We on earth pray for one another and for the departed. The souls in Purgatory benefit from the suffrages of the faithful, especially the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

The souls in Purgatory cannot go to Confession again. They cannot attend Mass and receive Communion as we can. They cannot make a pilgrimage to a cemetery and gain an indulgence for themselves. Their earthly time of meriting has ended.

But we can act on their behalf.

Some of those souls may have no one left on earth who remembers them. Their names have disappeared from family conversations. Their graves are neglected. Perhaps nobody has prayed for them in decades.

God knows them. Holy Church remembers them.

We should remember them, too.

How might you do this?  Find a cemetery. Go there and pray for the dead. If possible, attend Holy Mass and receive Communion. Make a good Confession. Make an honest effort to detach yourself from every sin.  Do this each day from 1 through 8 November, if you can.

And don’t stop praying for the dead when 8 November has passed. The whole month of November is a time to pray for the dead in a special way.  A devout cemetery visit with prayer for the departed on other days of the year carries a partial indulgence. That’s not nothing!

We pray for the Poor Souls now. Someday, unless we go directly to Heaven, we may be among them, longing for the prayers of those whom we have left behind.

Memento mori.

And perform the spiritual work of mercy of praying for the dead.

Requiem aeternam dona eis, Domine, et lux perpetua luceat eis. Requiescant in pace. Amen.

Eternal rest grant unto them, O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon them. May they rest in peace. Amen.

GO TO CONFESSION.

PRAY FOR THE DEAD.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ACTION ITEM!, Four Last Things | Tagged ,
1 Comment

What Does The Prayer (Hymn) Really Say? “Placáre, Christe, sérvulis”

Tonight at Solemn Vespers for the Feast of All Saints, we were treated with a vision of the heavenly court as we sang the hymn after the psalms (the traditional location unlike the post-Conciliar Liturgy of the Hours). The hymn presents angels, the Apostles, the Prophets, the Martyrs, the Confessors, the Virgins, the men and women who sought God in the wilderness. They fought the good fight and, by God’s grace, attained the patria, the heavenly homeland toward which we are still making our pilgrimage.

Let’s drill into the hymn Placáre, Christe, sérvulis… Be appeased, O Christ, toward Thy little servants.

The hymn is comprised of seven four-line stanzas, with eight syllables to each line: 8.8.8.8. Its meter is iambic dimeter, a familiar vehicle of Latin hymnody. An iamb moves from a short to a long syllable (˘ —). Four iambic feet supply the eight syllables of the line. The classical quantitative pattern is important, but the sung hymn also has the accentual rhythms of ecclesiastical Latin. Syllable length and word stress are different things.

There’s an interesting textual history. The older hymn began “Christe, Redemptor omnium, conserva tuos famulos… O Christ, Redeemer of all, preserve Thy servants.” It is sometimes attributed to Rabanus Maurus (+856), though that attribution is uncertain. The editors of the Roman hymns under Urban VIII (+1644), with their narrow taste for classical metrical exactatude, reworked it so extensively that Placáre, Christe, sérvulis is practically a new composition. The older text has been restored to modern forms of the Liturgy of the Hours. Our hymn here is the traditional Roman Breviary version.

Let’s look at the whole hymn. I’ve given an intentionally literal translation rather than attempting an English verse translation. The third column notes some relevant scriptural and theological connections.

LATIN (accented) LITERAL ENGLISH NOTES / SCRIPTURE
Placáre, Christe, sérvulis,
quibus Patris cleméntiam
tuae ad tribúnal grátiae
patróna Virgo póstulat.
Be appeased, O Christ, toward Thy little servants, for whom the Virgin Patroness asks the Father’s clemency at the tribunal of Thy grace. Hebrews 4:16: the throne of grace. John 2:1–11: the Virgin’s intercession at Cana. Sérvulis: little servants; tribúnal grátiae: the tribunal of grace.
Et vos, beáta per novem
distíncta gyros ágmina,
antíqua cum praeséntibus,
futúra damna péllite.
And you, blessed hosts divided into nine circles, drive away harms of the past together with those of the present, and harms yet to come. Psalm 90(91):11; Daniel 7:10; Apocalypse 5:11. The nine choirs of Angels: cf. St. Thomas, ST I, q. 108.
Apóstoli cum Vátibus,
apud sevérum Iúdicem
veris reórum flétibus
expóscite indulgéntiam.
Apostles together with Prophets, obtain pardon before the stern Judge through the genuine tears of the guilty. Ephesians 2:20: Apostles and Prophets. Psalm 50(51):19: a contrite heart. James 5:16: the effective prayer of the just. Reórum: of the accused or guilty.
Vos, purpuráti Mártyres,
vos, candidáti praemio
confessiónis, éxsules
vocáte nos in pátriam.
You, purple-clad Martyrs, and you, clothed in white with the reward of confession, call us exiles into our homeland. Apocalypse 7:9, 14: the white robes, washed in the Lamb’s blood. Philippians 3:20: our citizenship is in heaven. Salve Regina: éxsules fílii Hevae.
Choréa casta Vírginum,
et quos erémus íncolas
transmísit astris, caelitum
locáte nos in sédibus.
Chaste company of Virgins, and you whom the wilderness, as its inhabitants, sent to the stars, place us in the dwellings of the heavenly citizens. Matthew 19:12; Apocalypse 14:4; John 14:2. Erémus: the desert; caélites: citizens of heaven. Transmísit astris poetically indicates passage to heaven.
Auférte gentem pérfidam
credéntium de fínibus,
et unus omnes únicum
ovíle nos Pastor regat.
Remove the faithless people from the boundaries of the believers, and may one Shepherd govern all of us as one flock. John 10:16: one flock, one Shepherd; Ephesians 4:4–6. Pérfidam: faithless or treacherous. The petition’s end is the preservation and unity of Christ’s flock.
Deo Patri sit glória,
Natóque Patris único,
Sancto simul Paráclito,
in sempitérna saécula.
Amen.
Glory be to God the Father, and to the Father’s only-begotten Son, and likewise to the Holy Paraclete, unto everlasting ages. Amen. Matthew 28:19. The hymn ends in Trinitarian praise. The saints’ intercession leads back to the glory of the Triune God.

There is an interesting movement through these seven stanzas. We begin at the tribunal of Christ with Our Lady asking mercy. Then our singing eyes pass over the angelic orders and the ranks of the blessed, from the foundation stones of Apostles and Prophets through the blood of Martyrs, the steadfast witness of Confessors, and the purity and self-denial of Virgins and hermits. We end by praying that Christ’s flock remain under one Shepherd, and finally in the praise of the Most Holy Trinity. The Church Triumphant intercedes for the Church Militant.

Notice the very first word: Placáre, a present passive imperative of placo, “to appease, to reconcile, to make favorable.” We ask Christ to be graciously disposed toward sérvulis, a diminutive of servus, “little servants.” There is both humility and affection in that diminutive. The opening is also striking for its hyperbaton structure: we have to reach the end of the stanza before the subject patróna Virgo, “the Virgin Patroness,” appears. She asks the Father’s clemency for us “ad tribúnal grátiae… at the tribunal of Christ’s grace”. Tribunal is a judicial word. Compare Hebrews 4:16, which bids us approach the throne of grace with confidence.

The second stanza turns to the nine ranks of blessed spirits. “Per novem distincta gyros agmina” describes the heavenly hosts arranged in nine circles or orders. The traditional enumeration, developed especially in Pseudo-Dionysius and was elaborated by St. Thomas Aquinas (cf. STh I, q. 108). These mighty beings are asked to drive away “antíqua cum praeséntibus, futúra damna… evils past, present and future”. The expression spreads their protective concern across the whole of our embattled earthly life.

Next come the Apostles with the Prophets. They are asked to obtain indulgéntiam “pardon or remission”, before the sevérum Iúdicem, “the stern or exacting Judge”. Note “veris reórum flétibus… the genuine tears of the guilty.”  There must be real repentance. The saints pray that such sinners obtain mercy. The communion of saints cannot make repentance unnecessary.  Rather, their intercession helps sinners to repent and to persevere as they did.

Then comes a great contrast. The Martyrs are purpuráti, clad in purple, in the royal color of blood shed for Christ. The Confessors are candidáti, clothed in gleaming white on account of the reward of their faithful confession. Purple and white. Blood and perseverance. Different forms of witness but one and the same heavenly victory. What do we ask? “Éxsules vocáte nos in pátriam… Call us, exiles, into our homeland.” Think of the  Salve Regina. We are still in exile, though we are already, through baptism, citizens of heaven (Philippians 3:20). I can’t help but think of ancient Roman political and forensic imagery. A man running for office would wear a plain toga, white (candida) from chalk. A senator would wear a white toga with a broad purple stripe. Each indicates service of the patria, which means service to others.

The next stanza introduces the chaste company of Virgins, then those whom the desert sent heavenward. Erémus is the wilderness, the desert, the place where the ancient ascetics fought the devil, themselves, and the disordered appetites of fallen nature. We ask these saints to “locáte nos in sédibus caelitum… to place us among the dwelling places of the heavenly citizens.” Think of John 14:2: “In my Father’s house there are many mansions.”

There is a hard-edged petition in the sixth stanza: Auferte gentem pérfidam credéntium de fínibus. In this context pérfidam means faithless or, depending on the context, treacherous. Read within the hymn’s prayer for the Church’s preservation and unity, the petition asks that what is hostile to faith be removed from the bounds of the faithful. The following lines give its positive object: “Et unus omnes únicum ovíle nos Pastor regat… And may one Shepherd govern us all as one flock.” The allusion is plainly to John 10:16. The final goal is unity under Christ the Shepherd, with all called to enter His fold.

The repeated thought of patria (“fatherland”) is especially fitting on All Saints. Those who have reached heaven are not strangers to us. Patria implies that they are our elder brothers and sisters in the household of God. They know the way because, with grace, they have traveled it. They have fought their battles and now reign with Christ. We are asking them to help us reach the same destination.

The juxtaposted images sevérus Iúdex with tribúnal grátiae are consoling. God is just, so accountability is necessary. But mercy is real, too, and so is the intercession of those who see Him face to face. The Feast of All Saints is therefore a summons to examine our consciences, conversion, an invitation to hope, and a reminder that Heaven is where we are supposed to be going is not to be presumed.

Now that we have pried open the text, let’s hear it.

Play video

Posted in PRAYERCAzT: What Does The (Latin) Prayer Really Sound L, WDTPRS | Tagged ,
Leave a comment

If you are a priest or seminarian, this is your immediate homework. A judicial decision from the Roman Rota roundly condemned publishing lists of “credibly accused” clerics.

My good friend Michael Mazza, a hero canonist and also civil lawyer who defends priests, posted at Catholic World Report about a judicial decision from the Roman Rota which roundly condemned the practice of publishing lists of “credibly accused” clerics.  The Rota is the rough equivalent of the Catholic Church’s Supreme Court in such matters.  Mazza is an expert on, inter alia, the right we have to a good reputation.    This is a longish and dense piece, but worth reading.  It is highly instructive.

If you are a priest or seminarian, this is your immediate homework.

 

Posted in Canon Law, Priests and Priesthood |
1 Comment

Your Sunday Sermon Notes – All Saints (Vetus Ordo and Novus Ordo)

Your Sunday Sermon Notes – All Saints (Vetus Ordo and Novus Ordo)

My Sunday Mass intention today is for my benefactors, those of you who donate regularly, ad hoc, or send things.

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for this Feast of All Saints in the Vetus Ordo and in the Novus Ordo?

Tell us about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

A taste of what I offered at 1 Peter 5 this week.

[…]

God granted us the privilege of venerating the merits of all His saints “sub una celebritate”, under one solemn celebration by a vast throng. Having gathered them together in our liturgical observance, we invoke them together in our petition. Hence our intercessors are multiplied, “multiplicatis intercessoribus”.  We ask Almighty God to pour out upon us the abundance of His mercy.  The saints are our force multipliers.  They are highly motivated and want for us the joy they have for God’s greater glory.

We can squeeze the Collect for more. Tribuisti, “you have granted,” recalls God’s generosity in the past, while largiaris, “may You bestow,” petitions His generosity in the present. The whole prayer moves from the gift already received to the greater gift now requested. We honor the merits of all the saints together and, precisely because we have so many heavenly advocates, we implore a more abundant share in God’s propitiatory mercy.  Heaven is our force multiplier here and now!

[…]

 

Posted in Sermons | Tagged
1 Comment

MAIL CALL: A note about St. Expeditus and an online shrine

From a reader…

Hello Father — your St. Expeditus piece delighted me: the saint hidden inside the Collect’s own word, ‘expediti’ — unencumbered, freed for God’s work — with his HODIE cross raised over the crow still croaking ‘cras.’ Few explain him so well, or so wittily. I’m a lifelong devotee and I’ve built a small free online shrine in his honor — https://saintexpediteblessings.org (prayers, novena, petition wall — a real candle lit for every petition — testimonies, virtual chapel; all free, nothing sold). I only wanted you to know it exists. One question: besides social media, how would you suggest getting the word out about a site like this? I’d value your advice. Hodie!

Thanks for letting my know about this.

There is something personally compelling about this saint.  I’m not sure exactly what it is.  Maybe I’ll think about it tomorrow.

Anyway, I think what the sender was referencing was something I posted at One Peter Five for which I write a weekly commentary on the upcoming Vetus Ordo Sunday Masses.  In this case it was for the 19th Sunday of Pentecost in early October, just after I got to Rome for my rapidly dissipating sojourn.  The Collect for that Sunday had the word expediti, which always makes me think of St. Expeditus.  This is some of what I wrote:

The Collect [19th Sunday] is eloquent and dense:

Omnipotens et misericors Deus,
universa nobis adversantia propitiatus exclude:
ut mente et corpore pariter expediti,
quae tua sunt, liberis mentibus exsequamur.

Do you see those “ex-”s along the way?

LITERAL VERSION

Almighty and merciful God,
graciously shut out all things that oppose us,
so that, equally unencumbered in mind and body,
we may carry out with free minds the things that are Yours.

The Church asks for freedom because there is something to be done. The oration addresses both mind and body, since both are involved in our obedience.  There is an ascending progress in those exclude… expediti… exsequamur.  Exclude (“put out”) remove what opposes us is the first step.  The next step is in expediti, that is, an eagerness to go after godly things (quae tua sunt).  Finally, we fall into step with God’s will and follow Him in exsequamur.

Whenever this Collect comes around, I am reminded of the 4th c. martyr St. Expeditus, a Roman centurion. He is depicted in his soldier’s armor holding a martyr’s palm branch and raising high a sign with the Latin word HODIE, “today” while as his feet a black crow onomatopoetically croaks out CRAS “tomorrow”.  Moreover, in Latin military terminology, the expediti were soldiers unencumbered by baggage and ready to move swiftly. That is the force of expediti in the Collect: freed from what hinders us, we are ready to carry out God’s will. That gives us an image for the Christian life, especially as the days of the liturgical year grow shorter.  We must put off what holds us back and put on what aids us.

Pius Parsch observes in The Church’s Year of Grace that this Sunday opens a sequence concerned with Christian hope. Hope has its eyes on the destination. It keeps a man moving toward it. The Collect asks God to make us fit for the journey. Hence, we of the Church Militant have sins to confess, habits to amend, people to forgive, duties to perform, and so forth. A soldier who means to march forward cannot remain forever occupied with packing and unpacking his burdens.

Have you been to confession lately?

Hodie, non cras: today, rather than tomorrow. God gives us the present in which to respond in freedom to grace.

 

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
Leave a comment

ROME 26/10 – Day 31: Blast from the … present!

I have a new Substack post about the Feast of All Saints.


ROME 26/10 – Day 31: Blast from the ... present!

06:13 was the Sunrise in Rome and sunset was at 19:08

The Curia’s Ave Mari Bell is still in the 1730 cycle.

It is the vigil of All Saints.

Welcome Registrants:

ian33
Miss

Happy Saturday indeed.

There’s movement on the WHITE VESTMENT RESTORATION PROJECT to which some of you made generous contributions.

To recap, The Parish™ is in possession of stupendous but now delicate and compromised white and gold vestments for Solemn Mass.  It had been long desired to restore them for use, but the money was lacking.  Some of YOU stepped up.  We had to raise the funds to cover the work and the IVA before the specialist (in Genova) would take up the task.   There is now movement now that his calendar is cleared.  The vestments have been delivered and the work has started.  It has, so far, been hard to get any photos. I hope that will change.   Here are a few pics of the precious things being moved and examined.

In the first one, you can see on the far vestment case RED chalice veils for vestments set out for priests’ Masses that, again, some of YOU, provided!   It’s quite a sight to see all the side altars with priests with matching red and gold.

ROME 26/10 – Day 31: Blast from the ... present! ROME 26/10 – Day 31: Blast from the ... present! ROME 26/10 – Day 31: Blast from the ... present! ROME 26/10 – Day 31: Blast from the ... present! ROME 26/10 – Day 31: Blast from the ... present!

It’ll take a while, but it is happening.

From the past… no… now anywhere the TLM is sung.

Play video

I hope this convent survives!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Is the needle moving?

There is an interesting seesaw going on between an Algerian Cardinal and an American Bishop.

First, you may have noted that Cardinal Jean-Paul Vesco, the archbishop of Algiers, Algeria, said: “We are the Church of this people. Not a proselytizing Church, not a Church that is there to convert, but a Church that aspires to be one of the components of this people.” He further asserted that “in monotheistic religions, proselytism is poison, because it implies considering the other person’s religion false.” “Do we see ourselves as a besieged fortress? Or do we choose fraternity?” Vesco asked. “For me, it is the only worthwhile option.”

Bishop Robert Barron, who needs no introduction, pushed back saying:

“Last time I checked, the Founder said, ‘All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.’ Sure sounds like conversion to me,” Barron noted.

“When St. Paul came to Corinth or Athens or Thessalonica, his purpose was not to listen or to form a discussion group but rather to declare an unnerving message: the euangelion (glad tidings) that Jesus Christ is risen from the dead.”

Is the needle moving?“So impassioned is he for this work that he says, ‘I have become all things to all people, that I might by all means save some. I do it all for the sake of the gospel’ (1 Cor. 9:22); and ‘If I proclaim the gospel, this gives me no ground for boasting, for an obligation is laid on me, and woe to me if I do not proclaim the gospel’ (1 Cor. 9:16)!”

“Moreover, the entire thrust of the Second Vatican Council was toward bringing the Light of Christ to the peoples of the world (Lumen Gentium),” he continued. “And this missionary élan has given rise in the last few decades to the idea of a ‘new evangelization,’ which is to say, a fresh declaration of the Lordship of Christ.”

“Quite obviously, no one thinks that this work of evangelization should be done in a browbeating, overbearing, or disrespectful manner (proselytization), but for God’s sake, let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater,” Barron wrote.

“If I really thought that the Church does not exist to bring people to Christ, then I would resign and get an honest job,” the bishop of Winona-Rochester, Minnesota, concluded.

For which Barron has been awarded a Gold Star.

Vasco has returned the volley with more contradictions.

In an October 30 social media post responding to Bishop Barron, Vesco highlighted the actions of recent popes, including John Paul II’s Assisi meetings, Pope Benedict XVI’s building closer ties with Muslims, Pope Francis’ Abu Dhabi declaration, and Pope Leo XIV’s prayers inside a mosque.

Citing these recent interfaith examples, Vesco declared that believers from the three monotheistic religions (Christians, Jews, Muslims) have “better things to do than try to convert one another” and should instead “respect one another.”

This back and forth is perhaps more revelatory than it could seem on the surface.

We have in one corner the (Francis) Cardinal Vesco and, in the other corner Bp. Barron, malgrè soi, approaches Fidei Defensor. But this is more interesting now because Vesco responded to Barron.

Now we have more than a public disagreement between two hierarchs.  Now we have a public debate, a disputatio. The Leonine and non-Leonine bishops are now coming into the ring and punching and punching back.

This is excellent! And what’s at stake is not parva res, not small stakes. Redemptoris missio of John Paul II is at stake, not to mention the Great Commission.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but although some few like Bp. Schneider have publicly criticized Francis’/Leo’s decisions (e.g., TLM, Synodality – “walking together”), we have not yet had a public debate involving these issues, wherein two principals have criticized each other so specifically. It reminds me of Burke v Kasper some years ago, where the “current magisterium” was at issue and even Ratzinger v Kasper.  Remember when Sodano went after Ratzinger on Dominus Iesus and John Paul had to referee it, I think in an Angelus address?

The venerable and ancient practice of ecclesiastical disputatio, such as what St. Augustine engaged in, helped to clarify Church teachings (and purge heresies). Recently this has been curtailed. Card. Burke criticized the organization of consistories under Leo for this particular missing element. Sitting around tables with the contemporary equivalent of newsprint redolent of seminary formation and clergy conferences is no way to bring sharp, sometimes even intelligent debates to the forefront. Instead decisions and outcomes are hyper-managed by men pulling levers behind the curtain.

If public debates, albeit through social media, are going to become more frequent and vociferous, then the needle is moving.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged ,
25 Comments

ASK FATHER: If a priest explains away a mortal sin, and the penitent believes him, is the absolution valid?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

If a priest explains away a mortal sin in confession in such away that neither the priest nor the penitent believes any more than the mortal sin is even a sin, is the confession still valid as long as the priest absolves with the required form?

So, objectively, it is a mortal sin.  What is the subjective dimension?

Would the absolution be valid, as described above? Not necessarily.

The correct form of absolution alone does not guarantee a valid absolution. The penitent must have at least imperfect contrition (attrition – fear of Hell rather than more perfect sorrow for offending God) and a genuine purpose of amendment (according to the Council of Trent).

If a priest wrongly assures a penitent that an objectively grave sin is not sinful, two possibilities might be teased out.

First, the penitent acts in good faith, genuinely repents of other sins, and has a firm purpose of amendment. The absolution could still be valid despite the erroneous moral advice.  (I’d hate to be that priest at judgment time.)

Second, the penitent – not really being wholly convinced but because of what the priest said knowingly doesn’t repent of the grave sin, intending to continue committing it – oh my.  The necessary disposition is absent, and absolution is invalid.

NB: A priest cannot make a sin permissible by declaring it so. (Neither can a priest or a pope make something permissible into a sin by declaring that it is.)  Father’s erroneous counsel does not automatically invalidate absolution, but neither can the correct formula compensate for a penitent’s deliberate refusal to repent.

As for a priest who deliberately explains away grave sin in the confessional, he has grotesquely misunderstood his office. The confessional is a tribunal of mercy for the guilty, not a white washing service. The confessor is charged with helping sinners obtain forgiveness, not persuading them that they have nothing to be forgiven for. Such a priest risks sending souls away falsely informed, malformed, in spiritual peril.

I am mindful of the dense and ever useful Act of Faith:

O my God, I firmly believe that Thou art one God in Three Divine Persons, Father, Son and Holy Ghost. I believe that Thy Divine Son became Man, and died for our sins, and that He will come to judge the living and the dead. I believe these and all the truths which the Holy Catholic Church teaches, because Thou hast revealed them, Who canst neither deceive nor be deceived.

God cannot be deceived!   If a person has a doubt about whether or not what he is thinking about doing is a good thing to do, he shouldn’t do it.

Let’s spin that out a bit, because it is at the heart of this scenario.

We should not deliberately act while entertaining a genuine, unresolved practical doubt about whether the contemplated action is sinful. To do so is shows a willingness to offend God, even when one is uncertain whether the particular action actually violates His law.  St. Paul gives us the scriptural foundation: Omne autem, quod non est ex fide, peccatum est….For all that is not of faith is sin.” (Romans 14:23)  In context, Paul is discussing someone who doubts whether he may lawfully eat certain foods. The moral principle extends beyond dietary questions, of course. When conscience warns that an action may be sinful, one must resolve that practical doubt before proceeding.

St. Thomas Aquinas explains the binding character of conscience, including an erroneous conscience (STh I-II, q. 19, aa. 5–6). Someone who chooses to act against what he judges to be God’s law sins by that very choice, even if his understanding of the particular law is mistaken.

So, we mustn’t knowingly act with an unresolved practical doubt of conscience.  Neither do we have to reach absolute certainty about every moral decision. Moral certainty, including that attained through sound moral principles and trustworthy counsel, suffices.

There is an important spiritual point here, especially if someone is tempted to shop around for a confessor who will give the desired answer. The question must be, “What does God require of me?”, rather than “Which priest will tell me that what I want to do is not a sin?”

A confessor who dispels genuine doubt by sound teaching serves the penitent well. One who merely silences the warning of conscience, without establishing the truth, risks becoming an accomplice in self-deception.

When there is a genuine reason to suspect that a contemplated action offends God, establish its moral lawfulness before doing it.  That is ordinary, applied prudence, grounded in reverence for God and concern for one’s eternal salvation.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
12 Comments