Fathers! Pay attention. Video of an attack on the Eucharist during Communion at Sunday Mass. Nasty and planned.

Redemptionis Sacramentum, the 2004 Instruction from the Congregation for Divine Worship (in happier times)…

[92.] Although each of the faithful always has the right to receive Holy Communion on the tongue, at his choice, if any communicant should wish to receive the Sacrament in the hand, in areas where the Bishops’ Conference with the recognitio of the Apostolic See has given permission, the sacred host is to be administered to him or her. However, special care should be taken to ensure that the host is consumed by the communicant in the presence of the minister, so that no one goes away carrying the Eucharistic species in his hand. If there is a risk of profanation, then Holy Communion should not be given in the hand to the faithful.

[103.] The norms of the Roman Missal admit the principle that in cases where Communion is administered under both kinds, “the Blood of the Lord may be received either by drinking from the chalice directly, or by intinction, or by means of a tube or a spoon”. As regards the administering of Communion to lay members of Christ’s faithful, the Bishops may exclude Communion with the tube or the spoon where this is not the local custom, though the option of administering Communion by intinction always remains. If this modality is employed, however, hosts should be used which are neither too thin nor too small, and the communicant should receive the Sacrament from the Priest only on the tongue.

[104.] The communicant must not be permitted to intinct the host himself in the chalice, nor to receive the intincted host in the hand. As for the host to be used for the intinction, it should be made of valid matter, also consecrated; it is altogether forbidden to use non-consecrated bread or other matter.

At Holy Family Church in St. Louis Park, MN (where a friend of mine is pastor) an appalling profanation took place.  The pastor clearly has implemented intinction, more than likely as a way of phasing out Communion in the hand.

However, it seems that there is nevertheless danger of profanation when some agitator screwball shows up.   Note the falsity of the person, who first choose to go up near the end of Communion time for greater visibility and who at first knelt as others did.

About 1:05:10 a woman grabs the intinction cup from the ciborium. Shoots it. Holds it up, drops it on the floor, and saunters (with escort) out.  Father quickly moves to clean up whatever of the Precious Blood was on the floor.

We first spot this nasty piece of work at 1:04:30 in the Communion line on the right side of the video.  She, in black top, has a bag slung from left shoulder to right hip.  She is twirling a … flower? daisy? in her right hand as she turns to the right.   Then she reappears at 1:04:43 going to the center where the priest celebrant is about to finish distribution, so she is last.  As the priest is about to give her communion, she abruptly stands, extends the flower to him which he, probably surprised, took with his hand (thus making that hand less “useful”).

Carefully planned.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Perhaps in your goodness, you will perform some act of reparation for this nasty, pre-meditated sacrilege.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
Leave a comment

Wherein Fr. Z and St. Augustine reflect on the Samaritans of the 12th and 13th Sundays after Pentecost (Vetus Ordo) and the danger of false teaching in the Church today

The Gospels for the 12th and 13th Sundays after Pentecost in the Vetus suggests a connection by the fact that they both include Samaritans.

On the 12th Sunday we hear Christ’s parable of the Good Samaritan. The Samaritan is a fictional character within the story. On the 13th Sunday we meet an real Samaritan, one of the ten lepers cleansed by Christ and the only one who returns to give thanks.

Samaritans developed as a community from the population of the 10 tribes of former northern kingdom of Israel, especially around Mount Gerizim, after the Assyrian conquest of 722 BC with whom they intermingled.  They set up their own temple and read only the Pentateuch.  Jews and Samaritans regarded each other with deep hostility.

St. Augustine makes an interesting observation about the Samaritans in the Gospel of Luke.

In his Quaestiones Evangeliorum 2, 19, Augustine reads the parable of the Good Samaritan allegorically. The man descending from Jerusalem to Jericho represents Adam and, in Adam, the whole human race. Jerusalem is the heavenly city from which Adam fell. Jericho signifies mortality. The robbers are the devil and his angels, who strip man of grace and leave him wounded and half dead.  The priest and Levite pass by because the institutions of the Old Law could reveal man’s wounds but could not heal them. Then the Samaritan arrives.

Augustine writes, “Samaritanus custos interpretatur, et ideo ipse Dominus significatur hoc nomine…. Samaritan means ‘guardian,’ and therefore the Lord Himself is signified by this name.”

Christ is the true “Samaritan… Guardian”. He is regarded as a stranger by those who should have recognized Him, yet He alone draws near to fallen humanity. Augustine describes Him as “genere longinquus, misericordia proximus  … distant by race, near by mercy.”

Continuing the allegorical explanation, for Augustine, the Samaritan’s beast – upon which the beaten man in placed – signifies Christ’s human flesh, by which He bears our infirmities. The inn is the Church. The innkeeper represents the apostolic ministry. The two denarii signify the two commandments of charity, love of God and love of neighbor. The promised return of the Samaritan points toward Christ’s return in judgment.

On this Sunday, however, the 13th after Pentecost, the Samaritan who appears in the Gospel reading is not a fictional character in a parable, an allegorical figure of Christ. He is a real man healed by Christ. Ten lepers – one is a Samaritan – cry out for mercy. Ten are cleansed. Only one returns.  The healed Samaritan returns and falls at the feet of Jesus, glorifies God, and gives thanks.

Augustine interprets this episode in Quaestiones Evangeliorum 2, 40. He sees leprosy as an image of false doctrine.  Leprosy produces an unnatural mixture of colors and textures in the body. Similarly, false teaching mixes truth and error within a single discourse.

The result can retain the outward appearance of Christian teaching while being spiritually diseased.

Is this not what we see rampant in certain sectors of the Church today?  Even in some quite lofty places?

False teachers within the Catholic Church don’t announce themselves as enemies of the Faith. They retain Catholic vocabulary while quietly emptying it of definite meaning. For example: “synodality”.  What does that mean?   No one really know.  However, the use of vague terms leads to verbiage of, for example, listening but without any discernable effect or change.  There results chatter about accompaniment but without conversion, mercy but without repentance, conscience but without formation, development but without continuity, and doctrine but without enduring truth.

A great deal of error arrives dressed in fancy vestments.

Returning to Augustine’s interpretation, all ten lepers were cleansed. They represent people who have come to possess true doctrine within the Church. Nevertheless, nine fail to return and give thanks. Sound doctrine, orthodoxy itself, when embraced by pride and ingratitude, remains incomplete.

Augustine says, “Novem itaque indigent uno, ut quadam unitatis forma coagulentur et decem sint… The nine require the one, so that they may be joined together by the form of unity and become ten.”  Ten being a symbol of completeness, perfection.

The nine remain nine because they lack the unity represented by one. The grateful Samaritan, by contrast, signifies the one Church: “Ille qui gratias egit unicae Ecclesiae significatione approbatus atque laudatus est. … He who gave thanks was approved and praised as a figure of the one Church.”

The Samaritan returns to the source of his healing. He attributes the gift to the Giver. He therefore prostrates himself in humility. Thus, Augustine says, he “unitatem regni humili devotione servavit … preserved the unity of the kingdom by humble devotion.”

The fictional Samaritan of the 12th Sunday after Pentecost is Christ healing wounded humanity and carrying it into the Church. The living Samaritan of the 13th Sunday represents the Church returning to Christ in faith and thanksgiving.

Take note that the grateful Samaritan, with the nine who did not return, went on their way in obedience to Christ’s enjoinder to present themselves to the priest in obedience to the Law laid down in Leviticus.   Obedience is a key concept in scene with the ten lepers.

There is also a warning here for our troubled times.

We must resist teachers who mingle Catholic truth with fashionable error. We must study the Faith, receive the sacraments worthily, pray, and hold fast to what the Church has consistently taught, handed down.

At the same time, possession of correct doctrine must lead us back to Christ in humility and gratitude. Otherwise, we may be cleansed of doctrinal leprosy while remaining among the ungrateful nine.

Christ the Samaritan found us wounded beside the road. He bound our wounds, carried us in His flesh, and brought us into the inn of His Church. The only proper response is to return, fall at His feet, and give thanks.

 

Posted in Patristiblogging |
Leave a comment

Daily Rome Shot 1686

I can take a few more Mass intentions – HERE

Think of all the wasted money and time and the negative knock-on effect of downgrading and “modernization” of churches on the faith. So much waste. Such disregard for the sacrifices of the faithful who worked and paid for their churches. Yes, slowly some damage is being rectified. But… so much waste. And for what?

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

Word of the Day… I didn’t know this one.

White to move and mate in TWO.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

In Bay Shore, Long Island, the United American Muslim Association (UAMA) just purchased the historic Monfort Missionaries seminary complex, a 70,000 sq ft building on 14.6 acres, for $5.2 million.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes – 13th Sunday after Pentecost (N.O.: 21st Ordinary)

My Mass intention today is for my benefactors, those of you who donate regularly, ad hoc, or send things.

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for this 13th Sunday after Pentecost in the Vetus Ordo (21st Ordinary Sunday in the Novus Ordo)?

Tell us about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

A taste of what I offered at 1 Peter 5 this week.

[…]

“Go and show yourselves to the priests”, Christ said. The priest would examine a person who had problem and declare the result. In the sacrament of Penance, Christ gives His priests a ministerial role in a far greater cleansing. Hansen’s Disease can destroy sensation, flesh, sight, social standing, and bodily life. Mortal sin kills the supernatural life of the soul. A person can die physically disfigured and, in grace, be bound for Heaven. A person cannot die finally impenitent in mortal sin and possess the beatific vision. The cleansing of sin is therefore a greater miracle of mercy than the restoration of diseased flesh.

The Samaritan teaches us what to do after mercy: return, give glory to God, fall at the feet of Christ, give thanks. Eucharistôn, “giving thanks,” is the Christian posture before grace. At Mass we do this in the supreme act of the Church’s worship. In confession, after absolution, the priest may say, “Go… in peace.” The pattern is deeply Christian: mercy, cleansing, thanksgiving, mission.

[…]

 

Posted in Sermons | Tagged
Leave a comment

A work in progress…

The increasingly valuable Infovaticana has a piece by Martin Grichting (Swiss canonist of the Diocese of Chur) argues that Vatican synodality is anachronistic because it draws laypeople into ecclesiastical structures rather than sending them into civil society.

Vatican II envisioned the laity transforming politics, culture, and social life from within. Synodality (“walking together”) instead risks clericalizing the laity, confusing ecclesial roles, and weakening their proper secular apostolate.

Excerpt (READ the whole thing!):

Synodality suggests to the laity that, when it comes to ecclesiastical and apostolic action in secular reality, only—or primarily—the institutional Church matters. Thus, they wait for the synodal assembly to tell them what they should do. In this way, they fail to realize what their task already is today: to make Jesus Christ—prophet, priest, and king—present in the midst of the fragmented and confusing reality of civil society. And because the current Church leadership is unable to transmit to the laity an appropriate spirituality for this, one that corresponds to their nature, they are drawn into the activity of the hierarchy. From there, they are supposed to collaborate—supposedly—in the Church’s mission. The laity are indiscriminately mixed with the successors of the apostles in the so-called synodal bodies, just as once happened in the Synod of Bishops. This once again ignores the Second Vatican Council. For in LG 10 it had still taught that there is an essential difference between the hierarchical priesthood and the common priesthood. Vatican synodal activists have for years been trying to push for the equalization of clergy and laity also in the particular Churches. The most recent example is the “Notes for the use of Bishops and synodal teams” published at the end of July 2026 by the Apostolic See. This is done with ever more verbiage and greater desperation. And it does not take root, because it does not help the faithful to live their Christianity in today’s world.

As per my brilliant texting group:

1 – Now laity are important only insofar as they are incorporated into decision making

2 – AKA Soviets. “All power to the soviets!”. Places where “the proletariat” votes and decides, meaning endless, pointless talks on pre-ordained outcomes by the puppet masters who have “class consciousness” the oppressed masses still lack because of their ignorance forced on them by reactionary forces

All sorts of clear thinking people are pondering the strategy and tactics driving “walking together”.   It is clear that process process process is a key to whatever the final goal is.

Some thoughts about what could be in the air.

Long term goals: Transformation of the Church into an NGO.
Proximate Goals: Gay marriage and women priests.
Strategy: Rewrite Lumen gentium.
Tactics: 1) Incessant process confusing the roles of clergy. 2) Appointment of a certain kind of bishop both to major sees and smaller for testing for promotion. 3) Ghettoization of Tradition.

Far fetched?

Personal is policy.

LifeSite recounts that Pope Leo “on Tuesday appointed a dozen consultors to the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, including several individuals who have advocated for the “ordination” of women to the priesthood, synodality, changes to the Catholic teaching on sexual morality, and even one with ties to the World Economic Forum (WEF).”

Ghettoization…

Pittsburgh
Charlotte
Tyler
Knoxville
Washington DC
Monterey

Etc.

Moreover.

BUT WAIT…. the Diocese of Tarbes and Lourdes has invited homosexual couples to Lourdes to celebrate Valentine’s Day.  HERE

“The invitation is open to all types of couples—married, unmarried, same-sex…,” explained sanctuary administrator Thierry Castillo. He clarified, however, that the couples will not receive any blessing from the Church.

By the by, how long did the Lourdes Shrine directors insist on keeping the creepy Rupnik “art”? So, they are covering it up now, I hear, before Leo comes. Why now? Why cover and not remove? What’s covered can be uncovered.

UPDATE: From a reader… “Hi Padre- just wanted to clarify, while the Lourdes shrine is exempt from French “ownership” laws, the bishop is still not legally able to remove the Rupnick art because of “landmark” laws, so it was covered, and the rest is about to be covered. He is fighting the legal battle and doesn’t want it up…”

And did you know that the current, official, 2002 3rd editio typica of the Novus Ordo Missale Romanum contains throughout artwork by Rupnik?

So, think about it.  A bishop forbids his priests from using the Missale for the TLM and says, instead, they have to say Mass in Latin with the Missale for the Novus Ordo.  Now Father has to see that “art” from the chapel in the Apostolic Palace in the Missale… on the altar.   Have yourself a nice dollop of moral injury, Father, with your serving of oppression.

(Fathers… keep your previous edition if you have one.)

Posted in Pò sì jiù, SESSIUNCULA, The Coming Storm, The Drill, What are they REALLY saying? |
14 Comments

22 August: Feast of the Immaculate Heart of Mary (Vetus Ordo), Queenship of Mary (Novus Ordo)

On 22 August we observe, in the traditional Roman calendar, the Feast of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.  In the newer calendar it is the Queenship of the Blessed Virgin Mary.

When the angel Gabriel came to Mary he told her that her Son would have the throne of David and that His kingdom would have no end (Luke 1:32-33).

In ancient Israel, the mothers of the House of David’s kings were crowned, addressed as Gebirah, “Great Lady”. They sat beside the throne of their royal sons.

Since our Lord is our King, then His Mother is our Queen.

Mary’s Queenship is intimately tied to the Kingship of her Son.

Her Immaculate Heart beats in harmony with His Sacred Heart, for she conceived her King within her Heart, before she carried Him below her Heart.

There is a lovely hymn at Lauds for this Feast, originally O gloriosa Domina, composed by Venantius Fortunatus (+609) and changed around a bit by Pope Urban VIII in 1632.

This was a favorite hymn of St. Anthony, which his mother would sing to him.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Another version. This is sung by the wonder BEER BREWING MONKS of Norcia!

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Another version.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

There are interesting variations on a disc Hispania & Japan: Dialogues

There comes to mind the faithfulness of the Japanese Catholics even after the hideous persecution from the Tokugawa Shoguns and the absence of missionaries for so long.

Marvelous…  US HERE

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

YouTube playlist HERE

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1685 – items wonderful and appalling

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

This is appalling.

Remember that event in Peru during which an official of the DDF (olim Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) made an offering to the demon Pachamama?  It was a few days back that this was dropped, but the times being what they are, we move on to other things in about 17 minutes.   It seems there was more to that Peruvian event – something of a lead up to Leo’s visit to Peru – than was initially reported.    The Lepanto Institute reports that that communist and trans and sodomite groups were part of it, too.   The post is alarming.

That was awful.  This is great…

Black has a hard to find brilliancy which will lead to a win.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Terrific photos from the annual Assumption Mass in the Cathedral of Philadelphia fostered by Fr. Robert Pasley and Mater Ecclesiae Chapel.  This year my good friend Fr. Frank Foley was the preacher.

And just for fun…

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

20 August – St. Bernard of Clairvaux the “Doctor Mellifluus”

A taste of the image and the fervorino from today’s live Mass stream.

Today is the Feast of St. Bernard of Clairvaux.  He is a Doctor of the Church, nicknamed “Doctor Mellifluus” because of “sweet flowing” of his tongue and teaching. At the age of 20 he entered monastic life at Citeaux in 1111 and right away he helped revive it along with many of his male relatives who entered as well. He was an adviser to Popes, defender of the faith against schism, reformer of the Benedictines, Doctor, eloquent preacher, including for the 2nd crusade. Died in 1153 on 20 August. Bernard is Dante Alighieri’s last guide, in Divine Comedy, as he travels through the Empyrean.[29] Dante’s narrative use of Bernard confirms that the saint was famous at the time for profound mysticism, his devotion to Mary, and his reputation for eloquence.

One of St. Bernard of Clairvaux’s most famous sayings comes from De diligendo Deo:

Causa diligendi Deum, Deus est; modus, sine modo diligere… The reason for loving God is God Himself; the measure is to love without measure” (De diligendo Deo I, 1).

Bernard’s concise formula expresses the logic of Christian charity. God, who is infinite goodness, cannot be loved excessively.

Every earthly love requires proportion and restraint, while love of God admits no upper limit.

St. Thomas Aquinas later cites Bernard’s phrase when teaching that the love of God has no measure because divine goodness itself is immeasurable.

 

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols |
1 Comment

“They can always hurt you more.”

I was looking around on the blog for things I had written about Doctor of the Church St. Bernard of Clairvaux. Today is his feast. I found something I wrote in 2022 about the FACT that…

“They can always hurt you more.”

As I re-read what I wrote, I thought I should re-alert the readership to it. It applies to what we are experiencing today… perhaps even more now than then for reasons that are increasingly obvious.

HERE

Excerpt:

Effeminacy is not the jesuitical limp-handed lisping of a confused boy-man with a streak of sullen teen-age girl purple across his half-shaven skull full of mush.   Women can be effeminate, too.   We want women to be feminine, not effeminate.  We want men to be neither, but rather, both virile and masculine.  Get the distinction?

There is another kind of effeminacy, by the way.  It’s the sort whereby, in defiance of their wiring, they relate to others more as women might than men, thus leading to one of the wisest premonitory insights I ever received from a bishop about clergy: “There are old women of both sexes.”

Another analogy about how some of clergy with power work is: high-school mean-girls in the bathroom.

In any event, they can always hurt you more.  Get ready for another blow upon the bruise.

But that’s okay.  We have to have the fight.  When St. Bernard of Clairvaux (+1153) at Vézelay preached to men to raise troops for Second Crusades, he said…

Posted in Linking Back, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged
4 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1684

Zelle donor “KB” on 15 Aug… thanks. I don’t have an email for you, so I can’t write a thank you note.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

Too long enough.  You would think this was an easy choice.  But, for those making the choice, I guess it wasn’t… for some reason.

This… just another day.

If only…

White to move and mate in 4. Easy.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
10 Comments