Bad news and good news. The Bishop of Camden crushes the TLM. The FSSP will start up in the Diocese of Arlington

First…

I’m informed that the bishop of Camden will suppress the faithful who desire to worship God via the Traditional Latin Mass as of next Sunday (last Mass).

More on that as it develops.

What the heck is going on?

Posted in Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices |
Leave a comment

Bishop of Owensboro crushes people who desire the Traditional Latin Mass, but it’s not his fault! It’s someone else’s fault!

What’s with the bishops of Kentucky?

Remember.  It is always about the people who want the traditional Mass.

DIOCESE OF OWENSBORO

McRaith Catholic Center I
Office of the Bishop
Rev. David Kennedy
Immaculate Conception Parish
‘112 S. Day Street
Earlington, KY 42410

Dear Fr. Kennedy, Thank you for the opportunity to discuss the celebration of the Mass according to the Roman Missal of 1962. I have reviewed my correspondence with the Holy See from 2023 where it was indicated: If after this period of time, you wish to renew the permission you will need to send us a further relatio along with your request. This relatio should contain details of the number of participants at these Masses and it should recount the steps which have been taken to lead the faithful who are attached to the antecedent liturgy towards the celebration of the liturgy according to the liturgical books reformed by decree of the Second Vatican Council and which form the unique expression [Which is only held by the liturgically and historically ignorant.] of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite – As I am unable to demonstrate that this condition has been met, [fetch towels] I have no standing [fetch a basin] to request an extension of the Holy See’s instruction, and I am directing you to not celebrate the Mass according to the Roman Missal of 1962 after June 30, 2026. [In private?  Just him?]
I know [PROOF?  Gratis asseritur gratis negatur.] that in some dioceses the faithful who have shown a preference for the Mass celebrated in Latin have accepted the Novus Ordo Mass celebrated in the Latin language. I trust that between now and July 1, 2026, you can obtain the appropriate Missal of Paul VI in Latin. [Put your money where your mouth is and buy it for them and then come and say it yourself… if you can pronounced three words in Latin in order.] I will grant the singular permission[“permission” is only needed where the bishop is tantamount to a bully] to offer this Mass ad orientem. [So… you permit him to follow the rubrics in the Latin Missal? How generous.]
As we discussed I have permitted nearly a year to pass beyond reception of this consent from the Holy See. I did this in recognition of the death of Pope Francis. I allowed the continuation of the traditional Latin Mass after the election of Pope Leo XIV to see if he would reconsider the matter of the Mass offered in parish churches. After more than a year, and the January Consistory of the College of Cardinals in which they specifically chose not to review Traditionis custodes [fetch a pitcher of water] I feel obligated as bishop to act in accord with the direction of the Holy See. [pour the water over my hands]
For the faithful who may object to this directive you may certainly refer them to me, but please make clear that I am acting in accord with my promise to the Pope, the Bishop of Rome. [towel, please] I am grateful for your ministry to this small and unique community. And I assure you of my prayers for them [I’m sure they believe that] and for you and I kindly ask that you all pray for me.

Sincerely in Christ,

Most Reverend William F. Medley

Bishop of Owensboro

Oh, just say the Novus Ordo in Latin.

It’s enough to make even the partially informed weep with frustration.

Posted in Pò sì jiù, The Drill |
4 Comments

WDTPRS – The Collect for the 12th Ordinary Sunday (Novus Ordo): His Name and Holy Fear, Holy Consolation

This coming Sunday’s Collect is wonderful to sing!

It is stark and lavish, carefully balanced, quintessentially Roman.

This week’s Collect, also in 1962 Missale Romanum for the 2nd Sunday after Pentecost, was in the ancient Gelasian Sacramentary for the Sunday after the Ascension (Thursday).  It is also prayed after the Litany of the Most Holy Name of Jesus.

Sancti nominis tui, Domine,
timorem pariter et amorem
fac nos habere perpetuum,
quia numquam tua gubernatione destituis,
quos in soliditate tuae dilectionis instituis.

The pre-tinkered, pre-Conciliar version gives us “perpetuum:” which indicates how to sing it.  But the colon is in itself meaningful.

Gubernatio means “a steering, piloting of a ship” or “direction, management”, which is where we get the word “government”.   A gubernator is the pilot of a ship.  Perpetuus, a, -um is the adjective for “continuing throughout, continuous, unbroken, uninterrupted; constant,…” etc.

Note the balancing of ideas: timor/amor (fear/love) and instituo/destituo (establish/abandon).    We have a paronomasiac pairing in gubernatione/dilectionis.  We have a homoioteleutonic paring in destituis/institutis  In instituo I hear a “setting down” in the sense of how God made us and by that making He takes us upon Himself.  He has our care and our governance.  God sets us down next to Himself, under His watchful eye, so that we don’t go wrong.  In destituo I hear a “setting down” in the sense of a setting to one side away from Himself, an abandonment of interest.  In gubernatio God is, our pilot, our steersman, keeping his hand on the wheel of our lives.  We are solid because His loving hand is firm.  Were He to abandon us, our ship would wreck and we would be “destitute”.  Amidst the vicissitudes of this world we depend in fear and love on His Holy Name.  We stand in the proper place before God’s fearful glance and under His guiding hand of love only through both love and fear His Name which points to His Person.

In the prelude section or protasis, we have a postponed address (Domine) and an oddly placed imperative (fac – I sometimes calls these command forms, imperatives of humble filial confidence).  The protasis is, like Gaul, divided into three parts, cola (plural of colon), giving us three isocola, which sounds rather like a cold drink on a hot day.  Perpetuum goes with timorem and amorem, in a lovely hyperbaton of separation.  Our pariter et has the impact of “fear and no less love”, which balances seemingly antithetical concepts unless they are informed by the Holy Spirit.

The apodosis comes after the invisible (in the Novus Ordo version) colon.  Here we find the deeper petition.  In the first part we ask God to have equally fear and love of His Holy Name… why?  “Quia… because…” we want the guidance of His providence which must be ground on the stability of fear and love God’s Holy Name (in other words His Person).

Look at it again:

Sancti nominis tui, Domine,
timorem pariter et amorem
fac nos habere perpetuum,
(:)
quia numquam tua gubernatione destituis,
quos in soliditate tuae dilectionis instituis.

LITERAL TRANSLATION:

Of Your Holy Name, O Lord,
empower us to possess both a perpetual fear and, in no way less, a love:
because You never deprive of Your guidance
those whom You ground in the solidity of Your love.

ANOTHER STRICT VERSION:

Make us to have, O Lord, constant fear and in equal degree love of Your Holy Name, for You never abandon with Your steering those whom You establish in the firmness of Your love.

A name, in biblical and liturgical terms, refers to the essence of the one named.  The Divine Name made Moses put off his shoes.  Moses learned God’s Name to tell the captive Jews that the one who is Being Itself – “I AM” – would set them free (cf Exodus 2).  Once destitute, they were instituted as His People.  So sacred was the terrible Name of God for the Jews that they would not pronounce the four Hebrew letters used to indicate it in Scripture, substituting instead “Adonai”, “Lord”.

What does Our Lord says about His own Name?  In John 16:23 Jesus – Hebrew/Aramaic Yeshua from Yehoshua, “Yahweh saves” – reveals His unity with the Father and the power of His Name saying, “Truly, truly, I say to you, if you ask anything of the Father, he will give it to you in my name.”  In Mark 9:38-39 there is an exchange between the beloved disciple and the Lord about people casting out demons in Jesus’ name. Jesus said, ‘No one who does a mighty work in my name will be able soon after to speak evil of me.’” The Name “Jesus” can change hearts.  John 20:31 says, “these [signs] are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in his name”.

His Name – His Person – is our path to everlasting life.

The Name of God, of God the Father, God the Son Jesus Christ, God the Holy Spirit, is worthy of our fear and our love.

Many today want to stress only the love of the Name of Jesus without the holy fear which is its due.  We must not exclude reverential awe and fear of that which God’s Name implies.  In Scripture forms of words for “fear” occur hundreds and hundreds of times.  Scripture is imbued with loving fear of God, indeed, a fear leading to love and wisdom.

God’s Holy Name is sacred.  How we use or react to the Holy Name indicates our interior disposition.  Do we use it with reverential love?  Do we speak it with respect?   Is His Name, uttered by another during the day or by ourselves in the recesses of the night, a source of dread because we are destitute in our sins, terrified of the Judge?   Rather than deal with His Name, do we fill our lives with noise and clamor so that we need never hear a deep “GOD”, with all that God implies?

“God fearing” men and women need not have terror of the Lord.  His Name is a consolation.

Today’s prayer reveals a way out of the terror for God.  Through reverential fear of His Name and of who He is and what He has done, we move to the love that knows no fear (cf 1 John 4:16-18).

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, SESSIUNCULA, WDTPRS | Tagged
Leave a comment

Daily Rome Shot 1647: New sermons by Augustine!

 

Welcome registrant:

Chas.84

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

A new endeavor: Mom’s Stuff Page – What is it? What’s it worth?

In a nutshell, my late-mother left a boat load of stuff in her house and I simply have to get rid of it.  I don’t know for sure, but some things could be valuable.  You readers are really good at information from study and life experience.  HELP FATHER!  HERE

White mates in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.


We are hearing chatter that Leo XIV dropped discussion of Just War Theory from the upcoming consistory. GOOD! The last thing we need is people who can’t walk an imaginary dog spitting into the bucket about something that has been worked over by geniuses for centuries. You might check out the article at NCReg by an old prof of mine John Rist, an serious scholar of patristics and also a famed writer in the field of ethics. If there is anyone anywhere who does know what the Just War Theory is about, it is he.

This is very cool. Two new sermons by St. Augustine have been found and confirmed. HERE There’s a lot of stuff hidden in the corners and nooks of old places.

There’s a lot of stuff now hidden in this blog, too, since the migration.  Links to photos and podcasts changed.  I am not sure what to do about.  So, in the face of your inquiries… “Where did it go?”… I humbly ask your patience.

Please renew your prayers that the SSPX and Pope Leo can come to some positive agreement before the consecration of bishops on 1 July.

Remember, O most gracious Virgin Mary, that never was it known that anyone who fled to thy protection, implored thy help, or sought thy intercession was left unaided. Inspired by this confidence, I fly unto thee, O Virgin of virgins, my Mother. To thee do I come, before thee I stand, sinful and sorrowful. O Mother of the Word Incarnate, despise not my petitions, but in thy mercy hear and answer me. Amen.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1646: We have to move on.

A new endeavor: Mom’s Stuff Page – What is it? What’s it worth?

In a nutshell, my late-mother left a boat load of stuff in her house and I simply have to get rid of it.  I don’t know for sure, but some things could be valuable.  You readers are really good at information from study and life experience.  HELP FATHER!  HERE

White can mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

With a biretta tip to the late Tom Petty.

We have to move on. Time to get going.
What lies ahead I have no way of knowing.
Walking together, unity’s growing
We have to move on, its time to get going.

Broken dialogue with the porn-writing Prefect
the Conciliar points objectors
are tradition protectors
against doctrine defectors

Broken skyline, which way to love land
Which way to something better
Which way to forgiveness
Which way do I go

We have to move on. Time to get going.
What lies ahead I have no way of knowing.
Walking together, unity’s growing
We have to move on, its time to get going.

Sometime later, getting the words wrong
Wasting the meaning and losing the rhyme
Nauseous adrenaline
Like breakin’ up a dogfight
Like a deer in the headlights
Frozen in real time
I’m losing my mind

We have to move on. Time to get going.
What lies ahead I have no way of knowing.
Walking together, unity’s growing
We have to move on, its time to get going.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

In Hong Kong the the FIDE Team Rapid is going on. Only two of the world’s top 15 rapid players are not involved (Hikaru and Nepo). These are all star teams. My guy Wesley So is with WR Chess which features a couple other good players, such as Magnus and Fabi. So won drew in Rd 1, drew in Rd 3, won in Rd 4. Team Kazchess is ahead at 4-0. WR is in 5th with 301 tied with many others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
11 Comments

Detroit’s Archbishop attends mosque opening, says: “There is no place where I feel more respect, fraternity, and kindness”

From a priest…

I’m sure that you have seen this already, but the archbishop of Detroit was recently at the opening of a mosque in Dearborn, MI.

“There is no place where I feel more respect, fraternity, and kindness,” Archbishop Weisenburger said at the mosque’s opening ceremony on June 12, according to The Arab American News. “From the moment I entered this beautiful site, I felt a profound divine presence.”

What are the names of the parishes where he snuffed out the people who want to attend the TLM?

Maybe we could ask Ralph Martin, Eduardo Echeverria, and Edward Peters, all formerly of Sacred Heart Major Seminary.

Posted in What are they REALLY saying?, You must be joking! | Tagged
17 Comments

Distressing words of Leo about the SSPX consecrations

Distressing.

There are a lot of holes in this slice of Swiss cheese.

“I am considering…”.

Okay, you are running out of shopping days.

“Let’s try to live the communion of the Church.”

What does it mean “to live the communion”? And just what does that look like?  Meeting with a lay woman dressed like a bishop?  How does one “live the communion”?  I sense here a rather nebulous notion of a word we hear a lot these days which doesn’t seem to have a clear definition: unity.  What is “unity” in 2026?

“what it means for them and for the Church.”

On the one hand, the antics that take place in German churches and in S. America are given a pass, but the faithful celebration of the Church’s liturgical rites is marginalized.  What does that mean for the Church?  Lex orandi.

“division among Christians is a painful point.”

Then don’t punch the bruised part.

“they refuse to accept some fundamental elements of the Church, starting with several points from the Second Vatican Council.”

Let me get this straight… the SSPX refuses “to accept some fundamental elements of the Church” and the starting point is “several points” Vatican II?   When did “points” from Vatican II become the “fundamental elements of the Church”?  And, please, which points are those again?

If I am not mistaken, the SSPX accepts everything in the Council documents which has been dogmatically defined.  However, there are “several points” in the documents – which aren’t intended to define anything – which seem to contradict things which have been promulgated by Popes in the past.  That makes those points matters for deeper discussion.   Otherwise, you are merely forcing people to say that they accept something they don’t understand or which they disagree with.

“How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?’
‘Four.’
‘And if the party says that it is not four but five—then how many?’
‘Four.”

Is this what we are about now?   What happened to John XXIII’s “In necessary things unity, in doubtful things liberty, in all things charity?”

This is a formula for moral injury.

“I’m sorry but we have to move on.”

Move on to… what?    What does “moving on” involve and towards what?

3 So he told them this parable: 4 “What man of you, having a hundred sheep, if he has lost one of them, does not leave the ninety-nine in the wilderness, and go after the one which is lost, until he finds it says “Well… I still have 99, so that’s just too bad – gotta keep moving”? 5 And when he has found it, he lays it on his shoulders, rejoicing moved on with his 99 sheep, he says, “¡Qué lástima, pero adiós!”. 6 And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and his neighbors, saying to them, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep which was lost.  I’ve walked together with an increasingly smaller flock, but that’s how things are because there are fundamental points which emerged in the 1960’s so important in 2026 that it’s time to move on’.

Nope.  Sorry it’s time to move on.  That sheep, well… too bad.  Because,… points.

This is so confusing.

Meanwhile, I could point out that no matter what the high and mighty in the Church have since the Council done to the Church and her identity for the sake of “unity” with the Orthodox or Anglicans or Lutherans has resulted in true unity. They are still doing whatever they do, even though we’ve done backflips while juggling umbrellas to signal that we aren’t rigid and scary and, gosh, we don’t want to offend them. Fact: they’re not going to join up if we try to be like them.

I urge people to watch the second part of the SSPX video series about their missionary work.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Leo XIV, Pray For A Miracle, SSPX, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged
48 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1646: Restoration and BOGO SALE

BOGO information below!

The work of restoration continues at The Parish™.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

Welcome registrant:

dcastlen50@hotmail.com

The Benedictine nuns of Gower Abbey in Missouri are having a BOGO sale

BOGO OVERSTOCK SALE! Order our new album and get 50% off a purchase of either of our two albums: “Christ The King at Ephesus” and/or “The Hearts of Jesus, Mary and Joseph at Ephesus”

A new album featuring polyphony and chants in honor of the Apostles, including an ancient Compostela pilgrimage song in honor of St. James, chants from the feasts of St. Peter, and hymns in honor of modern apostles such as St. John Henry Newman’s “Praise To The Holiest”.

Recorded by the Benedictines of Mary in March of 2026.

They’ve posted some samples.   Go check it out.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

White to move and mate in 4.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments

ASK FATHER: Priest says the consecration of the chalice over the host

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I cannot believe what happened at the Jubilee Mass to commemorate the consecration of our cathedral this morning

[Link to video]

Watch from just before the 37 minute mark, where the Consecration starts.

I didn’t present myself for Holy Communion because I wasn’t sure if he’d be giving me the Body of Christ that had been consecrated at a previous Mass, or an unconsecrated wafer.

Okay… there’s no explicit question here. However, there could be an implicit question: Would what the priest did at the consecration of the Host validly consecrate the Host or did it not.

For those of you who cannot see the video, the priest, who seems to be trying to be careful and stick to the book, picked up the host and promptly said the form for the consecration of the chalice, not the host. NB: The “Benedictine” Arrangement of the altar.

Before, you get worked up, things happen. Priests get distracted. In the way he was saying Mass, there’s little indication that this was malicious or mischievous. He simply blew it.  Poor guy.  I bet he is mortified.

That leads us to the substance of the matter, so to speak.

QUAERITUR:

If a priest says the words of consecration for the chalice over the host, instead of the consecration for host, is the consecration of that host valid?

No. According to the older sacramental manuals, the host would not be validly consecrated if the priest used the chalice form over bread, for example, saying over the host:

Hic est enim calix Sanguinis mei…

instead of:

Hoc est enim Corpus meum.

The reason is that the sacramental form must signify what it effects. For the consecration of bread, the form must signify the conversion of bread into the Body of Christ. St. Thomas gives the principle clearly: “the form for the consecration of the bread ought to signify the actual conversion of the bread into the body of Christ.” The chalice form signifies the conversion of wine into the Blood of Christ, not the conversion of bread into the Body of Christ.

Matter and form must correspond. Bread is apt matter for the consecration of the Body; wine is apt matter for the consecration of the Blood. The form for the chalice does not determine bread to become the Body of Christ. (STh III, q. 78, a. 1) The priest’s intention to consecrate the host cannot supply for a substantially defective form.

The papal Bull De defectibus of Pius V gives the governing principle:

“If the priest were to shorten or change the form of the consecration of the body and blood, so that in the change of wording the words did not mean the same thing, he would not be achieving a valid sacrament. If, on the other hand, he were to add or take away anything which did not change the meaning, the sacrament would be valid, but he would be committing a grave sin” (No. 20).

In this case in the video, “This is the chalice of My Blood” does not signify “This is My Body.”

So the practical conclusion is: the host remains unconsecrated bread. The priest ought to have corrected the defect by pronouncing the proper form of consecration over the host. If he has already gone on the older, rubrical solution is that he must return to the point of the defective consecration and supply the proper form.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
10 Comments

From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 26-06-15 – Ordination?

June 15th, 2026

Dear Diary,

Yesterday I accidentally ordained nobody. Or maybe two. Or maybe one. It’s apparently still being discussed by the canonical trolls at the end of the hall who given a question, immediately start whispering and photocopying.

It was supposed to be an ordination to the priesthood. I’ve done it before, of course.  Beautiful. Pictures. People happy. Nice lunch after. Two men.  It all went wrong.

The first warning sign was that the permanent deacon assigned to the cathedral was acting as MC.  The problem was that Fr. Lars the new liturgy director now that Msgr. Tommy’s on the job elsewhere broke his leg playing pickleball.  I told McSwiney at the cathedral last week, “Do not use Deacon Carl.” They used Deacon Carl.  Carl is a nice man but that don’t cut it. Fr. Gilbert said, “He has been preparing for days.” That was supposed to reassure me. Chester prepares for days before he throws up behind my chair.

Everything went well until it didn’t. I was thinking that the choir was not awful, which is already a miracle under McSwiney’s rule.  The candidates came forward. Blah blah blah.  Time for the litaney and prostration. Then deacon Bill, an ordinand – late vocation in his 60’s – starting wobbling. Thin shoulders, hot vestments, his eyes rolled up like window shades and he gently, almost gracefully flowed down to the floor at the time to prostate.  At first, we thought it was rehearsed. But then he didn’t get up.

Carl panicked. Instead of letting things breathe for half a second, Carl flapped his binder at me and hissed, “Continue, Bishop! Forward!” as if we were playing football.  Msgr. Tommy, who was seated off to the side with that look he gets when civilization is ending again, lazered me with his eyes. I looked at Carl. Carl pointed at the book.  So I continued.

That was my mistake.

Poor Bill had been hauled up ono a chair, fanned by three seminarians, one of whom looked like he was about to join him on the marble. The other ordinand remained kneeling there hands folded with an expression like, “I chose priesthood … here?”   Water was brought.  Towels.

Carl was stabbing the binder and the page. Wrong page, I think. Maybe the right page. Who knows. He stabbed and I began the prayer of ordination in my bishop voice ’cause I’ve done this before and I was in charge and I’m the bishop.  Then, from somewhere behind me, in a whisper that somehow filled the entire church, one of the priests – the VG? – said, “You have to lay on hands!”

There are things you never want to hear when you are already inside the ordination prayer.  That’s one of them.  I stopped mid sentence.  You could hear the air conditioning. Actually, you could hear it because it squeals and McSwiney still hasn’t fixed it even though I told him to in March.

I look over at Tommy who had gone very still. That’s worse than when he is angry. Gilbert was making tiny little pointing motions at his own hands and head. Deacon Carl was looking at the book as if it had betrayed him.

I said, quietly, “Now?”  Carl said, “Now.”

So I stepped forward, laid hands on the kneeling man, then walked over to the one on the chair because apparently he was still an ordinand I guess even though at that point he was sort of out of it. I laid hands on him too. I returned to my chair and continued the prayer from the place I had stopped.

There was a growling noise from Tommy.  Never good.

I just wanted to get on with it and leave, get the Mass going and get out of there. That’s when Tommy blocked everything.   He marched up to me and said, “We can’t go forward.  You didn’t ordain them validly.”

“They’re priests now,” I objected. He said, “Are they?”

I hate questions like that.  I knew he was right.   Like a machine gun he explained that I didn’t lay on hands and then I stopped the ordination prayer not just anywhere but in the in the middle of the defined form of the sacrament – even I know that’s bad – and then picked it up later.   Carl stood there blinking like a cow. The diocesan communications girl was crying because the livestream was still running.

One of the canonists joined in, then another, and then one of the seniors.  They always do when there is blood in the water. One said “moral unity.” Another said “substantial interruption.” A third said “conditional ordination”.  Tommy said, “No. Proper ordination. Now. Before we go on.”   I said, “What will people think?!”  Tommy blinked and stared at me for a moment and said, “You can’t let these men act like priests.  Invalid Masses, problems with stipends, the noonch.”  He know how to get my attention.  I said, “Alright, Monsignor Tommy, you tell them.”  I gestured to the congregation.

He did.  He charged like Chester going at a donut straight at the ambo and with that calm voice of his announced something like, for the sake of certainty and for the good of the Church these men will serve, the correct rite of ordination will be carried out immediately.  We ask you to pray with with all your hearts for these men and thank God for the gift of the priesthood. Later half the people said they thought it was beautiful. The other half thought it was part of the rite.

Msgr Tommy sort of elegantly elbowed deacon Carl out of the picture and took over.  He had everything arranged and rest of the things needed down the line doubled checked in about two minutes. Two. I have committees that take two months to decide what color the bathroom signs should be.  He gave the nod.  By this time, poor dcn Bill was doing much better.

This time I laid hands first. Everybody in the sanctuary watched my hands like I was defusing a bomb. Then I prayed the whole prayer uninterrupted. Tommy nodded at me once with a smile and we continued with smooth precision, no Carl or binder in sight. Afterward the new priests thanked TOMMY.  The one who feinted apologized to me with tears in his eyes.

After a little while with blessings and shaking hands and chatting with people we went to Razzo’s, me, Tommy, Gilbert. Not Carl. I ordered the veal with extra mushrooms. Tommy had ossobuco. Gilbert had seafood pasta got sauce on his cuff.

Tommy was quiet at first. Then he said, “You know what happened.”

I said, “Yes, Monsignor. Deacon Carl happened.”

He said, “No. Sloppiness happened.”  I hate it when he is right.

Gilbert tried to help by saying, “At least it was fixed, and then stared into his pasta and didn’t help again.  I told Tommy I’d remove Carl from cathedral ceremonies. “From all ceremonies!” he said. Me, “He is the cathedral’s permanent deacon.” Tommy said, “Then permanently sit him somewhere else.” That made me laugh. I didn’t want to but I did.

Razzo himself came over with limoncello and said he heard we had a big day at the cathedral. I said, “You have no idea.” He said, “Bishop, in this diocese, assume I do.”

When I got home Chester had dragged one of my red slippers into the hall and was sleeping on it. He opened one eye as if to say he doubts about the validity of me.

I am tired. I am irritated. I am also relieved. Tomorrow I have to call the noonch’s office before someone sends them a clip. I will say we acted promptly out of an abundance of caution. That phrase covers a multitude of sins.  Gotta praise Tommy for intervening, which proves that we are after all really on top of things here.

Gotta fix things at the cathedral.  I mean, so long as they didn’t really impact me, it was okay, but this whole thing made me look really bad and was nearly a disaster.

Should I tear these pages out?

Posted in Diary of Bp. McButterpants | Tagged ,
8 Comments