ROME 26/10-11 – Day 37: For awhile…

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 37: For awhile...

I was up before the Roman sun rose at 06:46.

By the time it set at 17:01 I was winging my my to these USA.

The Ave Maria Bell probably didn’t ring anywhere for the Roman Curia at 17:30.

The hired car came promptly and off I went after last minute run to pitch some trash in a nearby bin.

From the car I saw that the statue of Gioachino Belli has been tidied up.  The last time, there were indications of repairs.

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 37: For awhile...

If you fly out of FCO and go upstairs to the second level where there are a few (mostly bad) food options, by all means possible AVOID Costa Coffee.  I ordered a cappuccino and a cornetto and got… neither.  Frankly, it was the most disgusting coffee ever put into my hand.  One sip and I upended it into their garbage.  The cornetto was on par.   This place should be gutted and a pit left where in large letters is written: CAVEAT EMPTOR.

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 37: For awhile...

My view for a long while.

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 37: For awhile...

I really don’t want to do this again.  Not like this.  In past I have been breaking up the trip with a layover of a couple nights and flying out of JFK instead of connecting all the way through.  This time I went through and came back through ATL, which made the crossing a couple hours longer.   Then the next leg.  Then the drive home.  It was not fun.

Moreover, my A/C is dead.   This is not a good thing where I live.

That probably kills my ability to get back to Rome for Christmas.   We shall see.

Time to ask St. Joseph for help again.

Meanwhile…

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

“Sometimes the scalpel is the honey.” Wherein Fr. Z rants about “the parable of the wheat and tares”.

As we swoop in toward the end of the liturgical year we come to the 5th Sunday (Remaining) after Epiphany.  We fill in the gap between the 23rd Sunday after Pentecost and the Last Sunday with Mass formularies uncelebrated after Epiphany.

The Gospel is from Matthew 13:24-43, the parable of the wheat and the tares, or cockle, a nasty and destructive weed that looks like wheat while growing, but eventually chokes out the wheat because its roots spread out and wrap up the roots of other plants.  Sowing tares, cockle in a wheat field is biological warfare.  So bad was this known to be in an agrarian society that there were Imperial laws against doing this to the enemy.

There is a warning in the Gospel for those of us who see things going wrong in the Church and want to do something.

You know the main line of the parable.  The servants discover cockle, tares among the wheat. Their master had sown good seed, but an enemy sowed the enemy weed while they, unwary, slept. They correctly identify the problem and offer pull it up.

The master stops them.

Lest perhaps gathering up the cockle, you root up the wheat also together with it. (v. 29)

The master doesn’t gaslight, doesn’t tell them they just imagined the cockle. He doesn’t propose a listening session about the enriching diversity of agricultural expressions. He correctly surmises “An enemy has done this” (v. 29). The evil is real. Nevertheless, their remedy could damage the crop they want to protect.

That ought to give us pause, especially online.

Liturgical abuses, doctrinal confusion, and clerical stupidity, even downright persecution for simply wanting to live a traditional Catholic life can warrant indignation and rightly ordered anger. Those responsible for correcting them or perpetrating them will answer to God.  Moreover, there are times when we must stand up for ourselves.  In those cases, it is good to remember the principle aims of forensics, of rhetoric, that is, docere (to teach), delectare (to delight) and movere (to move).   For example, a good preacher will seen to help people to understand some point of the Faith, to welcome it, and then to act upon it.

You can be right all day long and on weekends about the appalling things are certainly are going on.  But in our reacting in our interacting with others we remember, with the three principle aims also the imperative of charity, that is, sacrificial love that seeks the true good of others.  Not a false, chimeric, ephemeral good.  The true good, which inevitably involves salvation of souls and the love of God.

Hence, tailoring the message is of critical importance because the point is to move, to stir the affections and the will of others toward a judgment or an action.

Sometimes concise explanation is enough to do this.  Sometimes it requires carefully constructed arguments.  Sometime a gentle style is needed and sometimes what must be applied is scorn for the sake of opening eyes and ears.   Certainly St. Francis de Sale was right in saying:

“Soyez toujours le plus doux que vous pourrez, et souvenez-vous que l’on prends plus de mouches avec une cuillère de miel qu’avec cent barils de vinaigre… Always be as gentle as you can and remember that one catches more flies with a spoonful of honey than with a hundred barrels of vinegar.”

On the other hand, as St. Augustine says about God’s corrections, “Clamas: sed adhuc secat… You scream, but He keeps sutting.” The image is from ancient medicine before anesthesia.  The doctor doesn’t stop cutting just because the patient is screaming for him to stop.  (Tr. on John 7.12 and Exp. Ps. 33, s 2, 20.)

Sometimes the scalpel is the honey.

Why did I says that the parable of the wheat and tares is cautionary?  Why underscore the masters correct solution was not immediately to tear us the tares and risk also the wheat?

Being right about a problem doesn’t justify every word we issue in reaction.  Being right doesn’t automatically mean that however we respond is the right response, as if some response is better than no response.  Tearing up the tares, with their roots entangled in the wheat would lose the whole point of the wheat field: the harvest by which they would not starve to death.

By the way, St. Augustine used this parable during the Donatist controversy, explaining that the Church was like the wheat field permixtum malis et bonis… mixed through with people both good and bad.  It belongs to the Lord of the Harvest to sort them.

But it also belongs, for the sake of good order here for us to tend our fields, entrusted to us.

I am going to answer to the Master for what I did to His wheat.  Please, God, let my scale tip in favor of the wheat.

We can become so pleased with our denunciations that we scarcely notice the souls within range.   Of course, sometimes we vent our frustrations without being pleased at all.  Sure, there is a time and place for venting.  Venting can be a good thing.  And yet, too much of a good thing is too much.

Someone is out there who is confused and may need instruction. For sure there is out there a beginner finding his way toward Tradition who may need TLC or who might carry considerable baggage.  We – I – can make his next step easier or harder.

The wheat has roots we cannot see.

Hence Saint Paul’s instructions in the Epistle for this Sunday from Colossians 3 about mercy, humility, meekness, patience, and forgiveness. Charity requires us to seek our neighbor’s conversion and salvation, which means considering what will actually help him.

Sometimes a sharp word will help. Sometimes it merely satisfies our appetite for delivering one.  Great care is required.

This is why, in the “Internet Prayer” which I wrote so many years ago, I included the petition that we might:

“treat with charity and patience all those souls whom we encounter.”

Souls. Even behind an anonymous username, beyond even to the anonymous “lurker” who observes but does not comment, there is someone who will face judgment and whom God desires to save.   Hence, “Think before posting.”

The tare of pride flourishes quite happily beside the grain of sound theology and reverent liturgy.  While inspecting everyone else’s tares, we can neglect what is taking root in ourselves.

For my part, I resolve to – more than I have lately – to return to the spirit of that “Internet Prayer” which I admit to have neglected.   I need to make sure that my scalpel is honey and not just pain.

I’d ask for readers and commentators here to pray before going online. Then let the prayer govern where your eyes take you what your fingers tap out.

 

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, SESSIUNCULA, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged
Leave a comment

Some notes for your Sunday Mass in the Vetus and the Novus Ordo

For those of you who frequent the Novus Ordo, tomorrow is the 32nd Ordinary Sunday (Year A).  I have something for you over at my newish Substack (which you should visit, subscribe so you’ll get alerts)  HERE

Excerpt:

For a while people criticized education by memorization and repetition. They claimed that children just mouth things they don’t understand. On the other hand, though they might not understand them at the moment, one day in the future they do. When they need it, they remember something important because, long ago, someone made them learn it. Soldiers and sailors gripe during basic training and entertain homicidal thoughts about their drill instructors. Not a few return to their instructors later and thank them. When the time came for that skill or tool or piece of knowledge to be used in a critical moment, they had it. Similarly, in the struggle of spiritual warfare in this vale of tears, the Church’s repetition of readings and orations and devotional prayers and Acts of Contrition, Faith, Hope, Love, and many others is to make important things available when we no longer have the luxury of stopping to think everything through from the beginning. In a moment of temptation, in the confusion of a crisis, at the bedside of a dying loved one, or when our own death approaches, we have ready to hand the truths of the Faith and the prayers of the Church. The time to learn them is before we desperately need them.

For those of you who frequent the Vetus Ordo, tomorrow is the 5th Sunday Remaining after Epiphany.  I have something for you at One Peter Five, for which I write a weekly piece.  HERE

Excerpt:

The enemy sowed the weeds “cum dormirent homines… while the men were sleeping”.

This is a warning about negligence and presumption. Errors enter when vigilance slackens. Abuses become habitual when those charged with maintaining discipline neglect their duties. The Enemy is patient, industrious, and highly capable of taking advantage of even small opportunities supplied by sleepy shepherds.

The master’s command to leave the weeds until the harvest aims at the final separation of the wicked from the just. It does not abolish the Church’s obligation to correct error, admonish sinners, protect the innocent, or exercise legitimate discipline. Charity and vigilance must work together, particularly when those in authority have the duty to safeguard souls.  Now should we presume that we can always identify with certainty who belongs among the wheat and who among the tares. A sinner can repent. Someone who appears outwardly respectable may be inwardly corrupt. God sees what human judgment cannot.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 36: Ultimate

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 36: UltimateMy last full day in Rome has come to its conclusion.  Tomorrow early it’s off to FCO.

Today was the Feast of the Holy Relics preserved in Rome.  I had the honor of saying Mass at what was once the tomb of St. Giovanni Battista de Rossi which, because of its contact with the body of the saint (now transferred to another church) is a special 2nd class relic, at least.  A great saint.

The sun rose at 06:45

The sun set at 17:02

The Ave Maria is still in 17:30 cycle.

Tomorrow is a 1st Friday.

NB: I have a priest onboard who could really benefit from a Gregorian Mass series (with a generous stipend…. my words, not his).   He says only the Novus Ordo.  Drop me a line.   HERE  Put in the subject line “REQUEST GREGORIAN MASS” 

I did a lot of chores today, cleaning, throwing, sorting.  Packing is getting easier, since I have enough things in my place that I don’t have to lug impedimenta back and forth.  I’m taking home a particular kind of soap that the Josephite Sisters who prepare starched corporal use in their preparation.  We shall see.  I have my own recipe, but they are the pros and I a mere dabbler.

I went to a favorite place for supper with a friend.  We split a couple of things.

This is/was thin sliced tongue and pizza bianca with homemade mayo and herbal pesto.

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 36: Ultimate

Next, again a split course, risotto milanese and ossobuco.  This is just half a portion.  It is the sort of thing that you get on a winter day when you have to chop wood.   So, good.  A half portion was about right.

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 36: Ultimate

White to move and mate in 4.

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 36: Ultimate

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Meanwhile…

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
12 Comments

WDTPRS – 5 November: Feast of the Holy Relics. These bones shall live again. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

WDTPRS - 5 November: Feast of the Holy Relics. These bones shall live again. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

The arm of St. Francis Xavier

Today, 5 November, in our traditional liturgical calendars, we find a feast which might surprise many Catholics: the Feast of the Holy Relics.

No, this is not a special day set aside to celebrate your aging pastor, although some of them may seem to qualify.

A relic, from Latin reliquiae, “remains”, is a tangible connection with a saint or blessed. First class relics are bodily remains, such as bones, hair, blood, or ashes. Second class relics are objects personally used or worn by the saint, such as clothing, books, or instruments of martyrdom. Third class relics are objects, usually pieces of cloth or holy cards, rosaries, touched to a first class relic or a saint’s tomb. Relics of Our Lord’s Passion, such as fragments of the True Cross, occupy a special place of honor.

Authentic relics deserve reverent treatment, never commercial exploitation.  Alas, one does see that.

As far as concerns this feast, look in the back of an older Missal, among the Masses pro aliquibus locis, “for certain places”. There you may find the formulary Multae tribulationes, a Mass with red vestments in honor of the sacred relics preserved in churches, dioceses and religious communities. The feast was celebrated on various dates according to local calendars, frequently on 5 November. It never belonged to the universal Roman calendar as an obligatory observance.

Some context.

During November, Holy Mother Church directs our attention to prayer for the dead and the Four Last Things.   We have just celebrated All Saints and All Souls. On the former we looked toward Heaven and the glory of those who have attained their eternal reward. On the later we prayed for those who have died in God’s friendship but who still require purification. Now, with the Feast of Holy Relics, we turn our attention to the earthly remains of the saints, whose souls enjoy the Beatific Vision while their bodies await the general resurrection.

While I outlined, above, that there are different “levels” of relics, and that even among the first class relics there are different kinds, I’ll focus for a moment on… bones.

The Introit of this special Mass begins with Psalm 33 (34):

Multae tribulationes justorum, et de his omnibus liberabit eos Dominus: Dominus custodit omnia ossa eorum: unum ex his non conteretur.

Many are the afflictions of the just, and out of them all the Lord will deliver them. The Lord guards all their bones; not one of them shall be broken.

“Wait a minute”, you might be thinking, “The saints certainly suffered. Some were tortured, mutilated, burned, beheaded, exposed to wild beasts. Their bones were broken, their bodies destroyed, their ashes scattered. Yet the Psalm proclaims that God guards their bones.  How can this be?”

The answer is found, I think, in the resurrection of the dead. No violence done to a martyr’s body, no decomposition in the grave, no scattering of ashes can frustrate Almighty God. What men destroy, God can restore. The body which was the instrument of a saint’s fidelity, which fasted, prayed, labored, suffered and received Holy Communion, remains destined for glory.   In the general Resurrection, our souls (the form) will once again inform a body (the matter).  What was seemingly destroyed shall rise again.   I have in mind the incredible fresco in the Cathedral of Orvieto in which Signorelli depicts the  rising righteous drawing their new bodies out of a perfectly flat white plain (prime matter, waiting to be informed).  They start as bones, skeletons and are enfleshed anew as perfect 33-year olds (the years of Jesus on Earth).

WDTPRS - 5 November: Feast of the Holy Relics. These bones shall live again. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

With that in mind, here is the…

COLLECT

Auge in nobis, Domine, resurrectionis fidem,
qui in Sanctorum tuorum reliquiis mirabilia operaris:
et fac nos immortalis gloriae participes,
cuius in eorum cineribus pignora veneramur. 

LITERAL VERSION:

O Lord, increase in us faith in the resurrection,
You who work wonders through the relics of Your Saints,
and enable us to be sharers in immortal glory,
the pledges of which we venerate in their ashes.

The imperative auge is from augeo, “to increase, enlarge, augment”. Wit polite boldness we ask God to increase our faith specifically in the Resurrection. We readily profess in the Creed, “I await the Resurrection of the dead.”

That’s an article of the Creed.  It might be a good idea to reflect on what it means.

The Collect gives the reason for our confidence: God is working wonders in the relics of His saints. The verb operaris is present tense. God is working. The souls of saints have departed this earthly life, but God’s power remains active. Their bodily remains can become instruments through which His goodness is manifested.

The petition of the Collect is that we ask to share in “immortal glory”, of which we venerate pignora in the ashes of the saints.

Pignus, plural pignora, means “a pledge, something given as a guarantee of future fulfillment”.  A holy relic of a saint is a pledge of the Resurrection. We reverence these remains because of what God has promised to accomplish. The bones of the saints (as well as other kinds of relics) point like a pledge beyond the grave toward the glory which awaits the whole person, body and soul.

Note the contrast between cineribus, “ashes”, and immortalis gloriae, “immortal glory”. The most apparently perishable, indeed already perished things are through the eyes of faith signs of what cannot perish.

Our secularized “culture” is uncomfortable with death. We disguise it, sanitize it, remove it from ordinary sight. We prefer celebrations of life to the sober Christian recognition of death, judgment and eternity.  Think about how graveside rites usually cover over the waiting dirt pile.

The Church, meanwhile, puts a bone of a dead person – sometimes the entire remains – in a golden reliquary, surrounds it with candles, incenses it, and invites us to kneel.

Which approach takes the human body more seriously?

One modern view of the body is that it is just a vehicle I ride around in, something I own, like a car.  I can do what I want to the thing I own.  It’s not really “me” after all.  Right?  The problem with that is that if your body isn’t really you and it is something you can “own” and do with as you please, then so can someone else.  After all, it’s not really “you”, right?  If someone wants to do terrible things to you, well… too bad.  It’s not really…. “you”.  No.  We humans are both soul and body.  I am my body, also.  Hence we can never mistreat the bodies of others (at least the innocent).  Bodies reflect the image of God, who works His mighty will through us.

Scripture teaches us that God works through material things. In 4 Kings 13:21 (2 Kings in modern numbering), a dead man is restored to life when his body touches the bones of the prophet Elisha. In Acts 19:11-12, cloths which had touched St. Paul were brought to the sick, who were healed. In Acts 5:15, the sick were placed where even St. Peter’s passing shadow might fall upon them.

Our religion is incarnational. God took flesh. The Eternal Word entered our material world and made use of material realities to communicate divine life. Water becomes the instrument of baptismal regeneration. Oil is used in Confirmation and Anointing. The Eucharistic Lord gives us His true Body and Blood under the appearances of bread and wine.

The veneration of relics makes perfect sense within this sacramental, incarnational framework.

The Council of Trent (25th Session), taught that the bodies of the saints, once living members of Christ and temples of the Holy Ghost, are destined to be raised and glorified. Therefore they are rightly venerated. God bestows many benefits upon men through them.

The honor given to saints and their relics is veneratio, not the latria reserved to the Most Holy Trinity. We adore God alone.  Relics possess no magical power independent from God. God is the source of every grace and authentic miracle. Nor should genuine devotion be confused with indiscriminate enthusiasm for every purported relic that turns up on the internet.  BEWARE of “trafficking” in relics, which, if they are real is sacrilege and if false is blasphemous.  “Trafficking” creates a self-perpetuating market.

Since I write this on my last full day in Rome, there is a particularly Roman dimension to this Feast of Holy Relics.

Rome is filled with relics. Beneath its altars lie martyrs who shed their blood for Christ. In its churches we encounter the mortal remains of apostles, popes, confessors and virgins whose lives shaped Christendom.  From where I sit as I write this, within a, say, 15 minute walk there are the tombs of dozens of saints, well-known, and literally thousands of reliquaries.  To focus on just one aspect of church’s here, most of them have side altars.  Your parish church may have as well.  If consecrated, they have relics in them, sometimes whole bodies.  Otherwise, there will be an altar stone for the celebration of Mass containing a relic.

The ancient custom of celebrating Mass over the tombs of martyrs, and subsequently placing relics within altars, unites the Sacrifice of Christ with the witness of those who followed Him even unto death.

Considered just from this characteristic, the altar itself is a sermon.

Which … when we see some modern altars makes you wonder what they who built it believe.

At Santissima Trinità dei Pellegrini here in Rome, The Parish™, there is a beautiful custom of solemnly exposing the relics preserved in the church around the time of All Saints. I have previously written about this and provided video of the ceremony. I have video from this year, too, but I have to wait to get back to the USA to edit it together.  The relics are brought forward and presented to the faithful, with the saints identified as the reliquaries are displayed.

It is an impressive reminder of the Communion of Saints.  In relics, our communion with the heavenly blessed is made more tangible, a pledge (pignus) that it is attainable.

How many parishes possess relics which have languished for decades in cupboards, sacristy drawers or forgotten cabinets? These venerable treasures should once again be displayed reverently, accompanied by sound catechesis. A parish – convent – diocese – entrusted with relics has a responsibility to preserve and honor them.  If the relics are not in good repair, they can be repaired but ONLY by someone who knows what he is doing and has the backing and oversight of proper authority, such as the diocesan bishop.  Do NOT fiddle around with reliquaries on your own, except, perhaps to give them a little cleaning.  Do NOT open them up.

I digress.

There are some practical considerations that flow from this feast and from veneration of relics in general.

When you venerate a relic, remember that the saint whose remains are before you was once as you are now. He fought temptations. She struggled with distractions in prayer. They experienced fatigue, discouragement, fear, physical suffering and the difficulties of living faithfully their state of life in a fallen world. Their sanctity was accomplished through cooperation with grace amid the ordinary circumstances of human life.  Some of them in a flash evidenced through grace heroic virtues in the moment of their martyrdom.

Their bodies were instruments of that cooperation.

Our bodies, too, are meant to serve God. The hands with which we work, the eyes with which we look upon the world, the knees upon which we pray, the tongue with which we receive the Blessed Sacrament, all are destined, if we persevere in grace, to share in the glory of the resurrection.   In one of those churches near to where I sit, the Gesù, there is the arm of St. Francis Xavier, the spectacular Jesuit missionary.  When you see that arm, you see beyond it also to the thousands of converts who were baptized by it.   In another direction, at San Salvatore in Lauro, is the arm of the Apostle St. Jude, patron of impossible causes…again, probably not your aging relic of a pastor.  All things are possible with God according to His will.

These remains preserved in reliquaries remind us that God’s promises are trustworthy.

You might ask your parish priests if your parish possesses relics. Ask if they can be exposed for veneration on an appropriate occasions.  Learn about the saints whose relics are preserved there. Teach your children why we honor these sacred remains.   Perhaps you might make a pilgrimage to visit the tomb of a saint or a well-known relic near where you are when you have the opportunity, and ask for his intercession.

Moreover, as the Collect for the Feast of Holy Relics prompts, pray for an increase in faith in the resurrection:

Increase in us, O Lord, faith in the Resurrection.

I wonder, in the face of all the truly alarming, sometimes horrifying things going on in the secular world but also, it must be said, in the Church, an increase precisely in belief in the Resurrection – pledged by God – might not be at least in part both a shield and a field dressing for us of the Church Militant.  Those who are faithful to Christ have a future far more glorious than the grave, making less burdensome the vicissitudes of this life.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ACTION ITEM!, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged
6 Comments

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 35: Penultimate

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 35: PenultimateTomorrow is my last full day in Rome.

Today, however,  06:44 saw the sun rise over the Seven Hills.

Sunset was 17:03.

It was the Feast of St. Charles Borromeo… an incredible saint who gave his all and died young.  What he accomplished is astonishing.  Shall we see his like again?  Ask God to raise up great saints for our day.  How this might come to pass must be left to God, given that the sort of human formation at work in the 16th c. is unthinkable now.

Recently I had supper with a Notable Catholic Commentator Well-Known To You™ at a regular haunt.  I glad to say that, while the amatriciana was good, the saltimbocca was the best I’ve had for a while.  They are really on their game right now.

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 35: Penultimate ROME 26/10-11 – Day 35: Penultimate

Check out Elle Effe… and tell them “don John” sent you.

On the way home.

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 35: Penultimate
White to move and mate in 4.

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 35: Penultimate

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Meanwhile,…

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments

Germans… “for many” in the Consecration formula, rather than “for all”

The problem is… as I see it… the approval of translation of sacramental forms is reserved to the Roman Pontiff alone. It is not an option for bishops conferences. While Benedict, probably reluctant to come down hard may have used the language of invitation, when he determined what the translation should be, that was that. If the Germans get away with this… it undermines the authority of the Roman Pontiff in the matter of the regulation of the Church’s sacraments.

 

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World | Tagged
5 Comments

WDTPRS: A charming translation for the Feast of St. Charles Borromeo – 4 November

Today, 4 November, Holy Church honors St. Charles Borromeo (+1584), the great Archbishop of Milan and champion of the Catholic Counter-Reformation.  His heart is “warded” not far from where I write, in the great church San Carlo al Corso.

WDTPRS: A charming translation for the Feast of St. Charles Borromeo - 4 November

WDTPRS: A charming translation for the Feast of St. Charles Borromeo - 4 November

The Collect for his feast asks that the pastoral solicitude which distinguished Charles in life may continue to benefit the Church through his heavenly intercession.

Ecclésiam tuam, Dómine,
sancti Cároli Confessóris tui atque Pontíficis
contínua protectióne custódi:
ut, sicut illum pastorális sollicitúdo gloriósum réddidit;
ita nos eius intercéssio in tuo semper fáciat amóre fervéntes.

When I looked at the office of Lauds for St. Charles at the wonderful Divinum Officium I found a charming English rendering:

O Lord, give unto thy Church for an unsleeping warder thine holy Confessor Bishop Charles; upon earth his carefulness did make him glorious as a shepherd, there where he is may his prayerfulness make him effectual as a bedesman, pleading with thee to make us to love thee more.

Delightful.  This is attributed to John, Marquess of Bute (+1900), whose translation of the Roman Breviary first appeared in 1879.  It strays from the literal meaning but that’s okay.

There is something evocative about an “unsleeping warder” and a “bedesman”.  The latter is an old English word for one who prays on behalf of another, from bede, meaning prayer. Our English word “bead” comes from the same root, since prayers were counted on beads. A “warder” is a “guardian, watchman, sentinel, or keeper; one charged with protecting or guarding a person, place, or institution” from Middle English “to ward” meaning “to guard, protect, or keep watch.”  Hence, in the Collect the Latin “continua protectione custodi… guard by (his) continual protection”, is converted into “unsleeping warder”.

Pastoralis sollicitudo is his “pastoral care” becomes “prayerfulness” and his intercessio is morphed into “effectual as a bedesman”.

I suppose this can be counted as a “dynamic rendering” which presents the sense of the prayer without being confined to the Latin literally.  Effective?  I think so, but I am a sucker for archaic language and imagery.

The final Latin petition deserves attention: “in tuo semper faciat amore ferventes… may (his intercession) make us always fervent in Your love.”    Ferveo is “to be boiling hot, to boil, ferment, glow”.  English “fervent” obviously comes from this.

Ferventes!  Would that we were as we beg to be, through the intercession of St. Charles Borromeo, truly “glowing” in our state of life with the love of God.

 

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols, WDTPRS | Tagged
1 Comment

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 34: Requiem for deceased benefactors

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 34: Requiem for deceased benefactorsFor this 307th day of 2026, the sun rose at 06:43 over the Eternal City.

The days here are not eternal, however, and the sun set at 17:04.

The “Ave Maria” Bell for the Curia remained in the 17:30 cycle, though, as the days grow shorter the solar time for its ringing draws closer to that cycle.  The solar time for the “Ave Maria” Bell was 17:34.  Expect a change of cycle.

There were 59 days left in the year and 3 full days of my sojourn.

Mass today was a Requiem celebrated for the intention of my deceased benefactors.  Sometimes people will let me know when one of my donors has passed away and I mark them down lest I forget.  Of course, there are surely quite a few who pass and I don’t receive word.  In any event, today’s Mass was for all of them who have left this vale of tears.

ROME 26/10-11 – Day 34: Requiem for deceased benefactors

Meanwhile,…

 

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

CQ CQ CQ – EWTN shut down its shortwave radio service on 31 October. Understandable, but I have some reservations.

There is something splendid about the thought that, somewhere in the dark of night a person with a simple radio could turn a dial and hear a voice crackling across the layers of atmosphere from Rome or Alabama and discover the Catholic Faith.

It has been a while since I have been very active with amateur radio.  The logistics of where I live presents challenges for a decent antenna.   Also, on the digital side – which is really interesting and useful but which is also sort of “cheating” – I don’t have the skills to keep all the different modes we used for ZedNet working together.  We had to depend on one elmer for that.

CQ CQ CQ - EWTN shut down its shortwave radio service on 31 October. Understandable, but I have some reservations.Old ZedNet participants… drop a line!  Maybe we can kick start our activity again.

That said, we saw some years ago the Holy See shut down some of its shortwave Vatican Radio services, but they still maintain  significant services in many languages.  Now we see that EWTN has ended its own shortwave service, WEWN, after 34 years.   HERE   31 October.  Gone.

The decision is understandable from a financial standpoint. EWTN cites declining listenership, aging transmitters, large maintenance costs, and new digital alternatives.

Nevertheless, something important is now gone.

Shortwave radio can do what the internet can’t.  It can cross national borders without permission from governments, telecoms, internet service providers, or other digital gatekeepers. A relatively inexpensive receiver and a bit of wire can bring a distant voice into an isolated village or a country whose government would prefer that certain things are never heard.  Shortwave transmission can be jammed, of course, and reception is subject to atmospheric conditions. Still, its independence from a local digital infrastructure gives it a strategic value that cannot be measured simply by counting the number of listeners.

That matters particularly for the Church. The Gospel is intended for everyone, including people who don’t have other methods of modern communication or whom political authorities seek to isolate.  WEWN’s English broadcasts served Africa and the Middle East and its Spanish language service reached Latin America (where Protestants are making gains as the Church bleeds members).

A Catholic shortwave station capable of reaching distant continents was precisely the sort of audacious undertaking one associates with Mother Angelica’s boldness, willingness to tackle improbable projects, and confidence in divine Providence.   Of course the flip side involves the virtue of Prudence.   They had to measure the return on their investment in deteriorating equipment for an increasingly small audience.

Still, I have reservations about shutting down such a service.  Sure, newer technology has in effect replaced the advantages of older technology.  Now we have live video streaming, podcasts, mobile apps which reach enormous audiences.  The problem is they all depend on a massive infrastructure which can be interrupted, interfered with, even hijacked.  Shortwave offers a measure of redundancy and independence.

Perhaps it would be possible to preserve some emergency or missionary broadcasting capacity.

I don’t know the state of the question for Protestant shortwave concerns, or those of other false religions.

There is a lesson here beyond EWTN. The Church ought to be wary of becoming entirely dependent upon communication systems controlled by institutions that may not be friendly to the Faith.   New means of evangelization are welcome and they should be exploited. Nevertheless, sometimes an old technology has virtues that become apparent precisely when the new technology fails.

Some results outweigh the cost per listener bottom line.

73

PS: I received a note from AllStar that the recent PHP problems has effected it.  Nodes can be exposed.  This is something that needs attention if you are active on AllStar.

PPS: I was able to connect to our ZedNet Echolink and AllStar Node with my phone!  I’ll keep it on for awhile.

Echolink: WB0YLE-R
AllStar: 28868

Posted in New Evangelization, Semper Paratus, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
6 Comments