21 Oct – St Gaspar del Bufalo – “Hammer of Freemasons”

Today is the Feast of St. Gaspar del Bufalo (+1837), “Hammer of Freemasons”.

I have interest in St. Gaspar as one of my Roman patrons because I exercised ministry as a seminarian and then deacon at the basilica in Rome where he helped to found devotion to and the Confraternity of the Most Precious Blood at San Nicola in Carcere.   He had a tense relationship with the state (Napolean’s police were after him) and Masons tried mulitple times to assassinate him.

His answer to the French commissar asking him to sign his submission to emperor should be the motto of every pope and bishop requested to yield to the world:

“I can’t, I musn’t, I don’t want to.”

That’s how a Roman priest says ‘No’ when he wants to be talkative.”

It’s better in Italian.

‘Non posso, non debbo, non voglio!’

I wonder if Pius VII’s “Non debemus, non possumus, non volumus” didn’t come from St. Gaspar.

These days it’s more like, “Volumus! Possumus! Debetote etiam vos!”

His tomb is in the little S. Maria in Trivio, tucked away behind where the more flashy Trevi Fountain is collocated.  His bronzen tomb is not set off by glass and the hand of the image of the saint is extended outward so that you can graps it.  It is quite moving.

21 Oct - St Gaspar del Bufalo - "Hammer of Freemasons"

It seems that St. Gaspar had ways that really could irritate, as many saints.  For example, he could sense satanic objects and would charge into peoples homes to sieze and destroy them no matter how well hidden.

When he was young, he grew up across the mighty Church of the Gesù where his father was a cook for the Jesuit college there.  When Gaspar was very young he had a malady of the eyes that threatened blindness.  He was cured through the intercession of St. Francis Xavier, whose tomb is in the Gesù.  As a priest of Rome he was critical of the Papal States which got him into hot water.

St. Gaspar, Hammer of Freemasons, pray for us.

My 1st class relic of St. Gaspar.

21 Oct - St Gaspar del Bufalo - "Hammer of Freemasons"21 Oct - St Gaspar del Bufalo - "Hammer of Freemasons"

 

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols |
Leave a comment

From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 26-10-12 – Brainstorming!

From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 26-10-12 – Brainstorming!12th Oct 2026

Dear Diary,

Msgr. Tommy told me something the other day about priest morale being pretty low.  I think he’s on to something. Priests don’t laugh like they used to, even when they’re together for something fun like a convocation or a vicariate meeting. Lots of tension. I try being myself with them, but it doesn’t seem to work. I sense the younger guys are rolling their eyes behind my back but, heck, we did that too do back in the day.  But they were those crusty old rigid guys who were in charge. I don’t get it. I’m not like them. Why don’t the new guys like me?

Anyway, had a free evening tonight so I decided I’d think it over and come up with some ideas. Brianstorm!  Nothing really good on the TV.  I made myself a nice stiff manhattan – not as good as Dozer’s, but it did the trick as always.  What can I do to improve priest morale? I came up with some pretty great solutions, if I say so myself.   I’ll have to work out the details before I spring them and how, but here are a few ideas.

1 – I’m going to move EVERYONE! I think some of the issues is that guys have gotten complacent. I’ve let some of them sit in the same place too long. That has to get boring.  I’ve got some ideas about who goes where, starting with retiring McSwiney and putting Tommy at SnT.

2 – Masses are too long. Especially Sunday. Some of these guys are doing like three on Sunday and that adds up to almost maybe three hours?  Work on changes.  How do we get things down to 45 minutes tops?  That’ll make people happy, I’m sure!  Priests esp. Don’t ask Tommy!

3 – I hear there’s a lot of division between the old guys and the young guys, and some of it I don’t understand. Some of the young guys want to say the ad oriental Mass for some reason.  I think it’s because they’re shy and don’t like looking people in the eye.  They grew up on those phones and games. Anyway, I was talking to Bishop Fred, the Episcopalian over at Grace Cathedral and mentioned that. He laughed and said that that was a problem for them some years ago and he had some ideas.  NOTE: Get in touch again.

4 – Guys complain that they have too much administration, and I have to admit, I don’t know if I could do it now. It’s not like when I was a young priest. All these computer programs, and reports, and filing this thing with this department, and that with that one. So, what if I have the diocese take over all the financial stuff in the parishes? Parishes send their collections to us every weekend?  That seems pretty synodwal.

5 – Really important for morale is more syndonality synod stuff too.  I know how to look like I’m completely listening and that’ll make the guys feel like their voices are being heard, even if we’ve already come to the right conclusion.

What’s next.   I could do this with a series of decrees, maybe get Dozer’s people to help me to keep it out of the chancery staff.  They’d wanna get involved and they’d leak for sure.  Otherwise, we could have a big convocation, all the priests. I’d tell them my new ideas and then we’ll have some guy – or hey, maybe a gal! – show how modern I am – speak on syndonality synod.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Not a huge fan, but the question is dead on right…

And…

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
7 Comments

ROME 26/10– Day 19-20:

ROME 26/10– Day 19-20:When did the sun rise, you ask, over Rome? 7:26

And.. the other thing? 18:39

The Ave Maria cycle for the Roman Curia moves to 18:30. Remember, we follow solar time, but the Curia moves in 15 minute increments.

THIS… is going to be GREAT.

On The Sacrifice of the Mass: An Ascetical Treatise on the Practice of Celebrating Mass with Attention, Devotion, and Reverence by Card Giovanni Bona (Author), Fr. Cliff Ermatinger (Translator)

Cardinal Giovanni Bona (+1674) was an Italian Cistercian, a great liturgical scholar, and influential spiritual writer.  Fr. Ermatinger is a good friend.  He has great books of his own.

ROME 26/10– Day 19-20:

 

And…

And…

Gosh, I’m tired…. a shot of supper?

ROME 26/10– Day 19-20:

Is that what the meat in the USA looks like?

ROME 26/10– Day 19-20:

Soooo good.

I tastes like I remember when I was young.

Meanwhile, the dachshunds at Pippo’s say hi!

ROME 26/10– Day 19-20:

Black to move.  Mate… 4.

ROME 26/10– Day 19-20:

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Are things as bad as the seem? Auctores scinduntur.

How bad are things right now?  Pretty bad.

“Walking together” is taking up to the edge of a precipice, probably over the sea where the Gadarene swine are still moiling.

Appointments to key positions defies reason.

Convents and monasteries are in shut down mode.

Things have always been bad, because the Enemy is relentless and we humans are susceptible to all manner of temptations and trickery.   It is unthinkable that the Enemy doesn’t attack the Church through her higher leaders.  After all, though angelic and numerous the Enemy still has finite resources and limited time.  They, therefore, strike high for the greatest knock on effect.

That said, I bring a few items to your attention.   They aren’t connected, but they are, if you get my drift.

First, there’s this.   This one of the strangest, way out in left field, absurd things I’ve seen in a while.

His Eminence said:

“Not everyone understood it. Integrist circles contested that day, even making it one of the reasons for a schismatic rupture; others feared syncretism or relativism, as they still do today.” “With these words, 27 October 1986 enters into the ordinary teaching of the Magisterium. It is no longer merely an event to remember: it is a criterion through which to interpret the present.”

Ummm… no.

Actions are not magisterial. Teachings are magisterial when they are formulated in propositional form (not in weasel words) and do not contradict the Deposit of Faith. “Assisi 1986” is not part of the Magisterium.

Here is a bit of … interesting news, but partially obscured under a lot of smoke and pointing at imaginary squirrels.

Peter K alerted me to something at a substack called Frater Spiritus about the attempts of the Archbishop of Detroit to ban ad orientem worship.   In effect what the Archbp did was forbid priests from following the rubrics… which he can’t do.   Now, it seems that the Holy See has stepped up on the matter.

A reminder…

For those who do not remember, when Archbishop Edward Weisenburger was appointed to the Archdiocese of Detroit, he told local reporters that he “wasn’t coming to shake things up” and “would make the absolute minimal changes for his first year”.

His Excellency either has a bad memory about what he says or he was not being entirely honest.  Shortly after he arrived in Detroit he summarily sacked without review three distinguished professors at Sacred Heart Seminary and then devastated the people who desire traditional liturgy by suppressing TLMs all over the place.   Although… to be fair… it could be that he considers both of those actions to address things so unimportant that they barely count.

You will also recall that the Archbp issued in a public decree a total ban on priests celebrating Mass in ad orientem, hence requiring them to celebrate versus populum.

It seems someone in the pews, we don’t know who, asked the Vatican if this was actually allowed.

That first public decree has – surprise! – been changed.   However, the change to the decree was not at first made public.

The original decree is HERE.   You will note that in this draconian dig at the priests and people of Detroit, the signer – because it is inevitably his document – couldn’t even get “versus populum” right, instead writing “versus populo“.

Let me do what the Holy See did when they corrected the bad translation of GIRM 299 which led to all sorts of bishops trying to ban ad orientem worship and prompting destruction of altars.  That is, the Holy See explained the Latin so that bishops wouldn’t get it wrong.   Let’s have a look at versus.

Versus used as a preposition goes with the accusative, although its origin as an adverb helps explain why it can also appear after the noun it governs.   For example, we can say “versus orientem… Romam… occidentem…. toward the east (eastward)… toward Rome… toward the west (westward)”.   Versus also often occurs after ad and its accusative, stressing the direction… ad orientem versus… for example, “turned eastward”.  That ad indicates movement toward, as in “ad Romam proficiscitur… He set out for Rome”, which “Romam versus proficiscitur” would be “He sets out in the direction of Rome”.   In liturgical parlance we speak of Mass “versus populum… facing or turned toward the people” as well as “versus orientem… facing or turned toward the east”.  There also occurs Mass “ad orientem versus” and simply “ad orientem“.   It’s not that hard.

By the way, in legal and sporting terms we see something like Weisenberger v. (versus) The People of Detroit, that versus has taken on an adversarial meaning.   That doesn’t transfer to liturgical usage as in “versus populum… against the people”… or… maybe it does in the case of the abusive antics of dopey priests who dance around like idiots or bless people with guitars.  But I digress.

The change in the decree…

Are things as bad as the seem? Auctores scinduntur.

The Archbp of D wrote “versus populo“.  FAIL.

Also important for this issue is that the Latin rubrics in the Novus Ordo 3rd edition 2002 Missale Romanum describe the priest as “conversus ad populum… having turned toward the people”.  Here conversus is a participle and ad populum is a prepositional phrase.  The meaning is clear: the priest was facing toward something other than the people and then he turns to face the people.  The Missal explicitly uses versus ad altare (“facing toward the altar”) and ad altare conversus (“having turned toward the altar”).   In the Novus Ordo Missal in (rubrics) nn. 132–133: we find the priest versus ad populum “Facing toward the people, the priest says Ecce Agnus Dei.” Then, immediately afterward: “Et sacerdos, versus ad altare, secreto dicit: Corpus Christi custodiat me in vitam aeternam. … And the priest, facing toward the altar, says quietly: May the Body of Christ preserve me unto eternal life.”

To close this part out, when in the Lewis & Short Dictionary I checked some uses of versus looking for ablative or dative, I found this… it’s pure coincidence, of course…

Are things as bad as the seem? Auctores scinduntur.

GOING ON AT LAST…. the original decree HERE.   The irony drips from this screenshot (with my red underscore):

Are things as bad as the seem? Auctores scinduntur.

Firstly, he reserves to himself something that he doesn’t have control over.  The LATIN edition of the Missale Romanum is the STANDARD, not the translation.  A bishop can’t force a priest to disobey or change the rubrics.  He himself makes this exact point in the very next paragraph!

Moving on to a last point… take a look at Rorate which recounts that an important book about the antics of the Consilium (Bugnini and Co) is back in print.  It is based on notes and diaries of Ferdinando Card. Antonelli.   It deals with what happened many years ago, but those dealings impact the vast majority of Catholics today, because they changed how we pray.

The Development of the Liturgical Reform: As Seen by Cardinal Ferdinando Antonelli from 1948 to 1970 (Os Justi Studies in Liturgical History and Reform)

Are things as bad as the seem? Auctores scinduntur.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Drill | Tagged
9 Comments

ROME 26/10– Day 17-18: How very sad

ROME 26/10– Day 17-18: How very sadThe Eternal receive sunlight this morning at 07:24.

Deprivation of sunlight came at 18:26.

The Ave Maria for the Curia should be at 18:45.

The Ave Maria for solar time was at 17:56.

Today, in addition to being a Sunday, is the Feast of St. Luke.

ROME 26/10– Day 17-18: How very sad

Welcome Registrant:

Jsart170

ATTENTION KNOXVILLE!

And…

How very sad…. but they brought it on themselves.

With a little help from white, black brought mate on himself in 4.

ROME 26/10– Day 17-18: How very sad

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
12 Comments

WDTPRS – 21st Sunday after Pentecost: My strengths support yours.  My sins weaken us all.

Let’s have a look at the Collect for the upcoming Sunday in the TLM – 1962 Missale Romanum.

This Collect has been in use at least since the time of the Liber Sacramentorum Gellonensis, which is a variation of the ancient Gelasian sacramentaries of the Frankish tradition.  It survived the Novus Ordo Cutter-Snippers as the Collect for the 5th Sunday of Ordinary Time.

COLLECT (1962MR)

Familiam tuam, quaesumus,
Domine, continua pietate custodi:
ut a cunctis adversitatibus, te protegente, sit libera;
et in bonis actibus tuo nomini sit devota.

The first part was used almost like a template in other prayers, as in the Collect of the 5th Sunday after Epiphany: “Familiam tuam, quaesumus, Domine, continua pietate custodi, ut, quae in sola spe gratiae caelestis innititur, tua semper protectione muniatur.”

Note not only the similar beginning, but also a connection in the vocabulary with that form of protego.  This suggests to me that the prayers are related.

That word familia, though it seems so familiar, should have some attention.

Familia and forms of famulus occur often in our prayers.  Think of the line in the Roman Canon including “Memento, Domine, famulorum, famularumque tuarum… Be mindful, O Lord, of Your household servants and handmaids”.  These words look like “family”, as does familia, and that is often appropriate depending on the context.  However, the core meaning of the root of the word, fama, which comes from Latin’s ancient cousin Oscan must guide our minds to the whole body of people in an ancient household, including especially the servants.  The different words for “family” in Latin include all the servants and staff, with the extended family, not just the core.  The paterfamilias, “father of the family” had virtual power of life and death over most of his household and his word was law.

WDTPRS - 21st Sunday after Pentecost: My strengths support yours.  My sins weaken us all.Custodio, common in military language, means “to watch, protect, keep, defend, guard”. Pietas is complicated, as we have seen many times.  Obvious English “piety” comes from this, but the Latin is more involved.  Your helpful Lewis & Short Dictionary says pietas is “dutiful conduct toward the gods, one’s parents, relatives, benefactors, country, etc., sense of duty.” The classic application of pietas and the adjective pius is to the figure of Aeneas in the Latin poet Virgil’s Aeneid.  As Troy was being destroyed by the Greeks after the incident with the wooden horse, Virgil (+19 BC) has Aeneas carry his elderly father Anchises, with the family tutelary god, from the wreckage of the burning city while leading his little son along by hand.  This image of the man with his father on his back and his son by the hand perfectly expresses the duties Aeneas, future founder of what will become Rome, had toward his family, his pietas.  He was also scrupulous in relation to the gods.  So he is usually called pius Aeneas, which as you now know is far more complicated than the mere “pious Aeneas”.

Christians adapted ancient terms like this to a new context, to express new meanings. In Jerome’s Vulgate in both Old and New Testament pietas is “conscientiousness, scrupulousness regarding love and duty toward God.”  You see that the core of pietas remains “duty.”  Pietas is also one of the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit (cf. CCC 1831; Isaiah 11:2), by which we are duly affectionate and grateful toward our parents, relatives and country, as well as to all men living insofar as they belong to God or are godly, and especially to the saints.  In loose or common parlance, “piety” indicates fulfilling the duties of religion.  Sometimes “pious” is even used in a negative way, as when people take aim at external displays of religious dutifulness as opposed to what they is “genuine” practice (cf. Luke 18:9-14).

All this is involved when we use pietas to describe ourselves, what human beings have regarding, God, family, country, etc.   But in our prayer today, we are asking God to guard us with His pietas.

When we speak of the pietas of God, we are generally referring to His mercy toward us.  While it is not strictly right to imply that God has a duty toward us, He has made promises and God is true to His promises.  We can depend on Him not because He is obliged by pietas, as we are, but because He is loving and merciful.  So, God’s pietas towards us has a different tone altogether.

St. Thomas Aquinas explains how the gift of piety perfects the disposition by which we render reverence and service to God as Father (STh II-II, q. 121, a. 1, ).   God owes nothing to creatures considered in themselves. Nevertheless, because He has freely made promises, He is faithful to His own word. The divine pietas of this prayer expresses both His merciful care and His unwavering fidelity.

I note as well that in that line from the Canon I quoted above in respect to familia, down the line a bit, we come to the Latin word devotio.  We have a form of that word in today’s Collect.  There must be a connection between the concepts of familia, pietas and devota, an adjective connected with familia.

Your L&S reveals that devoto “to dedicate, devote” as well as “to bewitch, enchant” and, in a related sense, “to invoke with vows”, and by logical extension it comes to mean “to curse”, though clearly today’s use doesn’t bear that connotation.  In the French source for liturgical Latin we call Blaise/Dumas, we find that the adjective devotus, a, um has a special connection to devotion to service of the Lord.   We can also draw insight into what is really being said here by bringing in the force of devotio, an obvious derivative.  In classical usage devotio is “fealty, allegiance, devotedness; piety, devotion, zeal.” Devotio also means, as devoto implied, “a cursing, curse, imprecation, execration, a magical formula, incantation, spell.” Again, that is not our direction today.  Briefly, I hear devotio as “a devotion to duty”.  In that sense it picks up the meaning of pietas.  Our “devotion” leads us to keep God’s commandments and attend with focus to the duties of our state before all else.  If we are truly devout, pious, in respect to God, devoted to fulfilling the duties of our state in life truly is here and now, then God will give us every actual grace we need to fulfill our vocations. We are, in effect, fulfilling our proper role in His great plan and thus He is sure to help us.

God fulfills what He promises to us as we do our part in His plan in which He gave us a role from before the creation of the universe.

LITERAL TRANSLATION:

Guard your family, we beseech you,
O Lord, with continual mercy,
so that it may be free from all adversities
as You are protecting it,
and, in its good acts, may be devoted in Your Name.

This prayer speaks first of all to how interconnected we are as Catholic Christians.

By baptism, we are the adopted children of the Father.  We look to Him with the reverence of children, not merely as cowering slaves.  We belong to a family.  In the arc of our lives we have roles and states to fulfill.  Within the Church we have our manner of participation.  We are all in this together.  My strengths support yours.  My sins weaken us all.  My defeats become your concern. All our triumphs are shared as we raise them up to God.

In remembering our common bonds with each other in the Father, we must also remember a profound inequality in our bonds – children are no less members of the family than parents, but they are dependent they are not the equals of their parents.  God is not our peer.  We are not His equal.  We are all children before His gaze.

I am amused and horrified when I hear modernists, progressivist types suggest that modern man is all grown up now and that we no longer have to kneel as if cowering before a stern master God.

Our prayer gives us an image that runs very much contrary to the prevailing values of the last few decades, a period in which the family as a coherent recognizable unit has been systematically broken down.

Our Latin prayers often reflect the Church’s profound awareness of our lack of equality with God.

The prayers are radically hierarchical, just as God’s design reveals hierarchy and order.

The prayers are imbued with reverence.

Compare this attitude with prevailing societal norms.

Compare this with our ongoing trial by “synodality” (“walking togetherity”).

Lastly, it seems to me that there is a possible connection between the Collect and the Epistle of this very Sunday. In Ephesians 6:10–17, St. Paul urges Christians to put on the whole armor of God so that they may be protected from the attacks of the devil. The Collect asks God to protect His household from every adversity. Custodi, protegentе, and libera fit with the military language of the Epistle: armaturam Dei, insidias diaboli, scutum fidei, and galeam salutis.

The Church is God’s household, certainly, but also His army in the midst of spiritual combat. Her members are protected by God precisely so that they can do their duty.

Posted in WDTPRS |
1 Comment

A matter of grave concern: People who pray together before or after Mass.

The Bishop of Knoxville is on the job, addressing serious problems in the local church entrusted to his pastoral care.  If for nothing else he would be notable for the pogrom he conducted last October – he must have a thing for October – against people who desire the Traditional Latin Mass.   HERE

What’s his problem now? People who pray prayers together before or after Mass.  HERE

It came to the attention of Most Rev. Mark Beckman that in some churches people were praying well-known prayers together before or after Mass. For example, after Mass some people had the custom of reciting the Prayer to St. Michael the Archangel. Others pray the St. Francis’s Prayer or a Prayer to the Holy Spirit.

Can you imagine such a thing? Such a gross offence to… to… liturgical… thing?  Because… experts!  The bishop “reflected” about this grave situation and wrote the article I linked, above. Those prayers…

and others have been added regularly to the liturgy—recited together, sometimes before the entrance hymn, or immediately after the dismissal….

[…]

Having reflected on the importance of celebrating the liturgy in accordance with the mind of the Church, I do not think it appropriate to add additional prayers associated with the celebration of the Mass itself.

I hate to break the news here, but “before the entrance hymn” or “after the dismissal” are both outside of Mass.

“But Father!  Be fair!  He said ‘associated with the celebration of Mass'”!

Sorry.  I don’t believe people are stupid.  You would have to think they were pretty thick to imagine they don’t know when Mass starts and when Mass ends.

So, the only reasonable thing to do is to stop pious people from different walks of life who find themselves together in a church from praying together.

Once again we see an attempt to force people into a lock-step conformity which simulates a chimeric “unity”. After all, we can’t let people just, sit or stand when then want, or – quod Deus avertat – kneel for Communion.  We can’t have people praying together in a church before or after Mass, can we? That would be double-plus-ungood.

In a spirit of fairness, there could be a legitimate issue about collective prayer before Mass (Novus Ordo), since GIRM 45 says:

Even before the celebration itself, it is commendable that silence to be observed in the church, in the sacristy, in the vesting room, and in adjacent areas, so that all may dispose themselves to carry out the sacred action in a devout and fitting manner.

That said, perhaps the bishop would better spend his authority on what goes on in sacristies before Mass.  Is there silence and order?   My experience over the years is that sacristies are not bastions of silence and order before Mass.  Maybe that’s something His Excellency should attend to in his diocese.  That is certainly according to “the mind of the Church”.

Again in a spirit of fairness, if I had the opportunity, I would ask a question.

In consideration of the explicitly invoked “the mind of the Church”, which specific provision of the Roman Missal, the GIRM, the Code of Canon Law, or the Holy See’s 2001 Directory on Popular Piety forbids the faithful from voluntarily praying the St. Michael Prayer after the liturgical dismissal?  Until such a provision is identified, the claim that suppressing a longstanding devotional practice is required by “the mind of the Church” remains empty.

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", Liberals, Pò sì jiù, You must be joking! | Tagged
36 Comments

ROME 26/10– Day 16: Baronius… and traitors

ROME 26/10– Day 16: Baronius... and traitors

Not dirty.  Just etched from use.

I hope.

Welcome registrant:

Elizabeth T.

In the Chiesa Nuova.

ROME 26/10– Day 16: Baronius... and traitors

ROME 26/10– Day 16: Baronius... and traitors

White.  4.

ROME 26/10– Day 16: Baronius... and traitors

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

ROME 26/10– Day 15: munch

ROME 26/10– Day 15: munch

Pizza bianca and mortadella with black truffle.  DAMN.

ROME 26/10– Day 15: munch

Over at Pippo’s flower stand for a sit down and munch and chat.

ROME 26/10– Day 15: munch

I stopped to buy flowers for the apartment.  Say HI to Pippo and Anastasia!

From the top, I’ll remind you the REVIVED “Birettas For Seminarians Project” HERE Also, I can take some Mass intentions  HERE

And some medieval fun for Thursday…

And this about the increasingly deep synodaling dreck…

St Teresa would want you to figure it out.

ROME 26/10– Day 15: munch

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
12 Comments