ASK FATHER: For Benediction why the humeral veil?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Father, you posted about the Divine Praises and Benediction and there is a photo in the post of Benediction.   I’ve wondered about something for a while.  Most of us are revolted by the regular reception of Communion in the hand because of particles and because lay hands are not consecrated like priestly hands.   In some traditional parishes altar boys have to wear gloves to take the chalice to the altar or handle a communion plate.   But at Benediction, which lay people can’t do, the priest uses a humeral veil to hold the monstrance which is a sacred vessel for the Host.  What gives?

So, my question is, if the monstrance is a sacred vessel, and the priest’s hands are consecrated for sacred vessels, why does he have to use a humeral veil for Benediction?

Okay!  Good question.  Some one is observant and thoughtful.

Veils are so very important in the Roman Rite.  My dear long lost friend the late and great Extraordinary Ordinary, Bishop Robert C. Morlino (shall men like him ever be made bishops again instead of what we now…. ehem… *cough*…. ummm…), once said in a regular talk he gave the chancery staff, that things cannot be revealed unless they are first veiled.  Therefore, I love this question.

You are right about the difference between the hands of the laity and the hands of the priest.   One quibble I have with your question is that deacons can now give Benediction also.  Their hands are not consecrated.  They are, however, Ministers of the Eucharist.

The humeral veil at Benediction is used precisely to make a point: the benediction (blessing) is not given by the priest as a priest, but by Christ Himself in the Blessed Sacrament.

Hence, the veil reveals (to the thoughtful and observant) a distinction of agency.

For most blessings, the priest blesses in virtue of his sacred orders.  He is alter Christus, another Christ. He raises his consecrated hand and makes the sign of the Cross. At Benediction, however, he does not bless with his hand. He covers his hands, takes the monstrance, and makes the sign of the Cross with the Eucharistic Lord Himself.  It shows that the LORD is making the Sign of His Cross as a blessing using the hands of the alter Christus.

The veil visually effaces – de-faces – the minister. The veil, if it could speak, is saying: “This is not Father’s blessing!  This is the blessing of Jesus, truly present before your eyes.”

This also explains why the priest does not say the usual blessing formula, such as “Benedicat vos omnipotens Deus…”.  For the blessing, the priest is silent as the High Priest blesses His people.

There is also a reverential, ceremonial dimension. The humeral veil is an ornament of honor, used when handling what is especially sacred such as when at Solemn Mass the Subdeacon stands at the foot of the alter behind the priest with the paten covered up with the humeral veil which he holds in front of his own face as if to make himself symbolically disappear from view.

How wise were those who lovingly crafted the sacred Roman Rite, handed down lovingly, reverently, from generation to generation for so many centuries.  As they celebrated with it over time and reflected and prayed and meditated about the rites, they would from time to time apply a little polish to make it dazzle the more or perhaps to remove a little scratch.  Then came the rite-smashers of the 20th century with their arrogance, who handled the precious living gift, organically developed and venerated, and treated it like a lawn mower needing repair or a set of legos.   And what did they produce?  A noise machine that also has elements that hurt, such as when you step on a lego with the foot you made bear out of desire to approach the bush burning with mystery.

I digress.

Wrapped in the so-expressive veil of honor and eloquent mystery the priest, though ordained and consecrated, recedes behind the sacramental presence of the Lord. His consecrated hands are at the service of mystery. The humeral veil teaches the faithful to look beyond the minister to the One whom he bears.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
Leave a comment

Brooklyn 26/6 – Day 2: CHINESE

Let’s continue for today with sunrise and sunset in Rome, which respectively are 5:32 and 20:47.

Today, however, the Ave Maria cycle for the Curial ringing of the Ave Maria Bell has shifted into the 21:15 cycle.

But you all know what time it should ring according to the actual setting of the sun.

Don’t you.

And if you don’t, there’s the great APP.

My trips to and through Brooklyn will normally involve one big Chinese meal.   We over-ordered and brought goodies home.

We started and finished with

Then came the soup dumplings.   Always good.  Not the very best I’ve ever had, but quite good.

Because… veg…. right?

Wok seared cabbage and porkbelly.

Shrimp in garlic sauce.

Crispy shredded beef.

Working our way through the menu, peditemptim.

White to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

ASK FATHER: After Benediction why were the “Divine Praises” not in Latin?

The other day I posted a video of the final Benediction after our Corpus Christi procession.   A reader asked in a comment:

QUAERITUR:

Father why were the Divine Praises sung in Italian and not Latin?

I gave a very short answer, which, while accurate, prompts me add a little more for your benefit (even though I am sure you all are reading every single comment).

The Divine Praises, or Laudes Divinae, now so closely associated with Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament, began as a prayer of reparation.

Their author was Luigi Felici, S.J., born in 1736. Felici entered the Society of Jesus in 1756 and was ordained priest on 15 August 1773, the day before the suppression of the Society by Clement XIV of felicitous memory.  Felici retained the apostolic spirit of the Jesuits (back when they had one) and, in 1790, founded the “Pia Unione di S. Paolo Apostolo”, a charitable association devoted to the sick, the infirm, prisoners, soldiers, and those in moral danger.

The immediate setting of the Divine Praises was Felici’s work among the sailors of the Ripa Grande in Rome, a big bend in the Tiber not too far from The Parish™. These men were often rough in speech, hostile to religion, and given to blasphemy. In response, in 1797 Felici composed a short Italian prayer, the “Lauda Divina”, beginning “Dio sia benedetto… Blessed be God.” It was intended as an act of praise and atonement whenever the Holy Name, the mysteries of the faith, or sacred persons were insulted by profane speech.

The prayer’s structure is simple and powerful: each sort of blasphemy is answered by a blessing. Against contempt for God, Christ, the Holy Name, the Blessed Sacrament, the Holy Ghost, the Mother of God, and the saints, the Church places on the lips of the faithful a litany of praise. Over time, additional invocations were added, including references to the Immaculate Conception, the Assumption, the Sacred Heart, St. Joseph, and the Precious Blood.

Because Benediction culminates in adoration, that rite became their natural home. After the blessing with the monstrance, the faithful respond to the divine condescension with the solemn cry of reparation “Blessed be God.”

I know some Catholics, as I do myself, when they hear someone use the Holy Name in a blasphemous way, immediately respond “Praise His Holy Name!”

On another point, as I write this, I am thinking that in many places the “Just call me Bob” priests, perhaps with sundry head and/or attraction problems, do not have Eucharistic adoration at their parishes and, therefore, do not provide Benediction and the praying of the Divine Praises, which you know now were intended as reparation for blasphemies.  Probably also 15 minutes a week for confessions, too, if that.

What a sad thing to consider: there may be, probably are some newly built churches in these USA which have never, since they were opened, rung with the faithful praying the Divine Praises.

If some of you out there have never been to Exposition and Benediction, handled in the traditional manner, I urge you to seek it and experience it.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Hard-Identity Catholicism | Tagged
2 Comments

Brooklyn 26/6 – Day 1: catching up

Back in Rome the sun rose at 5:32 and it will set at 10:47. The Ave Maria Bell doesn’t ring for the Curia at 21:00.

However, here in Brooklyn, the sun came up at 5:24 and it will set at 20:26.  The Ave Maria will ring on my app at 20:56 (30 minutes after sunset).

Today is the 160th day of the civic calendar year and the Feast not only of St. Ephrem but also the incorrupt Anna Maria Taigi.

We went to a steak place last night for supper.

Which drink is mine?

Gotta have some oysters, right?

We shared a porthouse, which was quite good.  However, there was a hint of burnt garlic.   Stupid cook.

I wound up saving my salad for dessert.

Today I am taking it very easy and catching up on email, which has stacked up to the ceiling.   I suppose we will go out tonight for a burger or some chinese.  Either way, it’ll be great.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

Now, I should get back to my article prep.

Meanwhile, white to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

UPDATE: I hear a Robin singing away. How I miss the birds of the north.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments

ROME 26/6 – Day 76: Brooklyn Bound

The sun rises in a little while as I write, at 5:33.It will set at 20:46 over Rome, far behind me as I wing across the Atlantic.I won’t hear the Ave Maria Bell in the Curia (and noone else will) at 21:00.  It is on my app, however!  The Ave Maria Clock App!Because the migration of the blog screwed up a bunch of things, I can no longer integrate photos into posts that are underway.   So, I am crippled as to what I can do to update this along the way.Here are some shots I was sent from yesterday’s procession.I’ll work on a solution.And you can work on this solution.White to mate in 2.
Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

UPDATE

taking out the garbage before locking up

all these years I’ve not been in this one

security was really fast so I had a long wait in the general area – better than the dreadful lounge. Once was too many times.

I got bumped. Nice.

Se vedemo, Roma.

UPDATE (I hope this works)

UPDATE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
10 Comments

ROME 26/6 – Day 74-75: Last Day

For mt final full day for this sojourn the sun rose upon Rome at 5:33.

It will set at 20:46.

It is the 2nd Sunday after Pentecost, but in many places Corpus Christi has been transferred. Since Corpus Christi was on Thursday (the real day) in the Vatican City State, the curial calendar announces that it is the 10th Sunday of Ordinary Time.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

I think you can tell that I have just about run out of gas. The heat has really gotten to me over the last few days and I haven’t been doing much. At this time of year it is also humid here. The humidity seems really to soar in churches. Hence, after Mass you have to wring out your cassock. Today, we had a procession after Mass which took us to three area churches, sometimes moving under that Roman sun I mentioned at the top. We priests wore also a chasuble over our choir dress for the procession. I stayed in Rome some days longer to be able to participate in this beautiful event. At the same time, at the end we were pretty tapped out. It was 87°F (30.5C).  I’ve been taking on a lot of water. My cassock went out to the clothesline so that I can drench it through again during Vespers.

There was a professional photographer at Mass so I didn’t take many photos and I didn’t bring the phone during the procession. I’ll have to get shots from others. However, this is the final blessing, back in church.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

White to move and mate in 4.

UPDATE:

Oh yes, this was a bit unusual this morning for breakfast.

I also should post final ivy and jasmine reports.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
11 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes – Corpus Christi (transferred)

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for this Sunday, more than likely Corpus Christi transferred from Thursday?

Tell us about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

A taste of what I offered at 1 Peter 5 this week.  I wrote about the 2nd Sunday after Pentecost but related it to the great feasts nearby.

[…]

The fiery tongues of Pentecost have fallen. The ancient Ember Days have passed behind us. Trinity Sunday has crowned the revelation of the God who is Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. Corpus Christi has placed before our eyes the living Bread descended from heaven. In a handful of days, the Sacred Heart will show us the furnace from which that Bread was given, the pierced Heart from which the Church and the Sacraments flowed.

Now Holy Church clothes herself again in green, the color of hope and growth, and sends us into the long campaign of the Sundays after Pentecost.

This is the first green Sunday after the great Lent and Easter cycle, since Trinity Sunday takes the place of the First Sunday after Pentecost. It feels like an opening. This Sunday, the 2nd after Pentecost, brings us to the practical school of grace. The mysteries have been poured in. Now the Church says, in effect, “ITE.” Go. Live from them.

Dom Pius Parsch called the time after Pentecost a “Golden Bridge from Earth to Heaven.” He saw in these Sundays three great themes: Baptism and its graces, the long conflict between the two camps, and preparation for the Second Advent of the Lord. Every Sunday is a small Easter, because Baptism has plunged us into Christ’s death and resurrection. Yet Baptism has not transported us into a paradise without struggle. We remain placed in the kingdom of God while surrounded by the kingdom of the world. Adam’s legacy clings to us. Our souls waver. The Church, mother and fortress, trains us for battle. She feeds us with the Word. She strengthens us still more with Holy Communion. Another battles in us and for us: Christ, always Mightier, vanquishes the mundane mighty.

[…]

 

Posted in Sermons | Tagged
5 Comments

ASK FATHER: Why did dioceses stop using the word, “the” before words like “priesthood”, “Eucharist, or “Church?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Do you have any insight into why Dioceses stopped using the word, “the” before words such as “priesthood”, “Eucharist, or “Church”, etc? It irritates me, as well as makes me cringe when I read phrases such as, “it’s Jesus Christ who calls men to priesthood” or “discover if priesthood is your true vocation.”

Does it mean something different by not putting “the” before it?

It just really grinds my gears.

Yes. There is a real difference.

First, however, I think that people who do this simply want to sound more “theological” (i.e., smarter) than they really are.  They pick up this progressivist buzz language in order to sound sophisticated.

That said, taken at face value, there is a difference though could be stylistic rather than doctrinal.

In English, “the priesthood” normally means the priesthood as a definite, identifiable sacred order or state: the sacramental priesthood, the ministerial priesthood, the priesthood of Christ shared by ordained men. The article gives it concreteness and institutional weight.

By contrast, “priesthood” without the article treats the word more like an abstract mass noun, like “ministry,” “leadership,” “service,” “discipleship,” or “formation.” Thus:

“Christ calls men to the priesthood”

sounds like a call to a definite sacramental order in the Church.

“Christ calls men to priesthood”

sounds more abstract, professionalized, or vocational-office-like. It can sound as though “priesthood” is a field of service, a lifestyle category, or a career path.  What’s worse, it blurs the real difference between those who have the title of “priest”.  There are real priests, such as Catholic priests with valid orders, and there are wannabes in ecclesial communities without valid orders.

That is probably why it grates on your ear. The missing “the” subtly de-sacralizes the phrase by making “priesthood” sound less like an ontological sacramental state and more like a ministry-option.

The same thing happens with “Eucharist” and “Church.”

“The Eucharist” usually refers to the Sacrament: the Holy Eucharist, the Sacrifice of the Mass, the Real Presence, the sacramental reality instituted by Christ.

“Eucharist” without the article can be legitimate in some theological contexts. But in ordinary diocesan prose it often sounds as though “Eucharist” were an activity or value rather than the Most Blessed Sacrament.

Likewise:

“the Church teaches”

means the visible, historical, hierarchical, apostolic Catholic Church.

“Church teaches” or “being Church”

has a buzzy modern pastoral-register sound. It treats “Church” as a mode of communal identity or experience. It reflects a real shift in ecclesiological tone, from the Church as a definite divine society to “church” as a process, gathering, or communal self-expression.  Even a “walking together”!

So, does it always mean something different? Not always, strictly speaking. English permits anarthrous nouns, especially in institutional or abstract usage. One may say “go to school,” “enter ministry,” “serve in government,” “receive Communion,” “study theology.” In that sense, “discern priesthood” can be defended grammatically as elliptical for “discern a vocation to priesthood.”

However, in Catholic theological language, articles often matter because they preserve definiteness. “The priesthood,” “the Eucharist,” “the Church,” “the Mass,” “the sacred liturgy” all point to received realities, given before us, not invented by us.

So, in most diocesan vocation-copy, phrases like “called to priesthood” are probably influenced by modern ecclesial bureaucratese and the progressivist faux-sophisticated echo chamber, yet for the most part not all the writers intend something heterodox.  They’re just trying to sound deep.

“Called to the priesthood” is clearer, more Catholic-sounding, more traditional, and more theologically precise.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Priests and Priesthood |
17 Comments

ROME 26/6 – Day 72: hot (Novena Day 3)

On this First Friday of June the sun broke the plain at 5:33.

Not that long ago as I write, it sank again below at 20:44.

The Ave Maria Bell is in  the 21:00 cycle still.  But we know the truth.

Happy Feast of St. Boniface.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

What excitement was there today?

In no specific order of excitement…

I wrote my weekly piece for One Peter Five.

I got a haircut.

I did laundry.

I started my apartment shut down process.

I sweated through my vestments during Mass.

I had a “caprese” for lunch.

I did my language lessons and chess exercises.

White to move. Mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Novena to the Sacred Heart of Jesus

HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

ROME 26/6 – Day 71: Real Corpus Christi (Novena Day 2)

It was 26 minutes to 0600 when the sun rose in Rome.

It was 16 minutes to 2100 when the sun set.

The Curia is still in the 21:oo cycle for the Ave Maria Bell.

Today is the real Feast of Corpus Christi, though it is often transferred – lock and stock – to Sunday or, in more traditional celebrated again on Sunday so more people can partake.

Tonight we had a lovely Mass with good music and a Eucharistic procession inside the church.

First… what did I have, you wonder, for lunch?

An oldie but goodies.  My final pizza bianca and mortadella with truffle panino.

What a great combination and good for a hot day with cold Roman water.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Mate in 4. White to move.

In church tonight…

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

Also, Wesley BEAT Magnus… again, at Norway Chess. YAY

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments