Daily Rome Shot 1659

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

 

Black to move. Mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Also, I note with interest the pastoral letters issued by some bishops about the SSPX situation.  I mentioned the other day that I was please that a bishop openly said that he would be willing to talk to any SSPX priest who would approach him.  Some one sent me a note with letters from other bishops. Caggiano of Bridgeport makes an inviting appeal.  Burbidge of Arlington refers to his “brother priests” though he doesn’t explicit invite them.  Lucia of Syracuse, on the other hand, wrote a rather harsh letter, and seems to go a bit beyond what the Holy See so ineptly indicated about frequenting SSPX chapels.  He suggests that going to a SSPX chapel after reading his letter – even once – would be formal adherence to schism.  That can’t be, of course, but that’s the take away.   Moreover, they all repeat the claim the SSPX absolutions are now invalid.  They get that from the “Explanatory Note”.  The problem I see with that is that there is no clear legitimate statement that Leo XIV removed the faculty.  The Dicastery can’t do it without Leo.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
7 Comments

ALERT: The SSPX appeals against the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith

I was just alerted to this at Rorate.  I am glad to read this.  On the other hand, it might not go the way one might hope for.

The Society of Saint Pius X  (SSPX) filed an appeal against the decisions of the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) — a canonical possibility which we mentioned here the day following its publication.

Here is the Communiqué of the SSPX General House:

Communiqué of 13 July 2026.

The Society of Saint Pius X announces that, in response to the decree issued on 2 July 2026 by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, it submitted on 11 July a preliminary recourse to the same Dicastery, in accordance with canons 1734 and following of the Code of Canon Law.

This request, which constitutes the mandatory preliminary step before the possible introduction of a hierarchical recourse, has the effect of suspending the execution of the decree, in accordance with canon 1353 of the Code of Canon Law.

By this recourse, the Society intends to exercise the right which the Church recognizes to any person who considers himself harmed by an administrative act to seek its correction, in a spirit of respect for ecclesiastical authority and of faithful attachment to justice, truth and the good of the Church.

The Society of Saint Pius X entrusts this request to the competent authorities and commends this undertaking to the prayers of all the faithful.

Menzingen, 13 July 2026

Posted in SSPX | Tagged
12 Comments

Mass this afternoon – Unity of the Church… differently

Today at 1700 EDT I will say a Votive Mass “for the unity of the Church”, once called “ad tollendum schisma”.

Deus, qui errata córrigis,
et dispérsa cóngregas, et congregáta consérvas:
qu?sumus, super pópulum christiánum tuæ uniónis grátiam cleménter infúnde;
ut, divisióne rejécta, vero pastóri Ecclésiæ tuæ se úniens,
tibi digne váleat famulári.

O God, who settest straight what has gone astray,
and gatherest together what is scattered, and keepest what Thou hast gathered together:
we beseech Thee in Thy mercy to pour down on Christian people the grace of union with Thee,
that, putting disunion aside and joining themselves to the true Shepherd of Thy Church,
they may be able to render Thee worthy service.

Some will immediately think that this is aimed at the SSPX situation. While it is that, it is even more aimed at those who are clearly out of step with the Holy Catholic Church while still formally belonging to her. Those who tear at the unity of the Church through their ambiguous or heretical teaching, their twisted liturgical choices, their antinomialist anarchotyranny, their petty backbiting bullying and abuse of authority. These are the true underminers of the unity of the Church, not those who strive to preserve Tradition.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1658

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

Good news and bad news all at once…. According to Infovaticana, the North American Jesuits are reducing their novitiate locations from five to two. The two new novitiates will be located in Detroit (Michigan) and Culver City (California). Go woke. Go broke. And they are just about bankkrupt. I feel badly for the really great Jesuits who are trapped in that mess.

I simply must…

Black to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

My View For Awhile: homeward – CONCLUSION

Excitement… I got a note from Delta that my flight was delayed out of Philadelphia and I would not make my connection. I got on the computer and found an earlier flight which had been delayed since 0900! Hence, a rush to the airport in sort of awful conditions.

Sheets of rain. Still, they are telling us that we are going to leave.

The drive from the conference back to Philly was lovely. Lots of hills and lush green. Great cars, too.

When we got in and cleaned up, it was off to the Union League Club to meet priests for supper. Wonderful time.

That was just to start.

I’ll try to update along the way if my phone will cooperate.

UPDATE

After ANOTHER delay we are on board abd so is my bag.   What will happen next is anybody’s guess.

Now there is a fuel truck.

From what i can tell there was a problem with the original plane which is why this flight was originally at 0900.

They keep whittling away at my layover in ATL.

Onboard chess game is not very good.

More later.

UPDATE

AN HOUR LATER AND WE ARE STILL ON THE GROUND IN PHL

Will this trip never end?

Even if we can get on the way shortly. I don’t know about the connection.

UPDATE

They … damn … it’s complicated but I’m going to be stuck in Atlanta.

I sense a hotel in my future.

UPDATE 13 July

I got home eventually.   There were delays of weather.  They took us out to the runway, and then there was an engine issue and brought us back, half deplaned, then they changed their minds.  Meanwhile, seeing how this was going to go, I got with the gate agent and provisionally added a flight from ATL for the next morning. There was one slot. If I wouldn’t get that, I’d have to wait until Tuesday.

Very late, they took us to ATL.  On the place I booked a hotel room.  I got to get some sleep for about $60/hour.  That stings.

In the morning, off to ATL and breakfast in the lounge.   Everything went smoothly, except there was no trace of by bag.  I called the “medalion line”.  Zip.   On the ground, however, I got a text that my bag was delivered to my destinations baggage carousel at 02:30 AM.  Then I got a text that it was in the baggage service office.  Sure enough.   That means, I think that the final leg of my trip may have left at 01:00 plus change, but there were no boarding texts.  I guess they just flew the plane down because it was needed there in the morning.  I dunno.

That’s that.

Some images along the way.

Posted in On the road |
12 Comments

From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 26-06-23 – Toupee or not toupee

June 23rd 2026

Dear Diary,

I’m still worn out from the meeting in Orlando.  Damn its hot and humid there, not that I was out much.  Still, all that time with endless talking, blah blah.  The consecration thing was okay, but didn’t we do that before sometime?

Visited St. Mildred’s in Bellwether for the parish anniversary. Good lunch. Baked ham, potatoes with cheese, and three kinds of pie. I only tried two. Discipline.

Before Mass, three people asked me who the “new second priest” was. I told them I hadn’t sent anyone new and wondered what the VG had done without telling me. Again.  Or maybe it was just a visitor?    No, they said, he’s been here for several weeks.  Decent guy, bald, glasses.  Does pretty much everything Fr. Kevin does.  They ment Kevin Muldoon.

Apparently the bald priest with glasses says the early Mass they just put on the schedule a while ago, especially for farmers and farm workers. Then, at the afternoon Mass, Fr. Kevin shows up.  The new priest used the same vestments as Fr. Kevin. Same voice. Same homily, even same joke about the collection. Nobody knew his name. One lady thought he was a visiting mission preacher. Another said the two priests were brothers.

I asked Msgr. Tommy to investigate when he was at the chancery for something.  We had lunch… Montecristo sandwiches. He stared at me for a long time and said, “It’s Fr. Kevin.”

“Which one?”  “Both.”

Turns out Kevin is bald and he wears contacts.  Who knew?  In the morning he doesn’t bother with the rug and just wears his glasses.  After the morning Mass he puts on a toupay. Tommy says he calls it “pastoral presentation” and it seems that the rug cost $1800 from some place in Chicago and that Kevin had the parish pay for it under evangelization expenses.   I said that sounds creative. Tommy said it sounds like fraud.

Now that the word is getting out some wise guys at St, Mildred are requesting bulletin photographs for both priests. A guy on the parish council wants to call the early one “Father Kevin” and the later one “Father Kev.”

I suggested to Kevin that he has to pick one appearance. He asked which one. I said “whichever gets fewer complaints”.

Note: ask Finance if we can expense hair.  I could get a rug – or some patches – for Chester.

Posted in Diary of Bp. McButterpants | Tagged ,
5 Comments

Archbp. of Milwaukee reacts to the SSPX consecrations. Fr Z comments.

One bishop after another are issuing letters to their flocks in the wake of the SSPX episcopal consecrations.  Uniformly, they repeat a factual error in the “Explanatory Note” about the faculties of the SSPX to receive sacramental confessions and validly absolve.   In sum: since a Pope gave the faculty, a Pope has to remove it.  Also, the “Explanatory Note” doesn’t have any juridical force.

Error aside, there is something good in this letter for Milwaukee.

Here is the text of Archbp. Grob’s letter.  My emphases and comments.


Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,

On July 1, 2026, bishops of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) consecrated four priests as bishops without the mandate of the Holy Father and against his expressed will. On July 2, the Holy See declared that the bishops who carried out these consecrations and those who received them committed schismatic acts and incurred automatic excommunication. This is a sorrowful moment for the whole Church, and I share that sorrow with you.

I write to you today because this decision by the Society’s leadership has legitimate consequences for the faithful of this local church, especially for the faithful who have worshipped at St. Pius V Chapel in Mukwonago.

To state those consequences plainly, know first that the Holy See has declared that the clerics of the Society now administer the sacraments illicitly, and, that the confessions they hear and the marriages at which they assist are invalid. [It is hard to imagine that bishops will want to grant delegation for marriages now that this has happened, but, again, this is something that Francis gave, not the Dicastery.  If you accept that Francis was Pope  – some people don’t think he was but I suspect most American bishops do – then we have to have clarity about the issue of valid confessions and marriages.  This next part…] Anyone with questions about a marriage already celebrated, or about any particular situation, is welcome to contact the Chancery or the Metropolitan Tribunal, and they will help you. [This is very good.  This is an invitation to those who may have doubts, offering a route to clarity about the status of their marriage and a path towards regularization.]

Furthermore, to those who have attended the liturgies of the Society of St. Pius X, let me also offer a word of reassurance. The Holy See itself has made clear that this excommunication does not fall upon those who attended these liturgies simply out of love for the sacred liturgy, and who have never rejected the Holy Father or the teaching of the Church. I know that this describes many of you and of the strength of your families, your reverence, and the seriousness with which you pass on the faith to your children. However, knowing the situation as it now stands, such persons must simply resolve not to continue to participate in future SSPX sacramental worship or pastoral ministry[It’s a little more complicated than that.  There are reasons provided for in law by which people might be able to frequent Masses of SSPX chapels.  What is necessary is that people not attend them out of a schismatic motive.]

Furthermore, I would remind the faithful of our local church that the Mass celebrated according to the 1962 Missal, is offered in full communion with the Church here throughout this Archdiocese at multiple locations. I would especially highlight the reverent sacramental care provided at St. Stanislaus Oratory in Milwaukee, where the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest offers the traditional Latin Mass and sacraments each day.  [Channeling our inner Oliver, please, Archbishop, may we have some more? Note this next part…]

To any priest of the Society who is weighing what these events mean for his priesthood, know that the Holy See has established a path for your reconciliation, and that I will receive any such request with what the Holy See itself has asked of me: through listening and cordial availability, remaining especially mindful of the human and spiritual weight such a decision carries.  [I think this is terrific.  I haven’t yet seen anything like this in the letters of other bishops.  Please, dear readers, if you know of another, please let me know.   The Archbishop has offered an open door, at least for … something.  Would that more bishops were this open.  I hope that that “human and spiritual weight” part means that he knows that these priests will not want to use the Novus Ordo. I am minded of “back in the day” when it was desperately hard for SSPX priests to find a bishop.  I remember several cases, both sad and also joyful.  What I would also like to see – PLEASE GOD – bishops who don’t just say, “okay you can come, I guess”, but perhaps to reach out and invite priests.  And this extends beyond the SSPX.  There are any number of priests who have been cancelled or semi-cancelled, who are perfectly sound but their bishops won’t treat them with decency because they are too “traditional”.  What I would like to hear, and frankly despair of hearing is not “okay, I guess you can come”, but rather, “Please, do come.”  That makes all the difference.]

The Church has labored for decades toward the full reconciliation of the Society, under St. John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, and now Leo XIV. That labor has been gravely harmed by the acts of July 1, but the Church does not stop praying for unity, because Christ Himself prayed for it on the night before He died, that they may all be one (John 17:20-23). [Prayer is great.  However, as in our individual lives, we need concrete deeds as well.  Otherwise, the intention seems a little vaporous.]

I entrust all those affected by this moment to the intercession of Our Lady, Mother of the Church, and I assure you of my prayers,

Yours in Christ,

Most Reverend Jeffrey S. Grob
Archbishop of Milwaukee

Posted in SSPX | Tagged ,
9 Comments

WDTPRS – 7th Sunday after Pentecost: God can neither deceive nor be deceived

In the traditional Roman calendar this Sunday is the 7th Sunday after Pentecost.

Today’s Collect survived the cutting and pasting experts of the Consilium to live on as the Collect for the 9th Sunday of Ordinary Time.

COLLECT (1962MR):

Deus, cuius providentia in sui dispositione non fallitur
te supplices exoramus,
ut noxia cuncta submoveas,
et omnia nobis profutura concedas
.

Note the use of the trop homoioteleuton (same ending in corresponding elements) in submoveas and concedas.  The last two clauses, cola, both have preposition prefixes and the structure is the same.

Blaise/Chirat (a dictionary of Latin in French) indicates that dispositio is “disposition providentialle”. It has to do God’s plan for salvation. Fallo is an interesting word. It means basically, “to deceive, trick, dupe, cheat, disappoint” and it has as synonyms “decipio, impono, frustror, circumvenio, emungo, fraudo”. Fallo is used to indicate things like simply being mistaken or being deceived. It can apply to making a mistake because something eluded your notice or it was simply unknown. In our Latin conversation it is not uncommon to say nisi fallor, “unless I am mistaken…”. If you look for submoveo you may have to check under summoveo. Find profutura under prosum. Don’t confuse noxia with noxa.

SUPER LITERAL WDTPRS VERSION:

God, whose providence is not circumvented in its plan,
humbly we implore You,
that You clear away every harmful thing
and grant us all things beneficial
.

There is no getting around or circumventing God’s plan.

Why, given who God is and who we are, would we want to try?

But we do, don’t we.

We have to make a choice about which way to go with noxia.  Does it mean “harmful things” that are outside us or that are within us, that is, our own sins, our faults?  Both?

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973 9th Sunday Ordinary Time):

Father, your love never fails. Hear our call. Keep us from danger and provide for all our needs.

ROFL! Quite simply dreadful.  This may be one of the worst I have ever seen.  But we NEVER have to HEAR IT AGAIN.

CURRENT ICEL (2011  9th Sunday Ordinary Time):

O God, whose providence never fails in its design, keep from us, we humbly beseech you, all that might harm us and grant all that works for our good.

We have to make a choice about which way to go with noxia.  Does it mean “harmful things” that are outside us or that are within us, that is, our own sins, our faults?  Both?
God knows who we are and what we need far better than we can ever know ourselves.

The petition of this Collect closely corresponds to the final petitions of the Our Father: et ne nos inducas in tentationem; sed libera nos a malo, “and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.” The expression noxia cuncta, “all harmful things,” embraces both tentationes, temptations, and mala, evils. This correspondence is entirely fitting, since the Our Father, the most perfect of all prayers, provides the fundamental pattern for the Church’s official prayer.

The opening clause establishes the horizon for everything which follows. Divine providence does not miscalculate. God does not discover unforeseen obstacles, revise His eternal wisdom, or lose control of the field. Dispositio is an arrangement, the structure of a discourse, and also the drawing up of forces for battle. Through the Logos, the Word who is divine reason and perfect discourse, all things were made and ordered. We were called into existence in a time, place, state, and network of duties. The circumstances in which fidelity must bear fruit are encompassed within providence.

Foreseeing all our sins and many faults, all that we say and do is embraced in His eternal plan.

He has disposed all things so as to make glorious things result from the evils for which we alone are responsible.

Sometimes, moreover, it is hard to understand that God actually cares are us.  Given how immeasurably vast God is and how small we are, it is easy for some, mired in earthly distractions, to lapse into sort of deism and imagine a God who created everything and then, like a clock maker, just set the pendulum to swing and stepped away.

There is an old adage that, if you want to know if God is interested in you, just make a plan.

It is good for us each day never to forget to make an Act of Faith, which is a good Trinitarian prayer.

O my God, I firmly believe that Thou art one God in Three Divine Persons, Father, Son and Holy Ghost. I believe that Thy Divine Son became Man, and died for our sins, and that He will come to judge the living and the dead. I believe these and all the truths which the Holy Catholic Church teaches, because Thou hast revealed them, Who canst neither deceive nor be deceived.

 

Posted in WDTPRS |
Leave a comment

Daily Rome Shot 1657 – new life

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

I’m glad that Rorate picked this up. I tried to get it from Le Figaro yesterday, but there is a paywall in place that I couldn’t get around.

This Saturday, July 11th, Notre-Dame de Bellefontaine Abbey officially receives a new monastic community. For Dom Louis-Marie, Abbot of Le Barroux, the decision is above all the fruit of spiritual discernment: “From the beginning, it has been a matter of following the signs of heaven and the signs of the Lord.”

On November 13, 2025, the last Trappist monks departed Notre-Dame de Bellefontaine Abbey, bringing to a close more than two centuries of uninterrupted presence at this monastery in the Mauges region. The future of the site remained uncertain. This Saturday, July 11th, a new chapter opens with the official installation of twelve monks from the Abbey of Sainte-Madeleine du Barroux, who now ensure the continuity of a monastic life nearly a thousand years old.

This arrival is far more than a simple replacement of one community by another. It marks the return of Benedictines to a monastery whose origins reach back to the early twelfth century.

There’s more. This is like a balm for the soul. I have no doubt whatsoever that this foundation from Le Barroux will flourish and, perhaps in its own time, renew monastic life in another worthy and salvageable monastery. You can hear the office chanted by the monks at Le Barroux HERE.

But the TLM must be suppressed in favor of the one “unique” Roman Rite… right?

White to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1656 – different stuff

Welcome registrant:

FrGabriel

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

 

And… an analogy for how smoothly the Church has been running post Vatican II…

And…

And…. QUAERITUR… have you read it?

White to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll excommunicate comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Fifty years ago on 10 July 1976, Viktor Korchoi defected from the USSR while he was in Amsterdam. HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments