ASK FATHER: Lay people, SSPX and excommunication

I have several of these in my mail box, similar situations.

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I am a lay person who attends a diocesan Latin Mass with my family. On occasion, we attend SSPX Masses or devotions out of necessity or for special reasons (e.g. travelling, a baptism, Mass at our parish is cancelled.)

The recently published  procedures for reconciling lay people from the SSPX seems to take for granted that everyone is either SSPX or not; it doesn’t really account for those of us who are comfortable with going to both. Are we good to keep going the way we are? Am I correct in understanding the document that those of us who go to the SSPX on occasion are not really of any concern to the DDF?

I don’t think you have anything to worry about.

Sorry about the short response, but I am packing for a trip.

I’m also sorry for the way this situation has inflicted doubts and anxiety on so many people.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, ASK FATHER Question Box, SSPX | Tagged ,
Leave a comment

Daily Rome Shot 1654: facade

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

Welcome Registrant:

DJM

And…

White to mate in 2.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Interested in learning?  Try THIS.

Hey Fathers!  How about a clerical Guayabera shirt?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

The Bishop of Salt Lake City reduces priests celebrating the TLM, despite conversions of Mormons

The other day, I asked “What’s going on?”

Another.

I am sure we will learn more.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments

The DDF’s procedures for “reconciling” both clerics and lay people from the SSPX

Today the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) released – along with the decree and explanatory note about the SSPX – the requirements for clerics (deacons and priests, according to the 1983 Code) seeking reconciliation with the Church.  HERE  Also, the DDF details the procedure for reconciliation of clerics and or lay people, putting lay people into a couple of categories.  I have all four of these here, starting with the Formula of Adherence and Profession of Faith and then the two practical documents.

As part of that process, clerics must make the same profession of faith required of all clerics before ordination and of anyone before assuming legitimate ecclesiastical office. It is, basically, the Creed.

They must also sign a “Foruma Adhesionis”, a declaration of adherence to several points.  Those points include fidelity to the Catholic Church and the Roman Pontiff, refraining from public declarations opposed to his person or to the Magisterium.

Also, they must accept the doctrine taught in Lumen Gentium 25 concerning the Church’s Magisterium and the adherence due to it, even when it isn’t an infallible teaching, and respecting the teachings which require assent.  The cleric says he will have a positive interpretation regarding Vatican II and later liturgical and canonical reforms “quae aliquibus difficulter cum praecedentibus Magisterii declarationibus conciliari posse videntur … which can seem difficult to reconcile with previous declarations of the Magisterium.”  In other words, don’t automatically stick to a negative interpretation.

Then, the cleric accepts the validity (it does not say superiority or uniqueness, etc.) of the Mass and Sacraments celebrated with the intention of doing what the Church does, according to the rites found in the typical editions of the Roman Missal and the Rituals issued by Pope Paul VI and Pope John Paul II.  We can look around and see a lot of Masses which, to the objective viewer, don’t adhere to the rubrics and do not seem to intend what the Church intends.  Bottom line: don’t say the Novus Ordo is invalid.

Other steps include, of course, finding a bishop willing to take responsibility for you, at least experimentally, for a year.

They are supposed to sign that.  Here it is…


FORMULA OF ADHERENCE

Pledge my fidelity to the Catholic Church and to the Roman Pontiff, the Supreme Shepherd of the Church, Vicar of Christ, Successor of Blessed Peter in his Primacy, and Head of the College of Bishops, refraining from any public declaration that would be contrary to his person or to his Magisterium (cf. canons 1373 and 1365 of the Code of Canon Law).

I accept the doctrine set forth in No. 25 of the Dogmatic Constitution *Lumen Gentium * of the Second Vatican Council regarding the Magisterium of the Church and the obligation to adhere to it. With regard to certain doctrines taught by the Second Vatican Council, or regarding subsequent reforms—whether of the Liturgy or of Canon Law—which some find difficult to reconcile with previous declarations of the Magisterium, I undertake the obligation to follow a positive approach to interpreting doctrine under the guidance of the Magisterium, so that no one may separate it from the rest of the Church’s sacred doctrinal heritage.

I also declare that I accept validity of the Sacrifice of the Mass and the Sacraments celebrated with the intention of doing what the Church does, and according to the rites found in the official editions of the Roman Missal and the Rituals published by the Supreme Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II.

Finally, I promise to adhere to the common discipline of the Church and its laws, first and foremost those contained in the Code of Canon Law promulgated by Pope John Paul II

I have signed all of the above with my own hand,

In loco

Date


 

PROFESSIO FIDEI

I , ___

in good faith, believe and profess all and every thing contained in the Symbol of Faith, namely:

I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible, and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, born of the Father before all ages, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, of one substance with the Father, through whom all things were made; who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the Virgin Mary, and became man; He was also crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, suffered, and was buried; and He rose again on the third day according to the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of the Father, and will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, whose kingdom will have no end; and in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son; who, together with the Father and the Son, is worshiped and glorified, who spoke through the prophets; and in the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church. I confess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen. (i),/ i With firm faith I also believe all that is at is contained in the Word of God, whether written or handed down, and which the Church, either by solemn judgment or by her ordinary and universal Magisterium, proposes as to be believed as divinely revealed.

I also firmly embrace and uphold all and every teaching regarding the doctrine of faith or morals definitively taught by the Church. Furthermore, with religious obedience of will and intellect, I adhere to the doctrines proclaimed by either the Roman Pontiff or the College of Bishops when they exercise the authentic Magisterium, even if they do not intend to proclaim them definitively at that moment.

In loco

Date


Another document gives the procedure or praxis for reconciliation of SSPX priests.  In a way, this is their way around establishing another “Ecclesia Dei” Commission.

DICASTERY FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH
PROCEDURE FOR THE RECONCILIATION OF PRIESTS COMING FROM THE PRIESTLY FRATERNITY OF SAINT PIUS X

The procedure followed by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, effective July 1, 2026, stipulates that a priest who has decided to leave the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X, and who is willing to accept the Second Vatican Council and the legitimacy of the novus ordo Missae, even while remaining attached to the usus antiquior, must:

1) Find an Ordinary (diocesan Bishop, Major Superior of clerical religious institutes of pontifical right, of clerical societies of apostolic life of pontifical right, etc.) willing to receive him ad experimentum.

2) Write a letter in his own hand to the Holy Father, introducing himself and requesting the remission of the censures incurred either because he received ordination from an excommunicated or irregular Bishop, or because—having been validly and legitimately ordained—he subsequently joined the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X.

3) Attach the certificate of priestly ordination.

4) Attach the *Professio fidei* and the *Formula adhaesionis*, dated and signed (cf. attachments a-c).

5) Have the three aforementioned documents sent to the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith by the Ordinary, who shall indicate in the covering letter his willingness to receive the priest *ad experimentum* into his Diocese or Institute.

Upon receipt of the three documents from the Ordinary, the Dicastery shall draft the Rescript remitting the censures, which will be signed by the Prefect and the Secretary of the Doctrinal Section.

The Dicastery will send the said Rescript to the Ordinary, accompanied by a letter authorizing the acceptance of the requesting priest for a probationary period of at least one year and no more than three years, at the end of which his incardination may proceed.

It has recently been decided that, should the established probationary period prove unsuccessful, the Ordinary shall return the Rescript to the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, enclosing a report detailing the reasons why incardination did not take place.


Another document outlines the reconciliation of lay people.

DICASTERY FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH
PROCEDURE FOR THE RECONCILIATION OF CERTAIN LAY PERSONS COMING FROM THE PRIESTLY FRATERNITY OF SAINT PIUS X

This procedure concerns the question of imputability, or the degree of subjective responsibility, of lay faithful who have formally joined or who frequent the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X and who seek to enter into full communion with the Catholic Church.

The imposition of a penalty on lay persons belonging to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X cannot be presumed automatically but must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Since imputability requires full awareness and deliberate consent, examples of proven imputability may include:

1. Lay persons belonging to the Third Order of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X;
2. Lay persons who habitually participate in the celebrations of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X while formally sharing its doctrinal positions.

Conversely, the following are not to be considered imputable:

3. Lay persons who have frequented the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X solely for liturgical or spiritual reasons;
4. Lay persons who, despite being aware of the tensions with the Holy See, do not reject the Magisterium or the authority of the Roman Pontiff.

The procedure to be followed for lay persons belonging to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X—upon whom a penalty has been imposed and who seek to enter into full communion with the Catholic Church—entails a formal act of full adherence to doctrine and obedience to the Catholic hierarchy, under the jurisdiction of the local Ordinary, who is the guarantor of the unity of the particular Church.

Therefore, a lay faithful person, as referred to in nos. 1-2, who has decided to leave the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X must:

• Submit the Professio fidei and the Formula adhaesionis, dated and signed, to the local Ordinary (cf. Attachments A-B [ABOVE]).

Once the documentation has been received, the local Ordinary will arrange to welcome the lay faithful in the manner and timeframe he deems most appropriate—for instance, by using the Rite of Admission to Full Communion with the Catholic Church for those already validly baptized, duly adapted.

As for the lay faithful referred to in nos. 3-4, it suffices for them to approach a priest in full communion, having resolved not to frequent the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X in the future.


As for that last bit, “approach a priest in full communion”… that pretty much means “go to church” or “go to Mass” or “go to confession”.  Nothing outward is required.  You don’t have to say anything about the SSPX or what you are doing or intend.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, SSPX |
30 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1653: Pius X’s caption call

Caption call.

Welcome registrants:

Brendan Doyle
cburkhart09
mmromani@******.com
Rujo43

SSPX bishops excommunicated.  Meanwhile…

And… Will we see more of this? Someone start making a list!

Black to move.  Mate in 4.

NB: I’ll excommunicate comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

What constitutes “formal adherence” to schism? It is NOT merely attending Masses. There’s more to it.

The Explanatory Note from the DDF today references the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts’s Explanatory Note on the excommunication for schism incurred by adherents of the movement of Bishop Marcel Lefebvre of 24 August 1996. The DDF says they adopted this as their own. Hence, when the DDF talks about adherence to schism, we can refer to the Pontifical Council’s document for guidance. What does it say about “formal adherence”.  My emphases

5. As stated in Motu Proprio n. 5 c), latae sententiae excommunication for schism concerns 1 those who “formally adhere” to the said schismatic movement. Although the question regarding the exact scope of the notion of “formal adherence to the schism” should be referred to the competent Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, it seems to this Pontifical Council that such adherence must imply two complementary elements:

a) one of an internal nature, consisting in freely and consciously sharing the substance of the schism, that is, in opting in such a way for the followers of Lefebvre that this option is placed above obedience to the Pope (at the root of this attitude there will usually be positions contrary to the Magisterium of the Church);

b) another of an external nature, consisting in the externalization of that option, the most evident sign of which will be the exclusive participation in the Lefebvrian “ecclesial” acts, without taking part in the acts of the Catholic Church (this is, however, a non-univocal sign, since there is [NB] the possibility that some faithful may take part in the liturgical functions of Lefebvre’s followers without sharing their schismatic spirit).

Therefore, if a person is simply going to SSPX Masses because – for example – the local bishop has callously snuffed them out locally, without necessarily agreeing with the positions of the SSPX about (*whatever*), then he doesn’t not formally adhere to schism and does not incur an excommunication latae sententiae.

As the Explanatory Note of the Council continues:

7. In the case of the other faithful, however, it is obvious that occasional participation in liturgical acts or activities of the Lefebvrian movement—undertaken without adopting the movement’s attitude of doctrinal and disciplinary disunity—is not sufficient to constitute formal adherence to the movement. In pastoral practice, judging their situation may prove more difficult. Account must be taken, above all, of the person’s intention and the manifestation of that interior disposition in outward actions. Consequently, the various situations must be judged on a case-by-case basis within the competent fora (external and internal).

Given the way law is interpreted in the Church, I would conclude not only “occasional” but also “exclusive”.

Say Joe Badofdonuts is going only to the SSPX chapel on Sunday mornings for Mass, but he also attends his territorial parish for confession and other services.  His participation at the SSPX chapel on Sunday is not exclusive.

Furthermore, I agree with Ed Peters: that category – latae sententiae – should be abolished.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, SSPX | Tagged ,
14 Comments

2nd Joyful Mystery: The Visitation (Traditional observance 2 July)

In the traditional calendar, the Feast of the Visitation, 2 July, came at the end of the long-suppressed Octave of John the Baptist.  In the Novus Ordo it now falls on 31 May, between the Annunciation and the Birth of John the Baptist.

Here is something that I wrote years ago for the Patristic Rosary Project.

___

We continue our Patristic Rosary Project today with:

2nd Joyful Mystery: The Visitation

Commenting on Luke 1:39-45, the when Mary journeys to visit her cousin Elizabeth, St. Augustine of Hippo (+430) speaks of the infant John, to be known as the Baptist, leaping in the womb at the sound of Mary’s voice:

We see instances of leaping not only in children but even in animals, although certainly not for any faith or religion of rational recognition of someone coming.  But this case stands out as utterly uncommon and new, because it tool place in the womb, and at the coming of her who was to bring forth the Savior of mankind.  Therefore this leaping, this greeting, so to speak, offered to the mother of the Lord is miraculous.  It is to be reckoned among the great signs.  It was not effected by human means by the infant, but by divine means in the infant, as miracles are usually wrought. [ep 187.23]

God wrought something in John at that moment.  What happened?  We can look to the Greek writer Origen (+ c.254) for his view:

Elizabeth, who was filled with the Holy Spirit at that moment, received the Spirit on account of her son.  The mother did not inherit the Holy Spirit first.  First John, still enclosed in her womb, received the Holy Spirit.  Then she too, after her son was sanctified, was filled with the Holy Spirit.  You will be able to believe this if you also learn something similar about the Savior.  (In a certain number of manuscripts, we have discovered that blessed Mary is said to prophesy.  We are not aware of the fact that, according to other copies of the Gospel, Elizabeth speaks these words of prophecy.)  Mary also was filled with the Holy Spirit hen she began to carry the Savior in her womb.  As soon as she received the Holy Spirit, who was the creator of the Lord’s Body, and the Son of God began to exist in her womb, she too was filled with the Holy Spirit.  [Homilies on the Gospel of Luke 7.3]

The concept of being “filled with the Holy Spirit” is interesting.  Perhaps some of you have heard of the glosses on this phrase which compare the Blessed Virgin, John the Baptist, and St. Stephen.  All were said to be filled with the Holy Spirit.  Mary was prevented from ever having any stain of original sin.  John was said to have been forgiven the guilt of original sin before his birth, which is the moment he leapt in the womb at the coming of the Lord.  Stephen, the Protodeacon, was also “filled with the Holy Spirit”, but after his birth.  In any event, the always creative and interesting Origen speaks of John’s sanctification in the womb at the coming of Mary who was bearing the Son of God.

Each of us must prepare to bear Christ and be filled with the Holy Spirit.  St. Ambrose, the bishop of Milan (+397) said:

You see that Mary did not doubt, but believed and therefore obtained the fruit of faith.  “Blessed … are you who have believed.”  But you also are blessed who have heard and believed.  For a soul that has believed has both conceived and bears the Word of God and declares His works.  Let the soul of Mary be in each of you, so that it magnifies the Lord.  Let the spirit of Mary be in each of you, so that it rejoices in God.  She is the one mother of Christ according to the flesh, yet Christ is the Fruit of all according to faith.  Every soul receives the Word of God, provided that, undefiled and unstained by vices, it guards its purity with inviolate modesty.  [Exposition of the Gospel of Luke 2.26]

Our baptism should remind us every day that we are deeply woven into the fabric of the Church, a Church which in many ways can said to stretch back into the depths of our great “Family History”  as God’s People.  In a comment on the Magnificat, which Mary pronounced during her mysterious Visitation, Venerable Bede (+735) says:

When blessed Mary was making mention of the memory of the fathers, she properly represented them by naming Abraham in particular.  Although many of the fathers and holy ones mystically brought forward testimony of the Lord’s incarnation, it was to Abraham that the hidden mysteries of this same Lord’s incarnation and of our redemption were first clearly predicted.  Also, to him it was specifically said, “And in you all the tribes of the earth witll be blessed.” (Gen 12:3)  None of the faithful doubts that this pertains to the Lord and Savior, who in order to give us an everlasting blessing deigned to come to us from the stock of Abraham.  However, “the seed of Abraham” does not refer only to those chosen ones who were brought forth physically from Abraham’s lineage, but also to us…. Having been gathered together to Christ from the nations, we are connected by the fellowship of faith to the fathers, from whom we are far separated by the origin of our fleshly bloodline.  We too are the seed and children of Abraham since we are reborn by the sacraments of our Redeemer, who assumed his flesh from the race of Abraham.  [Homilies on the Gospels 1.4]

Did you catch that great phrase?  “Mary was making mention of the memory of the fathers…”  Perhaps we can see how the Blessed Virgin is a good model for all patristicists and, of course, patristibloggers!

Posted in Linking Back, Our Solitary Boast |
1 Comment

The 6 SSPX Bishops excommunicated. Priests are in schism. Marriages invalid. Absolutions invalid. Lay faithful warned against schism and excommunication.

I am very sad today.

Vatican website DECREE and NOTE


DECREE (my emphases)

Despite the warnings addressed to the Superior General of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X, Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta, having committed an act of a schismatic nature by the episcopal consecration of four priests without pontifical mandate and against the will of the Supreme Pontiff, has incurred ipso facto the penalties foreseen by Canon 1387 and Canon 1364 § 1 of the 2021 Code of Canon Law.

I therefore declare, with all juridical effects, that both the aforementioned Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta and Pascal Schreiber, Michael Goldade, Michel Poinsinet de Sivry, and Marc Hanappier have incurred ipso facto the excommunication latae sententiae reserved to the Apostolic See.

I further declare that Bishop Bernard Fellay, having participated directly in the liturgical celebration as a co-consecrator, thereby publicly adhering to the schismatic act, incurred the excommunication latae sententiae provided for by Canon 1364 § 1 of the 2021 Code of Canon Law.

Clerics and lay faithful are warned not to adhere to the schism of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X, because they would thereby incur ipso facto the penalty of excommunication latae sententiae.

From the Palace of the Dicastery, 2 July 2026

Víctor M. Card. Fernández
Prefect

John J. Kennedy
Arcivescovo tit. di Ossero
Segretario per la Sezione Disciplinare

Mons. Armando Matteo
Segretario per la Sezione Dottrinale


DICASTERY FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH

Prot. No. 99/2009

EXPLANATORY NOTE

From the time of Saint Paul VI up to the most recent discussions held at this Dicastery, numerous attempts to bring the adherents of the movement begun by Msgr. Marcel Lefebvre back into full communion with the Catholic Church have been in vain. This situation has been further aggravated by recent episcopal consecrations performed without a pontifical mandate, against the will of the Holy Father, and in open violation of canon law. Therefore, this Dicastery, in the faithful exercise of the functions entrusted to it, deems it necessary to point out that this act constitutes the crime of schism, with canonical consequences for the sacred ministers and lay faithful involved. Indeed, as was already declared in 1988, “such disobedience, which implies a practical rejection of the Roman Primacy, constitutes a schismatic act” (cf. John Paul II, Apostolic Letter Ecclesia Dei, 3).

In this regard, henceforth:

1. Sacred ministers belonging to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X are in a state of schism and must therefore be considered schismatics (cf. Ecclesia Dei, 5 c; Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, Explanatory Note on the excommunication for schism incurred by adherents of the movement of Bishop Marcel Lefebvre, 24 August 1996, 5–6), thereby incurring the excommunication provided for by law (can. 1364 § 1 CIC).

2. Regarding the lay faithful, those who formally adhere to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X under the conditions established in the 1996 Explanatory Note by the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts (cf. ibid., 7), which remains in force and which is adopted by this Dicastery, are to be considered schismatics and excommunicated.

3. Finally, the holy People of God are warned that the sacred ministers of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X administer the sacraments illicitly, and that the sacrament of penance administered by them and the marriages at which they officiate are invalid.

The Church, as a caring mother, will welcome with sincere affection and deep solicitude all those who desire to return to full communion. Apostolic Nuncios will establish procedures that Ordinaries may utilize in various cases.

Finally, all the faithful are urged to remain steadfast in communion with the Roman Pontiff, with the Bishops in communion with him, and with the whole Church (cf. Lumen Gentium, 22; can. 751 CIC), and to refrain from participating in celebrations and activities promoted by the aforementioned Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X.

From the Palace of the Dicastery, 2 July 2026

Víctor M. Card. Fernández
Prefect

Msgr. Armando Matteo
Secretary for the Doctrinal Section

John J. Kennedy
Titular Archbishop of Ossero
Secretary for the Disciplinary Section

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
36 Comments

SSPX Superior Fr. Pagliarani’s homily for the 1 July 2026 consecration of bishops

Fr. Davide Pagliarani, the Superior of the SSPX, preached in French for about 37 minutes at the consecration of new bishops.  The English translation is some 2100+ words.   The English voice-over in THIS video is a bit loose.  The English translation is HERE.

HOWEVER… as I listened, Pagliarani also spoke about the Most Precious Blood of the Lord.  That part doesn’t result in the linked transcript.  I found a way to tease it out and I will include it, as is, after this precis of the released version.

I’ve been saying in conversations that the SSPX and Rome (the tight circle now around Leo) are talking past each other, as if they were speaking difference languages.  This is something that Pagliarani underscores.

A major theme is the inseparability of faith and Church.

Here is a summary for your convenience.

Pagliarani leads off saying the episcopal consecrations at Écône as a solemn, historic, and divisive event, but one whose meaning must be understood primarily as a manifestation of faith. He begins by thanking those who prepared the ceremony and those who traveled as pilgrims, then immediately frames the day’s central question: what do these consecrations mean? His answer is that they are not chiefly political, organizational, or sociological. They are an act ordered to preserving, living, and transmitting the Catholic faith as the Church has always taught it.

The speaker rejects the charge that one must choose between preserving the integral faith and remaining in the Church. He calls this a false dilemma. For Pagliarani, membership in the Church is founded above all on the integral profession of the faith of the Church. Therefore, he argues, fidelity to Tradition is not separation from the Church, but the very means of remaining within her. He insists that the Society does not seek a parallel Church, a factional identity, or a mere traditionalist sensibility. Its purpose is continuity with the faith, priesthood, Mass, sacraments, and doctrine handed down through twenty centuries.

Pagliarani also addresses accusations of disobedience or hostility toward the Pope. He insists that the Pope is loved and honored as Vicar of Christ, but argues that this love requires resisting situations in which the papal office appears, in his view, humiliated by being placed on the same level as false religions. He describes the conflict as one of language: the Society speaks “the language of faith” and Tradition, while the contemporary ecclesial establishment speaks the language of inclusion, listening, dialogue, and accompaniment. Pagliarani does not entirely reject accompaniment, but insists that it must follow the transmission of truth. The correct order, he says, is faith first, then Christian life, then accompaniment.

Pagliarani defends the consecrations as exceptional means proportionate to an exceptional need. He calls them a prudential provision for the future rather than provocation, challenge, or declaration of war. The reason for consecrating four bishops is described plainly: to secure the future, since the present bishops will not live forever and it would be irresponsible to wait until emergency conditions become irreversible. The act is therefore a foresight in service of the Church.

Pagliarani then turns to the new bishops. They are warned that they are receiving both an immense grace and a heavy cross. They are exhorted not to seek honor, power, or personal interest, but to disappear so that Christ may be known. Their office is defined in traditional episcopal terms: to preserve and transmit doctrine, sanctify souls, pray, sacrifice, and unite truth with charity. Pagliarani stresses that a bishop does not exist to manage an organization, cultivate publicity, or administer projects, but to lead souls to Heaven. At judgment, he says, what will matter is whether they preserved the faith, transmitted grace, and sanctified souls.

In addressing the faithful, Pagliarani speaks of their sacrifices, families, prayers, support for seminaries, and perseverance are praised as essential to the survival of this work. They are urged to remain simple, Catholic, humble, peaceful, and charitable. He warns them against controversy for its own sake, bitterness, resentment, and loss of hope. Even amid ecclesial crisis, he urges serenity because Christ has already conquered sin, death, and the world.

Pagliarani closes by presenting the consecrations not as an endpoint, but as a beginning. The future task is to continue forming priests, preaching, sanctifying souls, building Christian families, and handing on the faith whole and entire. His final appeal is Marian: the Blessed Virgin is invoked to preserve the Church, protect the Holy Father, strengthen the new bishops, sustain priests, and obtain perseverance in fidelity until death.

That was the sermon overall, but without the following:

On the feast of today, the feast of the Most Precious Blood, Our Lord very providentially expresses and summarizes perfectly the significance of these consecrations. He permits us to bring everything down to one point, to summarize everything in the Precious Blood of Our Lord.

He who does not know this Blood, who does not adore it and love it, does not know Our Lord and does not know the Redemption. And he who does not know Our Lord knows nothing and has understood nothing.

The Precious Blood is the unique remedy, the only remedy, the first and the last remedy for all the evils that afflict humanity. Why? Because all these evils come from sin. And the remedy for sin is the Precious Blood.

Everything evil comes from sin, and from one sin in particular. It is always the same kind of sin, from the very beginning until now: the exaltation of man. It is pride.

We are soaked in this today. This exaltation of man is everywhere: man as a wonder, man as seemingly perfect, man as seemingly possessing infinite power. In fact, all of this only pushes him toward pride. Ultimately, it pushes him toward contempt for God and toward apostasy, a silent apostasy. It comes from that.

And the more we exalt man, the more we become unbalanced, the more we become fanatics. We become far from God, and far from the true perfection of man. This is a disaster.

Man, full of all his rights, full of himself, becomes incapable of turning toward God, incapable of recognizing that he is wounded by sin. He needs redemption. He needs Our Lord. He needs His Precious Blood. That is the greatest evil of today, and of all history. It is the source of all the other evils, this disease, this excessive idea of man.

We have to recognize that. It penetrates very deeply. Unfortunately, even in the Church, this disease makes one blind. It blinds souls. It is not this that will bring souls back to God.

And so, by these consecrations, we want to do something. We want to continue to preach the Precious Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ. We want to continue, in a certain way, to spread and pour out this Blood upon souls.

It is in His Blood that Our Lord founds His Church, the new and eternal covenant, and there is only one. Whoever thinks that there are two or three covenants no longer believes in the infinite and unique power of the Blood of Our Lord.

And in speaking of the power, the value, and the dignity of the Precious Blood of Our Lord, we cannot forget where it comes from. It was formed, brought forth, and furnished by the most pure blood of Our Lady.

It was Our Lady who gave to the Word His humanity. It was in her most pure and immaculate blood that the humanity of Our Lord was formed, and that the Blood of Our Lord was formed. And it is she who offers it with Our Lord for us.

It is she who first saw the Blood flow from Our Lord’s wounds on the Cross. It is she who collects it at the foot of the Cross, who keeps it, and who still presents it at the altar. It is she who, at Mass, spreads these graces to souls.

She has understood the power and the dignity of this Blood.

What a mystery. What a mystery, this association of Our Lady with her divine Son, always at His side.

You can see how all our faith, all our religion, all our love, turns around Our Lord, because everything turns around this Blood.

Posted in SSPX |
13 Comments

A study in contrasts

Yesterday there was an episcopal consecration… in Laredo, Texas.

Today there was also an episcopal consecration in Ecône, Switzerland.

They were alike in some ways.  There were quite different in others.

You might have a look at both and consider the similarities and the differences.

Here is the video of the episcopal consecration in Ecône, Switzerland.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Here is the video of the episcopal consecration in Laredo, Texas.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

A helpful person sent me a photo of what was sung at the Communion time in Laredo. In the video this is at about 2:43:00.   Right click for larger.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
11 Comments