20 July – St. Elijah, Prophet of the Old Testament

Many of the great figures of the Old Testament are considered saints and have a day in the Roman liturgical book called the Roman Martyrology. I post about them on occasion.

The Martyrology says that when the day is clear on the regular calendar – id est there is not even an obligatory memorial – a saint of the day in the Martyrology can be selected.

Here is the entry for St. Elijah, prophet, in the Roman Martyrology.  Today is his feast:

2. Commemoratio sancti Eliae Thesbitae, qui propheta Domini in diebus Achab, regis Israel, Dei unici iura vinidicavit adversus infidelem populum tali animi robore, ut non modo Ioannem Baptistam, sed etiam Christum ipsum praefiguret; oracula scripta non reliquit, sed eius memoria fideliter servatur, praesertim in monte Carmelo.

In the older, traditional Roman calendar, I think we must use St. Jerome Emiliani.  In the newer calendar, I think we are freer, since there is only an optional memorial for St. Apollinaris.

Problem: Where to find the texts for Mass for St. Elijah?

Since the Carmelites venerate him, they have Mass texts.

Preface of Our Father, S. Elijah the Prophet: Right indeed it is and just, proper and for our welfare, that we should always and everywhere give thanks to you, holy Lord, almighty Father, eternal God; and that we should triumphantly praise, bless, and proclaim you on this solemn feast of blessed Elijah, your Prophet and our father: who, at your word, arose like fire, closed the sky, raised the dead, smote the tyrants, killed the impious, and laid the foundations of the monastic life; who, fed with bread and drink by the ministry of an angel, walked in the strength of that food as far as the holy mountain; who was carried off in a whirlwind of fire, to return as a herald of the second coming of Jesus Christ our Lord; through whom your majesty is praised by the Angels and the Archangels, by the Cherubim too and the Seraphim, who lift up their endless hymn, day by day, with one voice singing: Holy… [Not my translation.]

Here are the Mass propers.

O Carm DM St Elias Elijah propers Carmelite

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols |
Leave a comment

Would a marriage impediment apply in this case

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I was recently in a discussion with other Catholics about the following scenario, and we weren’t able to come to an agreement, or find an answer online: would it be possible for a man and a woman to validly marry each other if one or both of them were exclusively same-sex attracted, and both parties were aware of this fact? Or would this case fall under the impediment of impotence (C.I.C. can. 1084)?

“DANGER WILL ROBINSON!  DANGER!”

Questions like this are difficult.  I consulted.   I’m redrafting my findings.  I’m afraid I cannot be exhaustive.  Here are some considerations.

There is an inherent danger in trying to craft an answer for a hypothetical marriage situation. Each situation has its own complex particularities.

Impotence (can. 1084) is a specific issue with two aspects that must be considered: 1) the ability of the person to engage in the marital act in general, and 2) the ability of the person to engage in the marital act with a specific person.

Without getting too crass, Titius might be physical capable of sex, but Titius might not be capable of the sex with Sempronia. There could be physical or psychological reasons for that. Impotence, either general or specific, could possibly invalidate a marriage if it is present at the time of consent and unable to be “resolved” in a normal fashion.

I’m informed that most marriage cases in which the question of homosexuality arises, are treated under can. 1095, indeed usually can. 1095, 3, which treats an incapacity for marriage due to a grave psychological condition. Someone who is exclusively same-sex attracted might be incapable of marriage, but there are questions that need to be asked first.

On 1 October 1986, the CDF under the great Card. Ratzinger, issued a pastoral letter to the bishops on the pastoral care of homosexual persons.  It is an exceptional document. Re-reading it makes one long for the days when the dicasteries of the Holy See issued documents that provided wise pastoral guidance for those in the trenches.

In one paragraphs in the document, in section 16, we read,

“The human person, made in the image and likeness of God, can hardly be adequately described by a reductionist reference to his or her sexual orientation. Everyone living on the face of the earth has personal problems and difficulties, but challenges to growth, strengths, talents, and gifts as well. Today, the Church provides a badly needed context for the case of the human person when she refuses to consider the person solely as a ‘heterosexual’ or a ‘homosexual’ and insists that every person has a fundamental identity: the creature of God, and by grace, His child and heir to eternal life.”

This is one reason why the Church should not have specific “ministries” or liturgical celebrations for one societal category: they reduce people to one mere aspect of his person.

Among the characteristics we have there are some that are immutable. For example, I am Caucasian, I am a male, etc., in spite of what director Christopher Nolan might make of me. Then there are characteristics that are deeply ingrained in me: I am right-handed although with persistence, I could probably write with my left hand… after  fashion, not that my writing with the right hand is any good any more. Then there are shifting behavioral characteristics: I like Roman baroque music, I tend to be a night owl, I don’t like Canadian whiskey.  But tastes can change over time.

In a specific marriage case, we’d have to dig a bit to figure our where our subject’s same sex attraction falls. To some, it may seem immutable. That’s certainly what society and certain Jesuits want us to believe now. “They’re made that way!” For some, it may be simply behavioral. “It was just a phase.” For some the disordered impulse could fall in the middle category of a fairly solidly ingrained characteristic and even then there’s a range of how deeply ingrained it is.

If Titius struggles with a same-sex attraction, but wants to marry Sempronia, then some things need to be addressed at the pastoral level. First of all, is Sempronia aware of all this? Secondly, does Titius think that he would be capable of engaging in healthy and normal intimate relations with Sempronia, and not just “I’m going to grit my teeth and think of England”, but all that goes with a life of real, physical intimacy. It can’t be a matter of just suppressing his feelings, but it should be real, oblative (sacrificial) love and affection for his intended spouse.

On top of all this, we should avoid the trap our age, sloppy notions of “luv”, etc.  We are human beings, not animals.  Though there are impulses and even at certain ages hormones which push us here or there, love in marriage is an act of will, a choice especially to help your spouse get to Heaven.   The good of the other must be up front.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
Leave a comment

Daily Rome Shot 1663 – Happy International Chess Day!

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.   I ask your prayers as well.

 

Here’s one small step for the Jesuits, one giant leap for the Church.

At Infovaticana we read that in Spain, the Jesuits are closing FIVE closures in three months due to the lack of vocations. The closure at Murcia ends almost 500 years of Jesuit presence. The first Jesuits arrived in Murcia in 1555, barely fifteen years after the founding of the Society of Jesus by St. Ignatius of Loyola and still during the lifetime of its founder.

QUAERITUR: Didn’t we just read that the Jesuits in these USA are reducing the number of their novitiates?

Meanwhile in Kanasas…

For most places, we aren’t in Kansas anymore, are we.

What is black’s way to procede?

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

ASK FATHER: public veneration of relics

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Dear Fr Zuhlsdorf,

I find myself again researching a matter that does not appear to be covered in the usual sources: the public veneration of relics.

As far as I am aware, there is no ‘rite’ for this per se (certainly not in the Rituale) but that for centuries it has been regulated by local custom.

I would be much obliged if you could point me in the direction of printed sources (or otherwise documented Roman customs) in relation to the public veneration of relics. In addition or alternatively, your views on rubricians for me to contact would be gratefully received.

There is a 2017 Instruction from the Congregation for the Causes of Saints called “Relics in the Church: Authenticity and Preservation”.

In short…

In the Latin Church, there is no single obligatory rite of exposition and veneration of relics comparable to the rite for exposition and Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament.

There are, however, several binding requirements and liturgical norms.

  • The relic must be authentic. The Instruction states that relics of Blesseds and Saints may not be exposed for the veneration of the faithful without a certificate from competent ecclesiastical authority guaranteeing their authenticity.
  • Public cult is permitted only for Saints and Blesseds. Canon 1187 provides: “It is permitted to reverence through public veneration only those servants of God whom the authority of the Church has recorded in the list of the saints or the blessed.” Thus, the bodily remains or personal effects of a Servant of God or Venerable may be preserved, but they may not be presented as relics for public ecclesiastical veneration before beatification.
  • The relic must be displayed in a dignified place. It may be placed in a reliquary on a pedestal, table, shrine, or other suitably decorated place. It must not be placed upon the mensa of the altar, which is reserved for the Eucharistic Sacrifice and the Body and Blood of Christ.
  • No particular gesture by the faithful is mandatory. The Directory explicitly recognizes such practices as kissing the reliquary, decorating it with lights and flowers, carrying it in procession, and taking it to the sick or dying. These actions must be conducted with dignity. A person may therefore pray before the relic, bow, make the Sign of the Cross, or kiss the reliquary. A genuflection ordinarily signifies adoration and should not be made to a saint’s relic as though it were the Blessed Sacrament.
  • Incense is regulated when used at Mass. Incense is optional for relics. When a relic of a saint is exposed for public veneration during Mass, it is incensed – as per the Instruction – with two swings of the thurible, at the beginning of the celebration after the altar has been incensed. A relic of the Holy Cross receives three swings.

Consequently, a simple public veneration might consist of the authenticated relic being placed on a dignified stand with candles, perhaps with a reading and prayer invoking the saint’s intercession, perhaps a hymn or litany, and an opportunity for the faithful to approach and kiss the reliquary. It is possible that local dioceses have some legislation.

As a bonus, since today in the Vetus Ordo calendar is the Feast of St. Vincent de Paul, here is a 1st class relic of the saint which I am fortunate to have.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
1 Comment

Daily Rome Shot 1662

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

Not trying to photo bomb…

White to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Your Sunday Sermon Notes – 8th Sunday after Pentecost (N.O.: 16th Ordinary) 2026

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for this 8th Sunday after Pentecost in the Vetus Ordo (16th Ordinary Sunday in the Novus Ordo)?

Tell us about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.  I know there has been upheaval.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

A taste of what I offered at 1 Peter 5 this week.  I wrote about the 2nd Sunday after Pentecost but related it to the great feasts nearby.

[…]

The Mass of the 8th Sunday after Pentecost sets before us the household of God and the household of this world, the inheritance promised to sons and the account demanded of stewards, the freedom of those led by the Spirit and the anxious calculations of those who live according to the flesh. The Collect, Epistle, and Gospel converge upon a single demand: we must become in conduct what grace has made us in being. Baptism has transferred us from the dominion of sin into the familia of God, yet the adopted child must live according to the Father, and the steward must use the goods of his Lord with the eternal reckoning always before his eyes.

[…]

 

Posted in Sermons | Tagged
Leave a comment

ASK FATHER: Cut off from my beloved SSPX chapel, suffering.

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I recently read your “In Illo Tempore: 8th Sunday after Pentecost” commentary on One Peter Five. I ask your opinion on this, given your remarks on suffering. What would you say to someone who is suffering, due to having gone to an SSPX chapel for years, who has come to fall in love with that community since the issuing TC by Pope Francis, and now feels cut off due to the recent excommunications levied against laity, where out of humility, he feels that he can’t simply write off the excommunications as invalid. As someone who feels they found a solid, stable community with the Society, and now feel unjustly commanded by Rome to cut myself off from them, being forced back into the Diocesan structure again, I’m feeling much suffering, confusion and bitter zeal. Any words of advice would be helpful. Thank you and God Bless.

You are not alone.

I am still grappling with the fact that the Holy See and some bishops – with the sloppy documents they put out – have gone out of their way to scare people, to make them feel like outsiders or transgressors. This is an epoch when everyone is supposed to be hyper-pastoral, to listen, to accompany as people discern. According to a footnote, adulterers can receive Communion after “discerning”, but if you “discern” that you want to attend a TLM at an SSPX chapel you are … what? It’s not even clear “what” you are, so poorly drafted are these declarations and explanations.

However badly done it was, the “Explanatory Note”, which has no juridical force, did reference a previous document which made some distinctions about lay people who frequent chapels of the SSPX. The 1996 Explanatory Note describes people who attend SSPX chapels without having a “schismatic spirit”. In that case a person does not incur any censure.

In what you wrote, I do not pick up any sense of defiance of Rome or the local bishop. In fact, you seem concerned to respect their authority. Also, you state that you have developed a strong bond with the community of a chapel. That does not sound like a “schismatic spirit” to me. However, that is something only you can determine.

I note that you mentioned that you have gone to the SSPX chapel “since the issuing of TC”. It seems that you simply want to have the Church’s traditional sacred liturgy. That’s your primary motive.  You did not write, “I go there in defiance of the Pope and the local bishop and no one can stop me!”

When laws place restrictions on people the Church wants us to interpret the laws as strictly as possible so that there isn’t “restriction creep”. Laws are not supposed to be cruel. Even though, as I understand, the 2026 Explanatory Note doesn’t have any juridical effect, in the spirit of that principle of interpretation of law – that is odiosa restringenda – it seems to me that your participation at an SSPX chapel especially because of the social bonds you now have, will not result in a censure, either automatic or declared.

So much suffering and anxiety has been inflicted on so many people because of ideology driven despotism. Let us ask Our Blessed Mother to intervene with the High Priest and bring this mess to an end.

Remember, O most gracious Virgin Mary, that never was it known that anyone who fled to thy protection, implored thy help, or sought thine intercession was left unaided. Inspired by this confidence, I fly unto thee, O Virgin of virgins, my mother; to thee do I come, before thee I stand, sinful and sorrowful. O Mother of the Word Incarnate, despise not my petitions, but in thy mercy hear and answer me.

Amen.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, SSPX, The future and our choices | Tagged
5 Comments

A Cardinal accidently gets it right!

My good friend Fr. Murray was on with Raymond Arroyo and Robert Royal and one of their topics was an odd thing the Windy Cardinal said about synoldaling (“walking together”).  He compared synoldaling to an ethnic Croatian folk dance.

Little did he realize….  with some emphases.


ARROYO: Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago wrote in L’Osservatore Romano, the Vatican’s official newspaper, this week that synodality is the Church learning to dance. He compared it to Croatian folk dances in his childhood parish hall. Father, is that actually a description of governance, or is it a way of taking authority, if you will, from the Church without having to define who is leading?

MURRAY: I thought it was a very unfortunate analogy that the cardinal used, because he is basically saying that the relationship in the Church now is like a dance, and the dance involves people moving and all the rest.

But a Croatian folk dance is staged. In other words, the steps are all predetermined. Nobody acts independently. If you act independently, you mess up the dance. By implication, then, synodality means that we can all dance together, but we all have to know already what the steps are. If we step out of line, there is a problem.

I do not think he intended it that way, but that is exactly what synodality has become. As you saw in the synodal process used at the last consistory of cardinals, they were given a checklist of topics they could discuss and restricted time in which to speak. Then, of course, the table discussions were filtered through what the moderator of each table wanted.

That is basically like a dance: you do steps A, B, C, D, and E, and then we all clap at the end.

Why are they using analogies? Because synodality has no definition. We all know what a hammer is. We do not describe a hammer as something like a wrench, but not quite. We know what things are, and we have definitions when they are objects that we can identify.

Synodality cannot be identified, and they are using that to their benefit. Any innovation they introduce, such as putting laypeople in the Synod of Bishops, is now simply called synodality.

ARROYO: That metaphor may be apt, though, Father. It is choreographed within an inch of its life. Everybody claps at the end, and you have to do the two-step many times in between.


It’s on YouTube HERE

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
6 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1661

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

Heh…

Fascinating…

White to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

WDTPRS – 16th (Novus Ordo) Sunday in Ordinary Time: Wherein Fr. Z rants.

We have been cheated of the beauty of our Catholic worship in Latin, which is our common patrimony.

In fact, the swindle is far deeper.  People have been denied the opportunity to learn Latin, which pretty much every more or less schooled person had as something so fundamental that it wasn’t even questioned.

At a certain point, those who wanted to subvert the Church (and society with it) had enough power to strike.  They knew that Latin, which helped people learn how to think if nothing else, had to go.  It has now been a long time since Latin was commonplace in schooling.  After such a gap of time, it will be difficult for many to grasp these tightly woven ancient Latin Collects with their lovely rhythms, their clarity of thought, their force.  After many centuries they still communicate the profound intellectual formation and the faith of their composers, our Christian family ancestors.

Alas, the treasury doors were slammed in people faces.  And ears!   By getting rid of Latin, they got rid of the sacred music!  And since there was nothing written in the vernacular, they quickly glommed onto the lowest possible denominator of music – popular ditties, poorly played and without substance.

The erosion began and still goes on.

We have arrived at a point where hardly any of our bishops can pronounce Latin much less read it.  What does that mean for our identity as Roman Catholics of the Latin Church?  (Yes, I know that not all of you are Romans.) This may be one of the reasons why certain bishops are so hostile to Mass being celebrated in the Church’s official language of prayer: they don’t know Latin themselves and, therefore, they suppress it contra legem (that’s Latin, btw).

I digress.

The Collect for the 16th Ordinary Sunday, Novus Ordo, is not in any pre-Conciliar Missale Romanum.  It has its antecedent in a 9th century manuscript.  Enjoy the fine clausula (rhythmic ending).

Propitiare, Domine, famulis tuis, et clementer gratiae tuae super eos dona multiplica, ut, spe, fide et caritate ferventes, semper in mandatis tuis vigili custodia perseverent.

I like that cusTOdia perseVErent.  If memory serves, I think that’s called cursus velox.  It’s been a long time.

Famulus and feminine famula appear frequently in our Mass orations.  Famulus is probably from Latin’s ancient cousin, the Oscan faama, “house.”   A Latin famulus or famula was a household servant or hand-maid, slave or free. They were considered members of the larger family under the paterfamilias.

Custodia is “a watching, guard, care, protection” and has the military overtone of “guard, sentinel”.  Vigil is “wakeful, watchful”, and, like custodia, can also be “a watchman, sentinel”.  Liturgically, a “vigil” is the evening and night before a great feast day.  In ancient times vigils were times of fasting and penance.  Men who were to be knighted kept a night’s vigil. They were watchful against the attacks of the world, the flesh and the Devil.  They fasted, prayed, and examined their consciences in order to be pure for the rites to follow.  In the ancient Roman churches there were great vigils before ordinations when the whole people would wake during the night for prayers and readings.

LITERAL VERSION:

Look propitiously on Your servants, O Lord, and indulgently multiply upon them the gifts of Your grace so that, burning with faith, hope and charity, they may with vigilant watchfulness persevere always in your commands.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

Lord, be merciful to your people. Fill us with your gifts and make us always eager to serve you in faith, hope, and love.

Notice any concept missing?

It’s like they were trying to make entire generations quit going to church.

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

Show favor, O Lord, to your servants and mercifully increase the gifts of your grace, that, made fervent in hope, faith and charity, they may be ever watchful in keeping your commands.

Scripture often gives us images of watches during the night.  At the birth of the Lord shepherds “were keeping watch over their flock by night (vigilantes et custodientes vigilias noctis)” (Luke 2:8).  Jesus said, “Watch (vigilate) therefore, for you do not know on what day your Lord is coming. But know this, that if the householder had known in what part of the night the thief was coming, he would have watched (vigilaret) and would not have let his house be broken into. Therefore you also must be ready; for the Son of man is coming at an hour you do not expect” (Matthew 24:42-44).   Our Lord explains that servants should keep watch in order to open the door for the master of the house even if he returns in the dead of the night (cf Luke 12:37-39).

St Paul constantly urges Christians to be “watchful”.  In 1 Peter 5:8 we read sobering, “Be sober, be watchful. Your adversary the Devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour”.

The Enemy is seeking you!

In the ancient Roman countryside there were great estates (latifundia) having many buildings for family, household servants, the various workers, storage, etc.  These dwellings were often self-sufficient, and were surrounded with walls against attacks by brigands.  Even into Renaissance times, a great house in a city (domus) might be fortified with watch towers.  The householder or the lord of the estate was the head or father of the larger “family”.  Kind or cruel, the paterfamilias was judge, protector and provider to everyone under his care.

Simple ancient famuli had to work to produce good fruits in order to survive with a good quality of life and a safe place to belong.  We sophisticated modern famuli, marked with the family name “Christian”, marked permanently with the family seal through baptism and confirmation, must produce fruits according to our vocations.

When life’s reckoning comes, will we be like the foolish virgins? They watched all night for the arrival of the Bridegroom, but they didn’t have enough oil for their lamps.  They were locked out of the house in the dangerous night with no place to go, no work to do, no purpose to fulfill. They no longer belonged.  They were… out.

Vigilate… Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour” (Matthew 25:13).

When you hear the priest pronounce this Collect, beg our Lord – so gracious and patient with us even when we are lazy and sinful – to continue to give us the gifts of faith, hope and charity that we need for salvation.

Posted in WDTPRS |
8 Comments