
In the 2005 Roman Martyrology for Vigil of Christmas has a fascinating entry. Here is the first entry of Christmas Eve day:
1. Commemoratio omnium sanctorum avorum Iesu Christi, filii David, filii Abraham, filii Adam, patrum scilicet, qui Deo placuerunt et iusti inventi sunt et iuxta fidem defuncti, nullis acceptis promissionibus, sed longe eas aspicientes et salutantes, ex quibus natus est Christus secundum carnem, qui est super omnia Deus benedictus in saecula.
The commemoration of all the holy forefathers of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham, the son of Adam, namely of the fathers, who pleased God and were both found to be righteous and also died in the faith, having received none of the promises fulfilled, but regarding them and greeting them from afar, from which the Christ was born according to the flesh, who is blessed God above all things forever.
Keep in mind that the Gospel reading for the Vigil Mass is the genealogy of the Lord from the Gospel of Matthew.
In that Gospel genealogy, Christ is shown to by the Lord of the history of our salvation.
And Matthew takes pains to teach us subtle things.
Take note of the four women he mentions. He does not mention the great women we usually think of in the Old Testament, such as Sarah, Rebecca, Leah and Rachel. Instead we get Tamar, Rahab, Ruth and the woman who had been “the wife of Uriah”
So, we see pagans in the genealogy who are women of less than perfect background in the eyes of the ancient Jews.
First, women were not typically included in ancient Jewish genealogies, so their presence signals intention. These women show that the Messiah’s lineage unfolds through unexpected persons and irregular circumstances, foreshadowing Mary’s own situation and underscoring God’s gracious initiative in surprising contexts. Each woman’s story carries social stigma or moral complexity, yet they still become part of salvation history. Tamar was denied justice by Judah’s family, so she disguised herself as a prostitute to secure the promised lineage, risking shame and scandal. Rahab was a Canaanite prostitute in Jericho, Rahab sheltered Israelite spies, betraying her city. Moreover, Tamar, Rahab, and Ruth was a Moabite considered enemies of God. Her bold nighttime approach to Boaz risked misunderstanding, yet her fidelity transformed a socially suspect union into a crucial link in the messianic line. Bathsheba is overshadowed by David’s sins. All four are linked to Gentile origins, including Bathsheba to Uriah the Hittite, prefiguring Matthew’s universal vision of the Gospel extending beyond Israel to the nations.
God choses those whom it pleases Him to choose.























Happy Christmas Father,
Here is a rendition of the piece “Which was a Son of…” by Arvo Arvo Part, who takes to another level a what is for many a boring passage of the Gospel:
https://youtu.be/WyPmFBpiF7E?si=5FKZhZd3CM1VFnx8
this was central to Father’s homily this evening. he bookended it with saying that a dreamer sees things as he wishes them to be, while someone awake sees things as they are. a dreamer would posit an idealized genealogy, but we see flawed people and the messes they make. the Lord writes straight with crooked lines.
I’ve long held that the historical veracity of the texts of the Old and New Testaments is secured by their blunt candour: they relate many things people would like to forget or pretend didn’t happen. The only possible explanation for the text we have (outside of the obvious Divine Providence) is the absolute sincerity of its transmitters (the Catholic Church): it would have made a lot more sense to make some “critical amendments,” like the early heretical sects attempted (or Luther…), but we have a remarkably consistent textual transmission legacy.