Daily Rome Shot 1098

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – UK HERE  WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

White to move and mate in…?

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Nice people! Great service!

Buy great beer. Help the monks.

In chessy news, my guy Wesley So won yesterday against the tough Nodirbek to move up in the standings in St. Louis at the Rapid and Blitz. Nepo and “Puer” are tied in 1st with lots on their heels except poor Pragg who is struggling.

Ding and Gukesh will square off for the Big Title on an island off of Singapore at a resort. There will be an open during the match. 20 Nov- 15 Dec.

Meanwhile, yesterday I mentioned that I could take some Mass intentions. I have received some requests. I am careful in how they are addressed. Whenever you address a priest for Mass intentions, keep in mind a few things. First, if he is in a parish, most of the time he has to take the intention from the parish. He will have some days off when he can take intentions, but don’t automatically assume that he can. Ask and find out IF he can, BEFORE sending him a stipend. When a priest accepts a stipend for an intention, it is like a binding contract. He is obliged morally and by law to celebrate the intention or find someone else who can if he is impeded. I don’t take large numbers of intentions at a time because, frankly, were I to keel over, I don’t know who would straighten them out for me right now. That’s the fruit of being semi-cancelled. Also, I like to be able to take intentions that are pressing, if I can. Some of the intentions I have recently received are quite moving. Friends, please pray for an increase in vocations and foster them when you can. We need more good priests. The shortage makes it hard for people to have Masses said. That’s just one more – one more important – problem in the modern Church of the Glorious Springtime. Anyway, requests  HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on Daily Rome Shot 1098

VIDEO: 1950 – Pius XII infallible proclamation of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary

In 1950 my late pastor, Msgr. Schuler, was in Rome on a Fulbright working on the manuscripts of Giovanni Maria Nanino, the successor of Palestrina for the Sistine Chapel.  He had great stories about being a priest in Rome in that Holy Year and, specifically, of the Proclamation of the Dogma of the Assumption.

It was a different world.  Think about it: the war had ended just 5 years before.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

There is moment when a woman is holding up a mirror so she can see over the crowd.  For a moment I thought, “Is that a… time traveller caught on film?!?”

Posted in Just Too Cool, Linking Back, Our Solitary Boast | Tagged
4 Comments

4th Glorious Mystery: The Assumption – Patristic Rosary Project

Some years ago, I made something called the Patristic Rosary Project, reflecting on the mysteries of the Holy Rosary especially with quotes from the Fathers of the Church.  Here is the entry for today’s beautiful feast:

4th Glorious Mystery: The Assumption

Although Ven. Pius XII refers carefully to Mary having completed the course of her life, rather than explicitly to her death in the document whereby he declared infallibly the dogma of the Assumption, and St. John Paul II adverts to the end of Mary’s life in a General Audience in 1997 – as do other saintly writers – we do not have from the Church a definitive or infallible teaching beyond a shadow of a doubt whether Mary died and then was assumed body and soul into heaven at that moment or if she was assumed without dying.  That said, it was certainly fitting that, if her Divine Son tasted death, then she would as well.  On the other hand, it is possible that in some manner like to perhaps what unfallen man might have been able to do, Mary’s love for God could no longer be contained and went to God by loving choice rather than experiencing the punishment of the Original Sin she did not have.

Even in the Eastern tradition, which speaks of the Dormition, the Sleeping, of Mary we have a sub-current of death.  Sleep is certainly a euphemism for death and they are closely related. Greek ???????? gives us ??????????? or Latin coemeterium, whence English “cemetery”, which is a “sleeping place”. Traditions are divided about her last earthly breaths. Some authors hold that she did not die before her Assumption. There is also a strong tradition that she was buried.  That said, no one really knows where, though the cult of the burial places of the holy has always been strong, even in the days before Christ.

Perhaps a good explanation is that Our Blessed Mother, desiring to be like her Son, who did die, chose herself to die though Satan had no hold on her.  It was fitting that she, the daughter of her Son and disciple of Her Lord, should be as He was.  So, after a brief interval during which no corruption touched her, her soul and body were reunited in heaven in the presence of God.

In any event, we know with our Catholic faith, and by infallible authority, that at the end of her earthly life, the Mother of God was assumed into heaven and no stain of the corruption of the grave touched her.

Our humanity is seated at the right hand of the Father in the divine Person of our Lord, but now also in the human person of our Lady.

Christ is consubstantial with the Father. Christ is consubstantial with His Mother.

Mary is Mother of a divine Person with two natures. She is not Mother of part of Christ, but Mother of all of Christ in His integrity. And so, we can call her Mother of God and Mother of the Church. Her heavenly Assumption was fitting.

There are not elaborate reflections in the writings of the Fathers on the Assumption, because it was not a main point of reflection. Still, we can find their thoughts on some passages of Scripture which help us to understand Mary’s role in the plan of our salvation.

As a perfect model for our own Christian discipleship, we can consider, among many texts, Proverbs 8:

And now, my sons, listen to me: happy are those who keep my ways. Hear instruction and be wise, and do not neglect it. Happy is the man who listens to me, watching daily at my gates, waiting beside my doors. For he who finds me finds life and obtains favor from the LORD; but he who misses me injures himself; all who hate me love death.

While this concerns Wisdom, in a sense it harks to Mary, Wisdom’s seat. Here is the reflection of Athenagoras on this section of Proverbs:

[The Son] is the first offspring of the Father, I do not mean that He was created, for, since God is eternal mind, He had His Word within Himself from the beginning, being eternally wise. Rather did the Son come forth from God to give form and actuality to all material things, which essentially have a sort of formless nature and inert quality, the heavier particles being mixed up with the lighter. The prophetic Spirit agrees with this opinion when He says, “The Lord created me as the first of His ways, for His works.” Indeed we say that the Holy Spirit Himself, who inspires those who utter prophecies, is an effluence from God, flowing from Him, and returning like ray of the sun. Who, then, would not be astonished to hear those called atheists who admit God the Father, God the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and who teach their unity of power and their distinction in rank? … We affirm, too, a crowd of angels and ministers, whom God, the maker and creator of the world, appointed to their several tasks through His Word, He gave them charge over the good order of the universe, over the elements, the heavens, the world, and all it contains. [A plea regarding Christians 10]

This fellow sounds a bit like a subordinationist, but he is fascinating. This passage is interesting also for its hints at the cosmology and physics of late antiquity. Also, it aims at the spiritual hierarchy in which our wondrous Lady has a privileged place.

Consider that the reward of assumption into the beatific vision stems as well from her perfect act of free will when she gave her “Fiat” to God’s will as expressed by the angel. Here is St. Augustine speaking of the impact of free will:

Man in paradise was capable of self-destruction by abandoning justice by an act of will; yet if the life of justice was to be maintained, his will alone would not have sufficed, unless He who made Him glad had given him aid. But, after the fall, God’s mercy was even more abundant, for then the will itself had to be freed from the bondage in which sin and death are the masters. There is no way at all by which it can be freed by itself, but only though God’s grace, which is made effectual in the faith of Christ. Thus, as it is written, even the will by which “the will itself is prepared by the Lord” so that we may receive the other gifts of God through which we come to the Gift eternal – this too comes from God. [Enchiridion 28.106]

God’s grace and Mary’s “Fiat” which was by grace. Mary was drawn with love into God’s plan and, later, into God’s presence. The Fathers made frequent use of the Song of Songs. St. Gregory the Great writes about the exchanges of heaven and earth which marked the plan of salvation:

The Church speaks through Solomon: “See how he comes leaping on the mountains, bounding over the hill!” … By coming for our redemption the Lord leaped! My friends, do you want to become acquainted with these leaps of His? From heaven He came to the womb, from the womb to the manger, from the manger to the Cross, from the Cross to the sepulcher, and from the sepulcher He returned to heaven. You see how Truth, having made Himself known in the flesh, leaped for us to make us run after Him. [Forty Gospel Homilies 29]

Our Lady, who would feel Christ leap beneath her heart, herself leapt after Christ in her heart by her “Fiat”. She leapt to begin His public ministry when she said at Cana “Do whatever He tell you.” She leapt up Calvary with Him when the Blood and water flowed down. Her motherly and Christian heart leapt in joy in seeing Him gloriously risen. She leapt to Him in heaven when her earthly life was concluded.

In heaven Mary shines with the glory God shares with her. In the book of Revelation we have a description chapter 12 of the woman clothed with the sun. The Fathers speak about this image. They will mostly consider the woman as an image of the Church. We cannot reduce the Church to Mary. Nor in talking of the Church as Christ’s Body reduce Christ to the Church. But the three, Christ, Mary and Church are intimately associated. Hippolytus (+245) writes:

By the “woman clothed with the sun”, he meant most manifestly the Church, endued with the Father’s Word, whose brightness is above the sun. And by “the moon under her feet,” he referred to [the Church] being adorned, like the moon, with heavenly glory. And the words “upon her head a crowd of twelve stars” refer to the twelve apostles by whom the Church was founded.

Of course Christ founded the Church on the Apostles, and chiefly upon the Rock who is Peter. The description of the woman, however, fits Mary the Mother of the Church as well as the Church herself. Here is an extended piece by someone not too many in the West may read, Oecumenius (6th c.) called the “Rhetor” who wrote the earliest Greek commentary on Revelation:

The vision intends to describe more completely to us the circumstances concerning the antichrist…. However, since the incarnation of the Lord, which made the world his possession and subjected it, provided a pretext for Satan to raise this one up and to choose him [as his instrument] – for the antichrist will be raised to cause the world again to fall from Christ and to persuade it to desert to Satan – and since moreover His fleshly conception and birth was the beginning of the incarnation of the Lord, the vision gives a certain order and sequence to the material that it is going to discuss and begins the discussion from the fleshly conception of the Lord by portraying for us the mother of God. What does he say? “And a sign appeared in heaven, a woman clothed with the sum and the moon was under her feet.” As we said, it is peaking about the mother of our Savior. The vision appropriately depicts her as in heaven and not on the earth, for she is pure in soul and body, equal to an angel and a citizen of heaven. She possesses God who rests in heaven – “for heaven is my throne” – it says yet she is flesh, although she has nothing in common with the earth nor is there any evil in her. Rather, she is exalted, wholly worthy of heaven, even though she possesses our human nature and substance. For the Virgin is consubstantial with us. Let the impious teaching of Eutyches, which make the fanciful claim that the Virgin is of another substance than we, be excluded from the belief of the holy courts together with his other opinions. And what does it mean that she was clothed with the sun and the moon was under her feet? The holy prophet Habakkuk, prophesied concerning the Lord, saying, “The sun was lifted up, and the moon stood still in its place for light.” calling Christ our Savior, or at least the proclamation of the gospel, the “sun of righteousness”. When He was exalted and increased, the moon – that is, the law of Moses – “stood still” and no longer received any addition. For after the appearance of Christ, it no longer received proselytes from the nations as before but endured diminution and cessation. You will, therefore, observe this with me, that also the holy Virgin is covered by the spiritual sun. For this is what the prophet calls the Lord when concerning Israel he says, “Fire fell upon them, and they did not see the sun.” But the moon, that is, the worship and citizenship according to the law, being subdued and become much less than itself, is under her feet, for it has been conquered by the brightness of the gospel. And rightly does he call the things of the law by the word “moon”, for they have been given light by the sun, that is, Christ just as the physical moon is given its light by the physical sun. The point would have been better made had it said not that the woman was clothed with the sun but that the woman enclothed the sun, which was enclosed in her womb. However, that the vision might show that the Lord, who was being carried in the womb, was the shelter of His own mother and the whole creation, it says that He was enclothing the woman. Indeed, the holy angel said something similar to the holy Virgin: “The Spirit of the Lord will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you.” For to overshadow is to protect, and to enclothe is the same according to power. [Commentary on the Apocalypse 12.1-2]

Take careful note of the image drawn on by the interesting Oecumenius, which also speaks to the cosmology of late antiquity. First, Oecumenius either knew that the sun gave light to the moon, as it does, or he extrapolates this from the glory that Christ gives to Mary.

All our Marian feasts, all our reflection, to keep the sunlight and moon theme going, always must draw us back to the Person of the Lord. We reflect on the face of the Lord who is reflected in the face of His Mother.

Our recitation of the Rosary brings us to know the Lord more and more and, in turn, know ourselves better.

We reflect His image and likeness and He came into the word to reveal us more fully to ourselves.

Posted in Our Solitary Boast, Patristiblogging, Patristic Rosary Project | Tagged
1 Comment

ASK FATHER: Is Baptism valid if one person says the words and another person pours the water?

From a priest friend (summarized):

QUAERITUR:

At Gloria.TV there is a story about aberrations in Germany [Imagine my shock!]. One was a Baptism problem: the priest said the words while the godfather poured the water. Is this a valid Baptism?

No.

The matter (water) must be administered by the one and the same minister at the same time as the words (proper Trinitarian form) of Baptism is pronounced.

St. Thomas Aquinas wrote (Summa Theologiae, III p., q. 67, a. 6 to 3):

[I]t must be stated that the integrity of baptism consists in the form of the words and the use of the matter. Consequently, he who only pronounces the words does not baptize, nor he who immerses. Wherefore if one pronounces the words and the other immerses, no form of the words can be fitting.”

In the Roman Ritual (Tit. 2, cap. 1, n. 10) we read:

[I]dem sit aquam adhibens et verba pronuntians…. [L]et the same man be the one applying the water and pronouncing the words.

The question was laid before the Sacred Congregation for Discipline of the Sacraments in 1916 (AAS 08 (1916), p. 478):

Doctrina catholica certissime tenet ab uno eodemque ministro poni debere materiam simulque formam baptismatis proferri … Catholic doctrine most certainly holds that the matter ought to be placed by one and the same minister at the same time as the form of the baptism is offered.

Since we are unreconstructed ossified manualists, we also include the issue of how the water is administered (whether by pouring, sprinkling or immersing): Does it have to be three times, corresponding to the names of the Trinity in the form?

No.  Once is sufficient for validity, so long as it flows (moves) on the head of the one being baptized.  However, the obligation of a threefold pouring (etc.) is grave, as is, in the tradition of the Church, to use Baptismal Water or at the very least Holy Water.  In necessity, regular water can be used.

Heribert Jone says in his Moral Theology (trans. Adelman – 1962).  This also addresses the question of two people dividing the action of pouring and speaking:

467. — 3. The proximate valid matter of Baptism consists in the actual washing of the person to be baptized by the one baptizing.

The washing may be done by immersion, aspersion or infusion.

A definite quantity of water is not required; it suffices Lat the water flow over the one being baptized. Several authors hold the flowing of one or two drops insufficient. — Baptism is doubtful and must be repeated conditionally if administered by rubbing wet fingers across the forehead or by merely making the sign of the cross thereon with a wet finger. The same holds for the use of a damp cloth, sponge or wet hand when the water does not actually flow. Likewise, if administered by aspersion as when sprinkling with holy water if the drops do not flow over the skin but remain when they fall.

The water must touch the one to be baptized. Baptism is invalid if the water merely comes in contact with the clothes, or the uterus or fetal membrane in case of uterine Baptism. It is likewise invalid if only a head scab or a mucuous excretion on the head is contacted. — If the hair alone and not the skin is touched the baptism is doubtful.

Baptism is certainly valid if administered on the head (if the hair is very thick it would be better to baptize on the forehead). Baptism is valid even if the head is entirely covered with sores. It is probably valid if one were to baptize on the breast, neck or shoulder; probably invalid if administered on the hand, arm or the foot.

Validity also requires that one and the same person apply the water and pronounce the words. The washing may be done by infusion or by holding the one to be baptized in standing or flowing water (e.g., in a spring or in the rain).

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
5 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1097

NB: I can take some Mass intentions right now.  HERE

Welcome registrant:

Gift

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – UK HERE  WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

In chessy news, in the 2024 Saint Louis Rapid & Blitz after two days MVL, Nepo and “Puer” are in a three-way tie. Of the other seven players, only Fabi won his game against Pragg. Today my guy Wesley So is up against Hikaru Nakamura.

White to move and mate in 4.


1. Qh6 Rxg3 2. Bg6 Rxg6 3. fxg6 fxg6 4. Qxf8#
NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Interested in learning?  Try THIS.

And …

Hey Fathers!  How about a clerical Guayabera shirt for the hot summer days? (They have regular ones, too.)  I had an email from them that they have refreshed their inventory and also have clerical polos.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1096

With this photo, I’ve posted about 3 years of these.

Photo from The Great Roman™

Nice people! Great service!

Welcome registrant:

1loghome

Interim, motus ad lusorem cum militibus albis pertinet. Scaccus mattus, scilicet nex regis, quattuor in motis veniat.


1. Nf5 Rf7 2. Rg4 Rg7 3. fxg7+ Qxg7 4. Qxg7#
NB: Detineam explicationes in crastinum, ne vestrae interrumpantur commentationes.

Interested in learning?  Try THIS.

Many thank to those of you who were using Continue To Give who have switched to Zelle.  Also, super thanks to ES who sent things from my wishlist and brightened up yesterday, which was a travel nightmare.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – UK HERE  WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

Meanwhile, some one saw the license plate frame with this and, after a puzzled look, had a good laugh.

3:16 isn’t just in John.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on Daily Rome Shot 1096

14 August – St. Maximilian Kolbe : priest, martyr, ham. Also, the 3rd path to beatification: “Oblatio Vitae”

Maximilian KolbeToday, 14 August, is the Vigil of the Assumption (purple).  It is also the Feast of St. Maximilian Kolbe (red), a Franciscan priest put to death at Auschwitz.

St. Maximilian Kolbe, has a special relevance for Catholic media.

Today, dear readers, say a prayer to him, asking his intercession with God for the conversion of catholics who use the media to confuse the faithful and to distort the teachings of the Church.  Pray especially for the conversion of the staff of the National Schismatic Reporter (aka Fishwrap), RU-486 (aka The Tablet), Jesuit-run Amerika, as well as several individuals who prate with tweets that distort the Faith or some aspect of the faith or morals.

Remember the prayer to St. Joseph for the Conversion of the National catholic Reporter which I posted HERE.

These catholic” outlets must be converted or, like the priests of Baal, they must fail and fail spectacularly.

Also, please ask St. Maximilian to intercede, asking God to keep those who are dedicated to making Christ and His Church known and loved in their fullness faithful, charitable and courageous.

My 1st Class relic of St. Maximillian Kolbe

St. Maximillian was beatified by Paul IV in 1971 as a confessor (he lived a life of heroic virtue) and canonized by John Paul II in 1982 as a martyr (killed because of the Faith).

The two categories are not exclusive.  As a matter of fact, in the moment of martyrdom, the virtues are perfected in a person.

However, the use of two categories does raise a question.  Which was it?  Heroic virtue?  Martyrdom? In fact, he probably wasn’t killed by the Nazis because of the Faith, or his priesthood: he offered to take the place of another prisoner.  His choice led to his death.  He offered his life, though it may not have been martyrdom, in the strict sense.

(His choice led to his death.  I’m reminded of the situation in Chicago with Cupich and the Institute.  He forced them into a corner where they had to sign something that they couldn’t possible sign without betraying their identity and the people they serve.  Then when he took away their ability to say Mass publicly his spox said “It was their choice!”   Right.. just like it was St. Thomas More’s choice… St. John Fisher’s choice….  I digress.)

There is, in the paths to beatification, both the way of heroic virtue and martyrdom, but also now, since fairly recent, what is called oblatio vitae.

I am not one for innovations, but this seems good to me.

The criteria for oblatio vitae include:

a) the free and willing offering of life and heroic acceptance propter caritatem of certain death and in a brief time limit;

b) the exercise, at least in an ordinary degree, of the Christian virtues before the offering of life and, thereafter, until death.

Again, this path describes a person who has during life, been living a virtuous life, but in at least an ordinary rather than extraordinary and heroic way. Out of true charity (properly understood as sacrificial love of God and neighbor exemplifying Christ’s own sacrificial love) he performs some act which results in death in a short period of time and because of the act performed.

Hence, St. Maximilian, living of life of virtue (he was beatified under that rubric), by his offering (not necessary because the Nazi’s chose him because he was a Catholic priest) died as a result.

Hence, Ven. Vince Capodanno, who lived a virtuous life, was killed when trying to help a wounded Marine.  The enemy didn’t shoot him because he was a priest, he was just another target.

Hence, St. Gianna Beretta Molla, who lived a virtuous life. She died offering her life for the life of her unborn child.  She made a choice in favor of the life of another that resulted in her death.

Of great importance in this new path is the necessity that it be shown that the person lived a virtuous life before the act of charity that lead to death, and that the act that resulted in death was performed from true charity properly understood.

After that, just as in the cases of martyrdom and of the life of heroic virtue, there must also be a reputation of sanctity and a miracle for beatification, etc., as in the other two paths.

I have a detailed post about this HERE.

Finally, I remind you hams out there that St. Maximilian, was also a ham.

SP3RN!

In 1930, Franciscan Father Maksymilian Maria Kolbe left Poland for Japan, China and India where he organized monasteries. When in Japan, Father Kolbe got acquainted with a network of small broadcasting radio stations. To supplement a large number of religious periodicals that he was publishing in Poland and abroad at that time, he decided to start a radio station as a new medium. In 1930, he applied for a radio broadcasting license in Poland. However, only the Polish Radio Warsaw (1925) and a military radio station held exclusive radio licenses at that time. Radio receivers were allowed to be owned by permission early in 1924.

[…]

More HERE.

 

Also, Zednet exists on the Yaesu System Fusion (Wires-X) “room” 28598, which is cross-linked to Brandmeister (BM) DMR worldwide talkgroup 31429, which essentially gives world-wide multi-mode access to a common ham radio network.  It is “dormant” now. I’d like to fire it up again.  However, it doesn’t all depend on me.  Someone else makes the connections between the different modes.  Echolink is working, I think.  I’ll turn on my radio for that today and monitor as best as I can.

Thanks for remembering St. Max. He is an important man for our sad times, especially as the normal modes of communication are being co-opted by the forces of evil.

A great colorized photo of St. Max.

UPDATE:

Posted in Modern Martyrs, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged
8 Comments

“I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.”

The Gospel reading for the 12th Sunday after Pentecost (Vetus Ordo) was from Luke 10.  It begins with verse 21 in which the Lord rejoices in the Holy Spirit and thanks His Father in Heaven.   However, when we read our readings during the week before Mass, and for a few days after Sunday to refresh and deepen, we should also include context, that is, start reading a bit before and a bit after the assigned reading (pericope).

In Luke 10, the 70 Christ had sent out have returned.  The Lord says:

17 The seventy returned with joy, saying, “Lord, even the demons are subject to us in your name!” 18 And he said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

As I sit in an airport lounge waiting for my next flight, I pick up this on Twitter.   Mind you, I did not watch the closing of the Olympics (first time in my life I didn’t watch any):

I’m sensing a theme with the opening blasphemy.

Coincidence?

Posted in Semper Paratus, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged
11 Comments

My View For Awhile: downhill

The return trip has already had one adventure, which I never like. I like boring trips best. After checking in at zero o’clock and using the double quick security line, the teeessay guy said my eyedee and the airline info for me didn’t match. Present at the booth was a new machine I haven’t seen before. I had to go back to the counter and get an agent to update my information. Crazy. I fly pretty often and I’ve not had this one before. At least I was able to return past all the lines and get cleared.

It occurred to me during this annoyance that there are people who don’t want anyone to be eyedeed before they VOTE.

Meanwhile I’m optimistic that my headphones are packed in my checked bag.

My reading …

more later

UPDATE

One advantage to a really early morning flight is that you often get to your (domestic) destination with some productive daylight remaining.

I hope the crew isn’t as gabby as last flight. The announcements were incessant. Not that it makes a lot of difference on this B712 rattle trap. I thought the last one was going to shed parts as we taxied. There’s no “in seat” entertainment to interrupt.

UPDATE

They have gotten us back and forth from the gate three times. First to check “fluids”. Then to check fuel. Then they didn’t have the numbers of the amount so we had to go back. Then we had to wait for water.

I am not kidding. This has been a clown car, lacking only the oogq-horn.

We are over two hours late and we just started to taxi… again.

Posted in On the road |
Comments Off on My View For Awhile: downhill

Matthew Hazell on the Fishwrap’s defense of the Parisian Blasphemy

Matthew references the piece at the Fishwrap.  It is deeply crass.  Here’s a quote:

Da Vinci’s painting is not a religious object anyway, and is part of the cultural public domain.

The dopey writer cites other examples of appropriated of Christian symbols, some disgusting.  I, also, thought of moments in TV or movies when there was a clear visual reference to da Vinci’s Last Supper, such as a scene near the end of the movie Larry Crowne.  However, they were sugar and spice compared the dreck and bile of the Olympics.

BTW… “da Vinci” isn’t Renaissance Banksy.  He painted his Last Supper in the refectory in a religious convent (for readers of the Fishwrap, that’s a place where people like nuns and friars live… remember them? You might have heard of Friar Tuck, right?  And Tuck is not short for Tucker, which in Australia can mean “food”.  Your version might be older women with short hair who belong to the LCWR).  Moreover, it was painted in the convent’s refectory, where the professed religious took their meals, one of the vital areas of the convent, where it was important… now pay attention, Fishwrappers… important to relate even the taking of food to the salvific work of Christ and not focus on mere bodily satisfaction.  Foreign notions, I know, but bear with me a moment.  The Last Supper is not merely “part of the cultural domain”.  It is also a profoundly religious object, both by intention and by historical-cultural significance.

 

Posted in Sin That Cries To Heaven, What are they REALLY saying?, You must be joking! | Tagged
4 Comments