From Ed Pentin at the National Catholic Register:
Liturgy Sidestepped at Pope Leo XIV’s First Consistory? [With my emphases and comments.]
Cardinals choose evangelization and synodality as key topics, disappointing those who expected the liturgy to be a central theme [’cause it’s only the “fons et culmen”, right? No? Am I wrong?] after recent restrictions on the traditional form of the Roman rite, but the Holy Father later insists the liturgy remains a “very concrete” issue that still needs to be addressed. [Some concrete is more concrete than others.]
ROME — Some cardinals and faithful who have a devotion to the traditional Roman rite have expressed concern that the liturgy appears to be sidelined in the extraordinary consistory currently underway at the Vatican after the cardinals voted to give priority to other issues on the agenda. [What does that say about those cardinals? One the other hand, given who those cardinals probably are, do we really want THEM involved in liturgical discussions?]
In his opening address to the consistory yesterday, Pope Leo XIV reaffirmed to the cardinal participants that they will have the opportunity to “engage in a communal reflection” on four themes already pre-announced to be on the meeting’s agenda. [2+2=…?…3?]
Those topics, he said, were Pope Francis’ 2013 apostolic exhortation Evangelii Gaudium “that is, the mission of the Church in today’s world,” Praedicate Evangelium, the late pope’s apostolic constitution reforming the Roman Curia; the Synod and synodality “as both an instrument and a style of cooperation” and the liturgy, “the source and summit of the Christian life.”
But Leo added that “due to time constraints, and in order to encourage a genuinely in-depth analysis, only two of them will be discussed specifically.”
The cardinals were then asked to make clear which two of the four they would want to be specifically debated and, according to Vatican spokesman Matteo Bruni, “a large majority” decided the topics would be “evangelization and the Church’s missionary activity drawn from rereading Evangelii Gaudium,” and “the Synod and synodality.” [I just had a flash of an image of hundreds of Korean overly-decorated military unison applauding a pre-determined course.] The Pope later thanked the cardinals for making the choice, adding: “The other themes are not lost. There are very concrete, specific issues that we still need to address.”
Bruni told reporters at a press briefing Wednesday evening that the 170 cardinals taking part were divided into 20 groups, which were then divided into two blocks. Eleven groups consisted of cardinals in Rome including curial cardinals and those who have concluded their service and are no longer electors. The remaining 9 groups were cardinal electors of local churches (archbishops and bishops of dioceses), cardinal electors who are nuncios and cardinal electors who have concluded their service but remain electors due to being under the age of 80.
Bruni said that “for reasons of time,” the cardinal secretaries of the second block had the job of reporting back the decision of the cardinals. “They had three minutes to explain the work done within the groups and the reasons that led to the choice of the two themes.” [three minutes… is this serious?]
The Holy Father had made clear in his opening address that it was his preference to hear back from the second block as he does not usually receive advice from those cardinals. “It is naturally easier for me to seek counsel from those who work in the Curia and live in Rome,” he said.
But the decision not to make the liturgy a key theme was disappointing to some cardinals and traditional faithful.
The liturgy has long been a particularly sensitive issue, and especially to traditional-minded Catholics following recent sweeping restrictions on the older form of the Latin rite during Pope Francis’ pontificate. These faithful experienced the restrictions not as a mere disciplinary change but as a judgment on their fidelity, spirituality and ecclesial belonging, which many have described as deeply wounding and divisive.
The popular Italian traditional website Messa in Latino, wrote Jan. 7 that it had contacted some anonymous but important cardinals who all said they were “discouraged and disappointed” about the relegation of the liturgy as a discussion topic.
In comments to the Register Jan. 8, the website’s editor Luigi Casalini asked: “To whom did the Pope delegate this choice, and according to what criteria were these cardinals of the nine local churches selected in order to remove — in effect — two topics?” He also wondered “why cardinals sensitive to the issue” appear to have “made no attempt to lobby” for the liturgy to be included as a core topic of discussion, “even before the consistory.” [Because that sort of cardinal isn’t like the other sort of cardinal. They don’t instinctively use the tactics of the left.]
The consistory, he added, “appears to be in perfect continuity with the Synods and the thought of Francis” — [Hence] a reference to how recent synods were silent on the traditional liturgy.
Speaking to journalists Wednesday, Bruni tried to offer some reassurance. “The other two themes will still be addressed in some way, because mission does not exclude the liturgy,” he said. “On the contrary, in many ways it does not mean exclusion. It means that they will still be addressed within the others or in some other way.” [In other words, it isn’t going to be discussed. This VatiSpeak is getting worse.]
He added: “As the Pope said and as he noted in both his opening and closing speeches [on Wednesday], the themes cannot be separated from each other, because in mission and evangelization there is liturgy.” [You need a microscope to spot it in modern notions of mission and evangelization… but I assure you, it’s in there! In some way or another.]
Casalini said he was looking ahead to the two free discussions today to see “whether the topic of the liturgy will be taken up again.” [I think I’ll go back to playing chess now.]











I always enjoy your Christmas cards. The notes and letters which describe the year people have had are interesting and, often, moving. Over the years I’ve recognized so many familiar names. I read them all. And drawings by kids are great! A couple years ago, I started a 





































