Corpus Christi: I affirm my subjugation to Christ vanquisher of hell and my sins.

In the traditional Roman calendar for the 1962 Missale Romanum yesterday, Thursday, was the Feast of Corpus Domini, or Corpus Christi.  In the post-Conciliar Missal’s calendar today is also Corpus Christi.

In the Novus Ordo –  Vetus too, with “external celebration” – many people will observe Corpus Christi on Sunday, which ensures that more people will participate.

I don’t object as much to the transference of Corpus Christi to Sunday as I do to the appalling removal of Ascension Thursday to Sunday.  Ascension Thursday is, after all, Scriptural and of very ancient observance.  Corpus Christi is a comparatively new development: it was established in the 13th century.

ASIDE: Embedded above is a photo I took some years ago in the Vatican Gardens during a Corpus Christi procession.  That great edifice in the background is back of St. Peter’s Basilica.  It isn’t often you get Swiss Guards to carry the canopy.

At the request of an Augustinian nun, Juliana of Cornillon, in 1246 the Bishop of Liège, Robert of Thourotte, instituted in his diocese a feast now known as Corpus Christi.  A few years later, following a great Eucharistic miracle in which a priest suffering doubts witnessed a Host become flesh and bleed on the linen corporal, Pope Urban IV n 1264 ordered the feast of the Body of Christ to be celebrated by the universal Church on the Thursday after Trinity Sunday.  The Angelic Doctor, St Thomas Aquinas (d 1274), composed the feast’s Mass and Office.  The Collect for the Mass, also used during Benediction with the Blessed Sacrament, was assumed into the 1570 Missale Romanum.  It has remained unchanged.

Deus, qui nobis sub sacramento mirabili passionis tuae memoriam reliquisti, tribue, quaesumus, ita nos Corporis et Sanguinis tui sacra mysteria venerari, ut redemptionis tuae fructum in nobis iugiter sentiamus.

Iugiter, an adverb, is from iugum, “a yoke or collar for horses”, “beam, lath, or rail fastened in a horizontal direction to perpendicular poles or posts, a cross-beam”.  Iugiter means “continuously”, as if one moment in time is being yoked together with the next, and the next, and so on.

LITERAL TRANSLATION:

O God, who bequeathed to us under a wondrous sacrament the memorial of Your Passion, grant to us, we implore, to venerate the sacred mysteries of Your Body and Blood in such a way that we constantly sense within us the fruit of Your redemption.

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

O God, who in this wonderful Sacrament have left us a memorial of your Passion, grant us, we pray, so to revere the sacred mysteries of your Body and Blood that we may always experience in ourselves the fruits of your redemption.

In the 1980’s we seminarians were informed with a superior sneer that, “Jesus said ‘Take and eat, not sit and look!’”  Somehow, “looking” was opposed to “receiving”, “doing”.  This same error is at the root of false propositions about “active participation”: if people aren’t constantly singing or carrying stuff they are “passive”.

Younger people no longer have that baggage, happily.  They desire the all good things of our Catholic patrimony.  They want as much as Holy Church can give.  They resist passé attempts to make Jesus “smaller”.

After the Second Vatican Council, many liturgists (all but a few?) asserted that, because modern man is all grown up now, Eucharistic devotions are actually harmful rather than helpful.  We mustn’t crawl in submission before God anymore.  We won’t grovel in archaic triumphal processions or kneel as if before some king.  We are urbane adults, not child-like peasants below a father or feudal master.  We stand and take rather than kneel and receive.

This lie from Hell has damaged our Catholic identity!

Some details of society have changed like shifting sandbars, but man doesn’t change.  God remains transcendent. We poor, fallen human beings need concrete things through which we can perceive invisible realities.

The bad old days of post-Conciliar denigration of wholesome devotional practices may linger, but the aging-hippie priests and liberal liturgists have lost most of their ground under the two-fold pincer of common sense and the genuine Catholic love people have for Jesus in the Eucharist. There was also the deep, ongoing influence of Summorum Pontificum, which spurred a recovery of our patrimony.

The customs of Corpus Christi processions, Forty Hours Devotion, and Eucharistic Adoration seem to be returning in force.  More and more I hear about processions.  And this year, because of the effort at a revival of belief in the Eucharistic, processions are multiplying.

People want and need these devotions.  They help us to be better Catholic Christians through contact with Christ and through giving public witness to our faith.

I digress.  Back to work.

The iugum (whence iugiter) was a symbol for defeat and slavery.  A victorious Roman general compelled the vanquished to pass under a yoke (sub iugum, “subjugate”) made of spears.  Prisoners were later yoked together and paraded in the returning general’s triumph procession.

In worldly terms, crosses and yokes are instruments of bitter humiliation.

Jesus says His yoke is “sweet” and “light”.

Christ invites us to learn His ways through the image of His yoke upon our shoulders (Matthew 11:29-30). 

True freedom lies precisely in subjugation to Him.  His yokes are sweet yokes.  He did not defeat us to give us His yoke. He defeated death in us to raise us by His yoke.  In honoring the Blessed Sacrament we proclaim with the Triumphant Victor Christ, “O death, where is thy victory? O death, where is thy sting?” (cf 1 Cor 15:54b – 57).

Proponents of authentic “liberation theology” take Christ the Liberator into the public square. In the sight of onlookers, we march in His honor, profess His gift of salvation, and kneel before Him.

We cannot honor enough this pledge of our future glory in Heaven, the Body and Precious Blood of Christ.

I affirm my subjugation to Christ, Victor over death, hell and my sins.  Before the Eucharist, Jesus my God and King, I am content to kneel until with His own hand He raises me.

O sacrum convivium, in quo Christus sumitur: recolitur memoria passionis eius; mens impletur gratia et futurae gloriae nobis pignus datur.

O sacred banquet, in which Christ is received, the memory of His Passion is renewed, the mind is filled with grace, and a pledge of future glory given to us.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, WDTPRS |
3 Comments

The TLM will live on!

Posted in Lighter fare |
2 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1035

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – UK HERE  WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

White to move and mate in 2.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

In Norway, Hikaru Nakamura is the leader after his victory over Praggnanandhaa Rameshbabu (aka Pragg) on Thursday’s Round 4. Magnus beat Fabiana Caruana. Sadly, for more than one reason, Alireza Firouzja bested Ding Liren. Everyone is wondering what’s up with Ding. He is at the bottom of the standings. Carlsen is now just 23.6 points ahead of Caruana. And look at poor Ding.

In the upcoming Chess Olympiad, 10-23 Sept in Budapest – gosh, I would love to visit Budapest – Richard Rapport will again play for his native Hungary rather than Romania. Also Peter Leko is coming back.

OPPORTUNITY
10% off with code:
FATHERZ10

One year ago today, it was my last full day in Rome for the spring Roman Sojourn. I continually pray for my Roman donors, even after the fact. I will not forget you.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Feminists will not like this

At the Italian news agency ANSA we find out a little more about what Francis has said to the gathering of priests of the Diocese of Rome ordained during the last 10 years, some 150.

The Pope, ‘chattering is women’s stuff’

The website Silere non possumus reports it. Francis would then add [NB: Italian giornalistic style at times resorts to the conditional “avrebbe aggiunto” to pad the statement a little, like saying “seems to have… or allegedly” even when it is a clear fact.] that in Rome ‘there are corruption problems in the Vicariate’

After the controversy over the colorful expressions that the Pope allegedly used [avrebbe usato] to talk about homosexuals in seminaries, in another closed-door meeting, yesterday’s one with young Roman priests, Pope Francis asked them to avoid bad-mouthing, saying that “chattering is something for women.”  [Chiacchiera is “chit-chat” but also commonly “gossip”. I think “gossip” was meant here.]

The website ‘Silere non possum’ writes it.

Pope Francis would have added: “We have trousers, we have to say things.” Again according to the same site, the Pope responded to a young priest on the situation of the diocese of Rome, Francis replied: “There are problems of corruption”.

The site Silere non possumus (SNP) has some comments which are worrisome.

 

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments

More on Confirmation and quizzing

A little while ago, I posted about bishops quizzing and slapping confirmands.  In that post I had the responses of several bishops about their experiences and practices.  HERE

One of my correspondents (and fellow ham) who attends an SSPX chapel wrote to me:

My 10 year old was thoroughly quizzed by our priest two weeks before confirmation. She had to memorize the better part of this book. It’s a great book and I watched the kids all line up waiting to go in to Father’s office to be questioned and their copies were all thrashed. I know our daughter read it every night for months before hand and it looked like they all had. 31 or 33 total kids in our tiny chapel… it was an amazing day.

The book in question is not new. 1996. And it is from the Baltimore Catechism, so it is even older.  A good thing.  It is from the SSPX’s Angelus Press.

Preparation for Confirmation by Baltimore Catechism

US HERE – UK HERE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It starts with the minimum prayers one must know to be confirmed.

I am not a bishop, and you are probably confirmed already, but allow me to ask you:

Can you recite the Acts of Faith, Hope, Love and Contrition?  

You probably do know an Act of Contrition. I favor the one in this book, the old fashioned one that says more, concisely.

Can you recite the Precepts of the Church?

I think the versions vary now.  The CCC lists five and relegates one to a a “duty” (support of the Church).

Can you recite the Seven Gifts of the Holy Spirit and explain what they are?

Can you say what the bishop recites when is consecrates Sacred Chrism?

What are the duties of the confirmand?

Just a few questions from the booklet.

I am aware that there are fellow Catholics, active and fallen away, who have not opened a catechism or cracked a book about the Faith since the day they were confirmed… or maybe when they made their 1st Communion… or ever, perhaps.  I suspect there are priests who can’t tell you what confirmation is about.

Each year we should make a review of the basis of the faith.  They don’t change, but we do.  Each year we are able to benefit from what we read in a new way.

This little booklet is handy.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
4 Comments

30 May – St. Joan of Arc, Virgin: Martyrology, Marvelous reading, Movies

It is not only the Feast of Corpus Christi (the real feast, although I don’t object to its transfer or observance to Sunday), it is the Feast of St. Joan of Arc.

St. Joan is a great model for young people of both sexes (yes, there are only two).  And there is nothing “woke” or “trans” about her!

She is an antidote to evil stupid.

I have a link to the Joan Movie Marathon.  Since I posted that I have seen also the two films by Jacques Rivette starting Sandrine Bonnaire, which are quite well done.    HERE

OLDIE POST ___

Today we celebrate the feast of the quintessential “¡Hagan lío!” gal.

Today, in the 2005 Martyrologium Romanum we find interesting saints, including St. Petronilla and St. Ferdinand III, King of Castille.  We also find Otto Neururer, a priest who died in Buchenwald (more HERE), and Luke Kirby, a priest who died on the Tyburn Tree along with William Filby, Lawrence Johnson and Thomas Cottam during the reign of Elizabeth I.  There are also William Scott, Richard Newport in the reign of James I.   Matthis Kalemba was killed by Muslims in Uganda.  In ancient times St. Gabinus died a martyr in Sardinia.  St. Dymphna died in Brabant.

So much death.  So much glory.

My Roman Curia calendar also says it is the Novus Ordo Feast of Ferdinand of Castille.

The most interesting, to me at least, is that of St. Joan of Arc.

Her entry.  Perhaps some of you readers would like to try your hand…

Rothomagi in Normannia Galliae, sanctae Ioanne d’Arc, virginis, puellae Aurelianensis nuncupatae, quae, cum fortiter pro patria dimicasset, tandem in hostium potestatem tradita iniquo iudicio condemnata est et igne cremata.

I have long thought that St. Joan of Arc is a fine saint to inspire young people, including boys, because of her martial spirit.

A friend of mine in the Swiss Guard has Joan etched on his breastplate… and some of you, dear readers, made that happen!  Remember that project? We had a campaign here to raise money for his armor.  Here’s a shot from last 6 May 2016 during the swearing in of the new Guards.  And there’s Joan!

17_05_06_Giuramento_01

On the other side is St. Joseph.  Very cool.

Pope Benedict spoke of St. Joan in a General Audience in 2011. Here is the VIS account of the audience.  My emphases and comments.

JOAN OF ARC: BRINGING THE LIGHT OF THE GOSPEL INTO HISTORY

St. Joan of ArcVATICAN CITY, 26 JAN 2011 (VIS) – During this morning’s general audience, celebrated in the Paul VI Hall in the presence of 3,000 people, Holy Father dedicated his catechesis to St. Joan of Arc (1412-1431), whom he described as “one of the ‘strong women’ who, at the end of the Middle Ages, fearlessly brought the splendid light of the Gospel into the complex events of history”. [I wonder if many Catholics today haven’t been cowed by the relentless secularism and relativism and even open anti-Catholic bigotry we find in the public square.  And now we have anti-Catholic behavior from highly visible leaders of the public square and in the Church.  We need a revitalization of our Catholic identity.  It won’t be accomplished with what we have been doing.  It’s time for a change.]

The life of Joan of Arc, who was born into a prosperous peasant family, took place in the context of the conflict between France and England known as the Hundred Years War. At the age of thirteen, “through the ‘voice’ of St. Michael the Archangel, Joan felt herself called by the Lord to intensify her Christian life and to act personally to free her people”.

She made a vow of virginity and redoubled her prayers, participating in sacramental life with renewed energy. “This young French peasant girl’s compassion and commitment in the face of her people’s suffering were made even more intense through her mystical relationship with God. One of the most original aspects of her sanctity was this bond between mystical experience and political mission”. said Benedict XVI.

Joan’s activities began in early 1429 when, overcoming all obstacles, she managed to meet with the French Dauphin, the future King Charles VII. He had her examined by theologians of the University of Poitiers who “delivered a positive judgment, they discovered nothing bad in her, and found her to be a good Christian”.

On 22 March of that year Joan dictated a letter to the King of England and his men, who were laying siege to the city of Orleans. “Hers was a proposal of authentic and just peace between two Christian peoples, in the light of the names of Jesus and Mary”, said the Holy Father. But the offer was rejected and Joan had to fight for the liberation of the city. Another culminating moment of her endeavours came on 17 July 1429 when King Charles was crowned in Reims.

Joan’s passion began on 23 May 1430 when she fell into the hands of her enemies at Compiegne and was taken to the city of Rouen. There a long and dramatic trial was held which concluded with her being condemned to death on 30 May 1431.

The trial was presided by two ecclesiastical judges, Bishop Pierre Cauchon [Somehow appropriate.] and the inquisitor Jean le Maistre, but in fact it was conducted by a group of theologians from the University of Paris. These “French ecclesiastics, having made political choices opposed to those of Joan, were predisposed to hold negative views of her person and mission. The trial was a dark page in the history of sanctity, but also a shining page in the mystery of the Church which is, … ‘at the same time holy and always in need of being purified’“.

“Unlike the saintly theologians who illuminated the University of Paris, such as St. Bonaventure, St. Thomas Aquinas and Blessed Duns Scotus, … the judges were theologians who lacked the charity and humility to see the work of God in this young girl. Jesus’ words come to mind, according to which the mysteries of God are revealed to those who have the hearts of children, but hidden from the wise and intelligent. Thus Joan’s judges were radically incapable of understanding her, of seeing the beauty of her soul“, the Pope said.

Joan died at the stake on 30 May 1431, holding a crucifix in her hands and invoking the name of Jesus. Twenty-five years later a trial of nullification, instituted by Pope Callixtus III, “concluded with a solemn sentence nullifying the condemnation and … highlighting Joan of Arc’s innocence and perfect faithfulness to the Church. Much later, in 1920, she was canonised by Pope Benedict XV“.  [I am happy to have a relic of St. Joan, which: ashes collected at the time and place of her execution by burning.]

The Name of Jesus invoked by this saint in the last instants of her earthly life was as the continual breath of her soul, … the centre of her entire life”, the Holy Father explained. “This saint understood that Love embraces all things of God and man, of heaven and earth, of the Church and the world. … Liberating her people was an act of human justice, which Joan performed in charity, for love of Jesus, hers is a beautiful example of sanctity for lay people involved in political life, especially in the most difficult situations”.  [In his first Message for the World Day for Peace, Pope Benedict spoke of the need of military intervention at times in order to establish the foundation upon which peace can be fostered.]

“Joan saw in Jesus all the reality of the Church, the ‘Church triumphant’ in heaven and the ‘Church militant’ on earth. In her own words, ‘Our Lord and the Church are one’. This affirmation … takes on a truly heroic aspect in the context of the trial, in the face of her judges, men of the Church who persecuted and condemned her”.

“With her shining witness St. Joan of Arc invites us to the highest degree of Christian life, making prayer the motif of our days, having complete trust in achieving the will of God whatever it may be, living in charity without favouritisms or limitations, and finding in the Love of Jesus, as she did, a profound love for His Church”.

Furthermore, if you have never read Mark Twain’s superb novel about St. Joan do try to get it soon? Twain, not exactly friendly toward the Church, thought it was his finest work.

This would be terrific summer reading also for young people who can read a little above their age.

US HERE – UK HERE

It is on Kindle, too, for $0.99!   With Prime.

If you are not a Prime member, HERE  [Also… Try Prime Discounted Monthly Offering

Some years ago, I spent an evening watching some of a Joan of Arc movie marathon. I wrote about it HERE.

St. Joan, pray for us!

Finally, I have a relic of St. Joan.  This is of the ashes from her pyre.

Yes, I know it should be “ex pulvere”.  I am happy to have it.

Finally, finally, honorable mention goes to The Miracle of the Bells with Frank Sinatra as a priest and Fred MacMurray.

Frank sings in Polish and Fred helps an ill-fated woman get cast in a movie as St. Joan.   1948.

1948, the same year as the Ingrid Bergman version.

Posted in Linking Back, Saints: Stories & Symbols, SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Explaining what Francis really meant, etc.

A few items caught my eye…

First, I’ve been reading the explanations of what Francis really meant to say when he explicitly complained that in Italian seminaries there was excessive “faggotry” and that “fags/queers” (checche) shouldn’t be in seminary, even those who are “semi inclinati”.

For those of you who read Italian, here is a shot of a newspaper page today.  The article at the bottom quotes bishops doing cartwheels to explain what Francis really meant.  Right click and open in a new tab for larger.

It’s predictable, but still clever.  One guy blames his brother bishop for telling what had been said.  Another, he’s from South America and doesn’t know what words mean.  Another, he’s just worried about the happiness of future priests.  About checche in seminaries, to which Francis has in the past said “no”:  “Non c’è un ‘no’ a priori…. There is no a priori ‘no'”.  So, it all depends on what “no” means.  Ask 60 Minutes.  Another guy, it was a confidential conversation and personal observations were mixed with general considerations.  Whatever that means.  Another, we ought to pay attention to what he does not only what he says.  I remind everyone that speaking is doing something too.   Another, he simply used “un linguaggio più scherzoso… a playful tone”.  Yeah, he was just kidding around.    The same fellow offered this as well: “One part of the Church is, instead, convinced that there exist sinners and non-sinners.”  The issue here is not whether anyone out there is or isn’t a sinner.  That’s been answered already.  The issue is a particular kind of sin and inclination toward that sin.  However, I am mindful of old descriptions of the characteristics a man should have when considering entering the seminary.  One of them was/is: Can you live for extended periods of time in the state of grace?   So, I guess sin might matter.

At Jesuit run Amerika there is a piece that reassumes much of this in English.

Then there are the usual suspects.

At Fishwrap we find Michael Sean Winters (aka Madame Defarge) went to the zoo and found the most exotic of excuses.

The fact that the pope may have used a vulgar Italian word, frociaggine — translated as “queerness” in most media accounts but I suspect “campiness” is closer to what was meant — when discussing the subject suggests he might have had in mind precisely such a situation.

This elicited gales of laughter from my Italian friends.  No: frociaggine is “faggotry”.  That’s what Francis was talking about, not only a penchant for show tunes, sibilants, and pink high top sneakers (as one guy had in our day in St. Paul).

He goes on to tie this gaffe control with spaghetti against the wall: into how the Church treats women and how we have to listen to the Holy Spirit and get into the “synodal (walking together) process”.

As the many negative reactions to Fiducia Supplicans demonstrated, the church has not reached any kind of consensus on issues related to ministry to gay men and women. Here is where the promise of synodality emerges. It aims to attune everyone in the church to listen to the promptings of the Holy Spirit, to relativize what I want or you want with what God wants. Discerning God’s will is something the church must do together. The whole must judge the parts.

You knew that Jesuit homosexualist James Martin would have to pipe up.  I was sent a piece from Breitbart with his quotes.

“In my 25 years as a priest and almost 40 as a Jesuit, I’ve known hundreds of holy, faithful and celibate gay priests,” Father Martin wrote on X. “They’ve been my superiors, my teachers, my confessors, my mentors, my spiritual directors and my friends.”

The Jesuit order, in fact, is known to have a remarkably high percentage of homosexual members, making it unsurprising that Father Martin has had gay priests as superiors, confessors, mentors, teachers, and spiritual directors.

According to the estimates of one of Martin’s Jesuit brothers, some 50 percent of the members of the Jesuit order are homosexual.

“Roughly half of the Society under the age of fifty shuffles on the borderline between declared and undeclared gayness,” wrote Jesuit Father Paul Shaughnessy in a 2002 essay in the Weekly Standard, titled, “Are the Jesuits Catholic?”

In his piece, Father Shaughnessy added that “the majority of Jesuit formatores, Jesuits in charge of training, are homosexual as well.”

For Catholics, Father Martin continued, gay priests have “celebrated Masses for you, baptized your children, heard your confessions, visited you in hospitals, presided at your weddings and buried your parents.”

“The church would be immeasurably poorer without them,” he concluded.

How wonderful the Jesuits are!  However, this begs us to ask: If they are so great this way, how much greater would they be if they were all straight?

 

Posted in Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Drill |
7 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1034

Never mind about the inaccuracies in the audio, this is great.

White to move and mate in 3.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

In chessy News, Norway Chess continues and it is not going well for Magnus.  After 3 rounds Praggnanandhaa Rameshbabu (Pragg) leads after beating world #1 Magnus Carlsen for the first time in classical chess. Fabi beat Dign and Hikaru beat Firouzja (yay!).

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Daily Rome Shot 1033

The World’s Best Sacristan™ sent me a little video of entering the church, so I found some photos and zipped it up with music by Domenico Zipoli who in 1715 was the organist at the Jesuits great Church in Rome, the Gesù. He eventually went to Paraguay to work in the Jesuit Reductions among the Guarani (think The Mission). The images and video were of uneven resolutions, so, it will fuzzy if you blow it up.  I rendered it at 640×360.

In Norway yesterday, Magnus beat Hikaru.   Just recalled that Star Trek’s Sulu was named Hikaru.  Hmmm.  Magnus is in the lead.  In other news, water is still wet.   Ding beat Pragg and, alas, Firouzja bested Fabi when the world #2, who was winning, blundered into a nasty fork with under 2 minutes on the clock.   Can you see it?  Black to move.

It’s not to hard.  Time pressure is dreadful.  I find it consoling, however, that even these titans of the game will occasionally do this.  I wish it had been the other way around, however.

Because of the great news from Norcia, I’ll plug them again.  Yesterday, one of our regular commentators said that the Norcia beer was some of the best he has ever had.

Meanwhile, in Eccles brackets for Catholic leaders, I am going down in flames against His Eminence Robert Card. Sarah. One of my correspondents congratulated me for being the only non-bishop in the field and I that I might have had a chance in the quarters against Vigano. “Tough draw.”  Tough field!  I’d still like to make a good race of it, not that I can do anything about it, of course.  Maybe we could arm wrestle for it?

How do you choose?  Really!  How?   In the case of Card. Sarah and the undersigned, it isn’t so hard, I suppose.  Maybe if I had earlier revealed my status as a Monsignor in pectore?  And, come to think of it, I did win in the non-bishop category.

Meanwhile, thank you to C&ML for the gift card from my wish list.  Also, Roman Sojourn Donors, who are still in my regular prayers.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – UK HERE  WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

I’d watch THIS movie anytime!

Keep watching to the end. It’s not long.

I simply could not not share this.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare |
4 Comments