UPDATES BELOW: 21 Dec ’23 – 12:52
BTW… you know what the next step is, right? Already there?
Change the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
ORIGINALLY Published on: Dec 20, 2023
One online priest, a homosexualist, said:
“As a priest I look forward to blessing same-sex couples, sharing with them the graces that God desires for everyone, something I’ve waited years to do.”
I’ll just bet you waited. Sure, you did.
The problem with a statement like this is that, if a person in disposed to receive them, all persons can receive the graces that God desires to give. Also God does not desire to give the same graces to everyone. Some yes, such as sanctifying grace, of course. Some, yes, prevenient graces, of course.
He also wrote:
“Be wary of the “Nothing has changed” response to today’s news. It’s a significant change. In short, yesterday, as a priest, I was forbidden to bless same-sex couples at all. Today, with some limitations, I can.”
Now what?
Hey look! A spontaneous blessing! With a spontaneous NY Times photographer who was spontaneously hanging out!
Meanwhile, the Bishops of Malawi and Zambia (at least) [UPDATE – and Ukrainians and Polish] have prohibited priests from giving blessings to “couples”. The Archbishop of Astana, Kazakhstan and Bp. Schneider issued a letter which is strongly against this move.
Also, this is an astute observation on the part of an acquaintance of mine. I spotted this the instant I heard about the document: all blessings are, in a sense, liturgical. However the new document says the blessings of “couples” aren’t to be liturgical.
So, I guess they aren’t to be given?
I dislike the Book of Blessings, which is ironically bereft of blessings. The point is that a priestly blessing, even a simple one, has a liturgical character.
Moreover,…
And then…
Of course the moderation queue is ON and I will be picky.
QUAERITUR:
Will there be a Latin text of “Fiducia supplicans”? There’s a title!
UPDATES 21 Dec ’23:
Here’s something from a Cardinal who defended Amoris… which lead to Fiducia.
Meanwhile, Fr. Thomas Weinandy, theologian of note but seemingly an enemy of traditional liturgy … so, he is NOT one of those American trads that Rome seems to blame everything on… and neither are the bishops conferences of MALAWI or NIGERIA or ZAMBIA…
At The Catholic Thing, this is pretty hard core…
[…]
The pope or a bishop maybe, by virtue of his office, a member of the magisterium, but his teaching, if it contradicts the received previous magisterial teaching, is not magisterial. Such false teaching simply fails to meet the necessary criteria. It possesses no ecclesial authoritative credentials. Rather, it is simply an ambiguous or flawed statement that attempts or pretends to be magisterial, when it’s not.
Second, to bless couples in irregular marriages or same-sex couples without giving the impression that the Church is not validating their sexual activity is a charade. All those present at such blessings know, without a doubt, that such relationships are sexual in nature. No one is fooled. Actually, they are rejoicing that such sexual relations are being blessed. That’s the point of these blessings. It is not their sexual abstinence being blessed, but their sexual indulgence.
Third, while couples in irregular marriages and same-sex couples can be blessed, what cannot be blessed, and so validated, is the sin in which they are engaged. It is impossible to bless an immoral act, and to attempt to do so is blasphemy, for one is asking the all-holy God to do something that is contrary to his nature — the sanctioning of sin. Moreover, to bless irregular marriages and same-sex couples, for the purposes of authenticating their sexual activity, is an affront to and a demeaning of the sacrament of marriage itself. Such blessings undermine the dignity of marriage — a sacramental sign of the indissoluble union between Christ and his Church.
[…]
At The Pillar I read a piece by former Prefect of the CDF – who knows more than his prayers – Gerhard Card. Müller. The old phrase is “Qui distinguit bene docet… He teaches well who makes distinctions”. Müller breaks blessings down into three categories, two which are consistent with Catholic teaching and practice and one which has been invented from whole cloth (guess which kind). He demonstrates that FS is self-contradictory.
[…]
With the Declaration Fiducia supplicans (FS) on the Pastoral Significance of Blessings, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) has made an affirmation that has no precedent in the teaching of the Catholic Church. In fact, this document affirms that it is possible for a priest to bless (not liturgically, but privately) couples who live in a sexual relationship outside of marriage, including same-sex couples. The many questions raised by bishops, priests, and laity in response to these statements deserve a clear and unequivocal response.
Does this statement not clearly contradict Catholic teaching? Are the faithful obliged to accept this new teaching? May the priest perform such new practices that have just been invented? And can the diocesan bishop forbid them if they were to take place in his diocese? To answer these questions, let us see what exactly the document teaches and what arguments it relies on.
The document, which was neither discussed nor approved by the General Assembly of Cardinals and Bishops of this Dicastery, acknowledges that the hypothesis (or teaching?) it proposes is new and that it is based primarily on the pastoral magisterium of Pope Francis.
[…]
The last statement is accurate. Remember Fernandez stating something about the primacy of the “magisterium of Francis”?
Here are the footnotes of FS.

I note that the footnotes cite De Benedictionibus (the infamous “Book of Blessings” – which has only one prayer that bless things because the idea was to destroy the categories of invocative and constitutive) says that all blessings are “liturgical” and yet FS says that whatever it is that is to be imparted is not to be “liturgical.
The 500 strong Confraternity of Catholic Clergy in England and Wales put this out.

By contrast, sort of… Bp. Barron of Winona-Rochester in my native Minnesota…

FS is “congruent with the the pastoral instincts of Pope Francis”. Okay. Very deft. But is it congruent with Catholic teaching and perennial practice? There ought to be someone nearby every Pope who says, “Ummm… we need to think this through.” I wonder what role the official “Papal Theologian” had… has had… has had for a while.
Again in my native Minnesota, Bp. Cozzens (who was in seminary behind me) of Crookston wrote HERE:
[…]
This blessing is not for people seeking a legitimation of same sex union but for those seeking to live better: “there is no intention to legitimize anything, but rather to open one’s life to God, to ask for his help to live better, and also to invoke the Holy Spirit so that the values of the Gospel may be lived with greater faithfulness” (FS 40).
[…]
And of course, as the Vatican made clear, “Any blessing will be an opportunity for a renewed proclamation of the kerygma, an invitation to draw ever closer to the love of Christ” (FS, 44). Thus, when people come to the Church seeking her blessing let us also proclaim to them the saving love of Jesus found through repentance for all of us who are sinners.
[…]
With due respect to His Excellency, I don’t think the Vatican made this issue clear. At least that statement ends with the point that there must be repentance.
Archbp. Viganò... well… “servants of Satan”… “delirious Declaration”… “abomination of desolation”… you get the drift. I think that’s a “No” vote for FS.
A priest of the Companions of Christ, present on the interwebs, has a couple of self-apologetic videos about FS and his intention to … well… bless same-sex couples. The first one HERE says that this is an excellent document and a “victory” for conservative Catholics. The second one HERE is apologetic (in the technical sense) defending his previous stance. There’s a lot of emotion. I think Father needs to think about this more.
At Crisis Magazine, Msgr. Richard C. Antall has a piece called “Prudence and Symbolic Ambiguity” with the tag “If you knew that the person was going to misunderstand your blessing, would it be right to let him or her be in vincible ignorance?”
There’s a lot more out there.
Out of the chaos some clarity will emerge.
In the meantime, please consider what I wrote the other day:
More than ever there is greater need and urgency that we make sure our own “houses are in order”. If you don’t already,…
- start making thorough and honest examinations of conscience.
- Start making reparation for wrongs and sins.
- Undertake sincerely to forgive those who have harmed you.
- Do penances.
- Seek to purify memories.
- Perform corporal and spiritual works of mercy.
- Dedicate some time each day to prayer, especially the Rosary.
- Attend to the duties of your state in life.
- Read Scripture and review your catechism.
- Pray for priests and bishops.
- Go to confession regularly.
- Receive Communion only in the state of grace.
UPDATE 12 Dec 17:25
This is pretty big.