For the Bishop of Charlotte

Just a moment of your time, Your Excellency…

75% of Charlotte Seminarians Come from Parishes with Altar Rails

This weekend the faithful of Charlotte have learned that as of the 1st Sunday of Advent November 30, 2025, Bishop Michael Martin has ordered that altar rails should no longer be used for the distribution of Holy Communion in the Diocese of Charlotte. Additionally, any parishes using kneelers (or unfixed rails) must remove them. This, we have been told, is to remain consistent with the norms established by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

While just announced, the faithful are already being told that obedience requires submission. However, we have also heard (unconfirmed) that some priests may be reviewing this with canon lawyers or even requesting a clarification from Rome. We hope that more seek this route as the USCCB does not forbid the use of altar rails, but rather simply states that the norm is to receive standing, while fully permitting the faithful to kneel. It would seem to be a matter of both justice and charity for the Church to provide assistance for those who choose to kneel (accomplished by distributing at a rail).

Indeed, the cultural norm at a significant number of parishes in the diocese is for the faithful to receive kneeling and on the tongue. However, it isn’t just the number of parishes that is interesting, but rather, which parishes and what else is happening there.

This past week the USCCB celebrated its annual National Vocation Awareness Week. As stated on their website:

“National Vocations Awareness Week…is an annual week-long celebration of the Catholic Church in the United States dedicated to promoting vocations to the priesthood, diaconate, and consecrated life…”

One of the most healthy and robust areas inherited by Bishop Martin from his predecessor Bishop Peter Jugis is priestly vocations. Currently Charlotte lists 44 seminarians on their website, an impressive number for a diocese of about half a million Catholics. Additionally, the diocese has ordained 13 men to the priesthood in just the past 2 years, with another 7 11 set to be ordained in 2026.

[Update: I have been informed that 3 other seminarians are being ordained to the transitional diaconate next month and will also be ordained to the priesthood in 2026. Additionally, we have one seminarian being ordained for the FSSP next May].

But there’s something else interesting about the boom in vocations in the Charlotte diocese: 75% of those young men come from parishes where the use of altar rails or communion kneelers has been the norm. Consider that: 3 out of every 4 men in seminary in Charlotte had their vocations fostered in parishes which utilize altar rails.

To be clear, in no way should we assume that correlation is causation; obviously the discernment process and the fostering of vocations is complex: from God’s call, to the prayerful attentiveness to hear and to say yes, to the support at home from family, as well as from the parish community and the pastor.

However, it would also seem irresponsible to ignore that 75% of Charlotte’s current seminarians, and well over half of their recent classes of ordinands, come from such parishes. A recent study even suggested what many of the faithful would say is obvious: how we receive the Eucharist, and how a community supports that reception through traditional practices such as kneeling for communion, plays a sizable part in Eucharistic reverence and belief.

As we consider all of these matters we can only hope that someone will share this information with Bishop Martin.

For the links in the article, go over to the original at Liturgy Guy (linked at the top).

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, Seminarians and Seminaries | Tagged ,
31 Comments

My View For Awhile: the last leg

In Rome the sun rose at 6:52 and set at 16:56.

17:30 is the slated time for the ringing of the Ave Maria bell.

Where I am now the sun rose at 6:36. Where I will wind up Deo Volente the sun will set at 17:31.

It is the Feast of Pope St Leo the Great.

Everything seemed in slow motion at the airport today, check in, bag scanners, people. Odd.

And my flight is delayed – not departure but arrival, making the flight even longer.

We are mostly done with the boarding process and half the plane is empty. Unexpected.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on My View For Awhile: the last leg

Your Sunday Sermon Notes – Dedication of the Lateran 2025

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all.

Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for this Feast of the Dedication of the Lateran.

Tell about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

A couple thoughts about the sign of the cross: HERE  A taste…

[…]

Every person has a “name day” and a “birthday.” So too a church. Our churches are dedicated or consecrated in honor of saints or mysteries of the Faith. The celebration of the dedication recalls the sanctity of the place which, as a consecrated building, has been removed from the temporal order and given entirely to God.

Church buildings should be rich in sacred symbols. This includes a sanctuary with its altar, the sacred space within the sacred space mirroring the Holy of Holies in the Temple of Jerusalem. The prayers for the solemn consecration of a church, especially in the older, traditional Roman Rite, connect the earthly church building to the heavenly Jerusalem of the life to come, described in Scriptures especially in the Book of Revelation.

There are parallels in the rites of the consecration of a church and the rites of Baptism. There are exorcisms. The is washing with water, anointing with Chrism and naming. Alphabets are given in the church as the “opening rites” are given in baptism. And so forth. More on this below.

The rite of consecration and the annual feast of its dedication reflect that the church building is a house of prayer and the place of sacrifice. It is a foreshadowing of the heavenly Jerusalem. It is the microcosm of the Church Universal, the nuptial chamber of the Spouse and the Bride, the way to Calvary and the Garden of the Tomb.

[…]

Posted in Sermons | Tagged
8 Comments

Reid on the liturgical challenges facing Leo XIV

Dom Alcuin Reid has a thoughtful piece at the UK’s Catholic Herald which ever so cordially employs paywalls.

Here’s the last part of Reid’s offering with some emphases and comments.

He starts out stating that Leo XIV seems liturgically level-headed and dignified.  It would be helpful were he to stress what Benedict XVI called ars celebrandi in his Sacramentum caritatis.

[…]

The second area in which the Holy Father will have to exercise leadership is in facilitating a return to the liturgical peace that was violently ended by the abrupt and, as we have recently learnt from new evidence, the carefully manipulated, [cf. lying about the “survey results” to justify Taurina cacata] persecution of those, particularly young people, who have discovered the older liturgical rites and who have “felt its attraction and found in it a form of encounter with the Mystery of the Most Holy Eucharist, particularly suited to them” (Benedict XVI, Letter to the Bishops, 7 July 2007).

The Pope has spoken often of his desire for unity, peace and reconciliation. There is no more important area for this than in the worship of the Church. [Liturgy is doctrine.  We are our rites.] But we must be clear: unity does not mean uniformity. The liturgy has always rejoiced in a rich, legitimate diversity, even in the Western rite – as the rites of different religious orders and historic dioceses attest. It is only since the most recent Council that attempts have been made, and recently renewed, to impose a rigid uniformity, falsely appealing to the need for “unity” and “communion”.

Those involved [I think McTeigue would call them the “members of the people who should know better club”] should have learnt in “Theology 101” that these are fundamentally sacramental and theological realities which do not require uniform ritual expression. Proponents of moving on “to the second phase” of liturgical reform know this at least implicitly, but conveniently ignore it in respect of the older rites.

As Supreme Pastor, the Holy Father needs to correct this error and end the Stalinist persecution of the older rites being waged by the Archbishop Secretary of the Dicastery and by certain bishops. This campaign, gleefully presided over by the Cardinal Prefect, has fractured unity and scandalised many good faithful, particularly families, driving them away and forcing them to find solutions at times “outside the system”.

It is hard to see how this is anything other than an ideological campaign by partisans of a particular political liturgical viewpoint, the legitimacy of which is highly questionable. It is certainly not pastoral in the true sense of that word – it does not serve the salvation of souls – and it has given rise to ungodly bitterness on all sides.

The Pope has already given one encouraging sign: his permission for the celebration of Mass in the usus antiquior (the older form) in St Peter’s Basilica by Cardinal Burke for the annual pilgrimage of those who worship according to the older rites. The extraordinarily large numbers at this Mass – around 5,000 when only 1,000 were expected – speak loudly. It is hard to imagine Pope Leo seeking to continue to ban such genuine fervour and devotion.

I doubt the Holy Father will wish to address the issue of the “reform of the liturgical reform” spoken of over a decade ago. [If I read Reid right, I think he is talking about what figures such as Fr. Fessio suggested.  I, respectfully, think that that was a dead end.  On a positive note, it got people better informed about what Sacrosanctum Concilium really said, as well as thinking and talking it.] Those officially “in charge” abhor the mere thought of “correcting” the modern rites in the light of critiques made of their fidelity to the Council itself. And those who celebrate the usus antiquior see little point in any such effort. This minefield may have to wait a little longer before being cleared.

After the Holy Father’s election, our community revived the traditional prayers for the Pope sung during adoration on Sunday after Vespers. [This was also done at The Parish™] Leo XIV is not Benedict XVI, nor is he Francis. But he is the Pope, and as such he needs our fervent prayers that he will teach and govern wisely and prudently, most especially in respect of the Sacred Liturgy, “the summit toward which the activity of the Church is directed …[and] the font from which all her power flows” (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 10).  [fons et culmen]

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
12 Comments

BROOKLYN 25/10 – Day 42: theologically certain

The rising sun illuminated the Borough of Brooklyn today at 6:35, which was 14 minutes earlier than how it had shed its light upon the Rione Regola in Rome.

It will for this Borough set at 16:43 and for the Rione at 16:48.

The Ave Maria Bell should ring at … well… the calendar says 17:30, but that could be wrong.  The old chart I have – and old charts are to be trusted more than those who did the calendar, I think – says that from 4 -20 November the Ave Maria Bell should ring at 17:15.

At The Parish™ it should ring at about 17:18.

Kimchi.  Breakfast of Champions.  Oh yeah… a couple little breakfast sausagey things, not old cigar buts.  I reserve them for special feast days.

Yesterday I teased you with the promise a recording of the Ave Maria Bell at The Parish™ and then I didn’t post it.  My bad.  I apologize to those of you from Columbia Heights who spent a half hour looking for it.  Here it is (you may hear a seagull or two):

It is the Feast of the Four Holy Crowned Martyrs, the “Quatrro Coronati”, who died in 306 and St. Adeodatus, Pope, who died in 618.  It is also the Feast of the Holy Relics, in particular the relics in St. Peter’s, hence, for Rome’s particular calendar, it is the Feast of All ROMAN Saints.

More on this in another post.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – UK HERE  WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

I have to post this…. animi caussa….

White to move and mate in 3. How long did it take you?  Me: 5 seconds.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

So there!

For some thoughts of Fr Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange OP go HERE He thought it was theologically certain. Of course he is not the be all and end all of theology, but he knew more than his prayers!

Buy great beer and help the monks of Norcia.

Posted in Our Solitary Boast |
5 Comments

BROOKLYN 25/10 – Day 41: shopping

Over in Rome the sunrise was at 6:48 and the sunset was at 16:59.

The Ave Maria Bells was supposed to ring for the Curia, but it didn’t.  However, it did ring at The Parish, and this is what it sounded like tonight, replete with seagull accompaniment.

I am not in Rome.  Where I am, the sun rose at 6:32 and set at 16:45.

Ave Maria Be…. well.  No.

It is a 1st Friday.   There are 55 days left in the year.  Advent comes in 23 days.

No, I’m not back at the Campo de’ Fiori.

No, I’m not by Pippo’s flower stand.

Tomorrow night my host and I will have supper with some priests and I am in the galley, not just at the oars at ramming speed (the blog) but at the stove as the cook.

Today we gathered supplies.  We will have, at request, my pasta “al seminario”.   We got this often in seminary in Rome.  It’s simple and there’s never any left unless I make it in mastodontic portions (as I will this time).   Usually I spaghetti with this, but this time it’s rigatoni… easier on shirts.

Every recipe has to begin somewhere.   First, however, sharpened the knife on the bottom rim of a ceramic coffee mug.  Works in a pinch.

Because of the quantity… worked in batches so as not to crowd the pans.

Same here.

San Marzano… carrots… hot red pepper (flakes).


And now it will reduce.   This is for tomorrow.   Sauces seem better the next day.

Tomorrow will bring thick ribeye steaks in clarified butter served with a baked potato and homemade Bearnaise sauce.    I have no idea about wine pairing.   I think it might be a secret.    I forgot about dessert.   Hmmmm….

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – UK HERE  WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

Animi caussa.

And…

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

White mates in 2. How fast did you find it?

And… you don’t have to be a dedicated player to be awestruck by this.

Get stuff for your mom or grandmother… whomever. Get or sell a house … or lot, I guess… building… something… and some money will support a pro-life cause.

Posted in On the road |
3 Comments

Wherein Fr. McDonald challenges Fr. Z

Fr. Allan McDonald has a blog called Southern Orders.

At that blog he issued a “challenge” to me. HERE

Father has taken exception to what I wrote about a homily (homilies) given by Fr. David Carter in Chattanooga about the suppression of the TLM and its replacement with a Novus Ordo Mass with traditional elements.  I took Fr. Carter, a man caught between Scylla and Charybdis, to task for his solution and his tone.  His explanations of his solution sidestep the deeper issue of the difference between the two rites.  I also was hard on him for what I perceived as a tone of condescension toward those who were not going along with the Novus Ordo idea.  NB: I’ll add here that I read what he delivered from the pulpit and that can make a difference.

Father McDonald wrote:

The pastor, Fr. Carter made a promise to his bishop and his successors of obedience. That’s up there with the promise of celibacy, btw!  He has to eliminate the TLM in his parish by the bishop’s decree based upon what the bishop wants or does not want to do in terms of seeking an extension of the TLM in his diocese with the Vatican’s Dycastery [sic] of Divine worship. That’s the bishop’s prerogative, fair or not.

[…]

I applaud Fr. Carter’s pastoral approach to this debacle and I suspect he is working in union with his bishop to make a more traditional model of the Paul VI Mass available to those who love the TLM.

“fair or not”.   Yup.

Two points, with respect.

Firstly, Fr McD is correct to underscore that Fr. Carter has to implement what the bishop ordered for the Basilica.  I fully understand that and I surmise from his (many) words that he has a genuine affection for the traditional rites.   His presentation of what he would implement might have been a bit less … patronizing?… had he simply rested on the fact that the bishop has ordered this.  “Sorry, folks.  My hands are tied.  This is what we are going to have to do… fair or not.” rather than “This is going to be soooo meaningful and you don’t understand that its really better for you.” Going on and on about the reform and the continuity and participation while stressing the more “decorative” liturgical elements (which is what you turn the “prayers at the foot of the altar” into if you tack it onto the Novus Ordo) wears thin.

Fr. McDonald defends the Fr. Carter’s position, noting that as a priest he promised obedience to his bishop, rendering the decision to suppress the TLM less a matter of personal preference and more of duty. He calls for compassion toward pastors caught between diocesan mandates and the liturgical expectations of faithful attached to the TLM.

Compassion: this is an entirely reasonable thing to call for.  Although he said at one point that he agreed with the bishop that this was what they should do, I am genuinely sorry that Fr. Carter was put in this insoluble position the first place.

See also my posts about Moral Injury.   Especially HERE

Returning to Father McDonald’s post, here are his conclusions with my comments:

1. We worship God, not the form of the Mass. Don’t turn the form of the Mass, TLM or Modern into a false god!!!  [A bit of a straw man, Father.  I don’t think people who prefer the TLM are that shallow.  The suggestion of  idolatry is not helpful.]

2. Pope Leo needs to deal with all the problems of the Modern Mass with all its subjectivity of style of celebration which is clericalism on steroids. [He may not see the urgency, since I suspect these issues never came across his desk as a bishop in S. America.  Also, I don’t think we will see anything “big” from him until after the close of the Jubilee, which is keeping him busy with endless audiences, etc.]

3. Pope Leo needs to return to the Summorum Pontificum days and Ecclesia Dei! [I’m not convinced that going back to the terms of Summorum is really the summum bonum.  What I would like to see is an Ordinariate or Prelature.  I doubt that will happen.  Channeling the shade of the late Wm. F. Buckley, I suppose that a return to the terms of Summorum would be the best of the plausible moves.  Even more likely would be a retromarch to the terms of Ecclesia Dei adflicta.  But then we would have the same terrain that brought B16 to issue Summorum.  Hence, the chimera of an Ordinariate.  The worst scenario might be an attempt to pacify the situation by issuing yet another Novus Ordo, a Magis Novus Ordo Missale along the lines of what Fr Carter pieced together: even more options and subjectivity.  An attempt to please all and, thereby, failing to please anyone.]

4. Pope Leo needs to concretize the traditional celebration of the Modern Mass by allowing all TLM Order of the Modern Mass along with all the traditional elements allowed in the Ordinariate’s Missal, Divine Worship–that would take some of the subjectivity out of this option, but not all! [See above.  Plus, it’s not going to happen.]

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, SESSIUNCULA, The Drill, What are they REALLY saying? | Tagged , ,
14 Comments

More pain in Charlotte and Greensburg – IMPORTANT UPDATE

UPDATE: 7 Nov 2025

A commentator, below, wrote:

The Greensburg story might be fake news.
https://thecatholicherald.com/article/diocese-of-greensburg-denies-banning-ad-orientem-for-novus-ordo-masses

And also…

Yeah, I just talked to a representative of the Diocese of Greensburg, and he confirmed that Bishop Koulick has made no restrictions whatsoever on ad orientem Masses, and has no intention of doing so. Somebody was misinformed when they made that post.


Published on: Nov 6, 2025 at 16:01

and…  [UPDATE – the following seems to be FAKE NEWS – FYI the poster of the tweet is associated with LifeSite News.]

 

Posted in Pò sì jiù, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , ,
31 Comments

Wherein Fr. McTeigue has a good idea.

Remember the B as in B, S as in S put out about the TLM recently by the Windy Prelate? HERE

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Save The Liturgy - Save The World |
2 Comments

BROOKLYN 25/10 – Day 40: Still looking homeward

I’m in Brooklyn for a few days before my last leg home.

The mood here seems to be one of pessimistic resignation with anger.

Why?

Meanwhile, one of my last meals in Rome involved…

I’d rather not think of last night’s. Uphill from that.

More later from Brooklyn. Chinese is on the horizon.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment