From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 06-02-25 – Falling into the trap

June 2nd 2025

Dear Diary,

This morning began with Chester triumphantly parading around the house with the TV remote clenched in his jaws like a barbarian trophy… chewing. That’s the fifth one the nasty little thief. One more and I’ll swap him for a rescue cat.

I had to host the meeting of the region bishops, the first since Jack got the sack from Rome through the Noonch. Reason: health. Real reason: financial creativity to the tune of nearly 7 figures. We’re on pins and noodles now because none of us is going to have perfect books. Except maybe Jude.

Jude, yah, always serious except when he’s not. He told us that he finally got permission from Rome under the new Pope!! to merge one of his parishes with a chapel of the SXPX (or something). Matteo almost choked on his danish, Terry went pale. When I asked when it was going to be done, Dozer turned purpler. Jude said it was going smoothly and should be done in a week or so. He said that he was inspired by how I had combined and renamed places and he would do the same. Of course I walked into it. “What did you call it?”, I stupidly asked. Really serious he said, it’s now the My Fault My Fault My Most Grievous Fault Faith Community. That did it, of course. I coudda killed him. Gotta say, he tagged the other guys too. They fell for it at first. I told Fr. Tommy about it and he said it was a great idea that we should actually consider. He even offered to get an SPXS chapel started soz we can merge it. God help me. Sometimes I … if it weren’t for the fact that he’s so efficient and keeps a lot of stuff off my tray table, I’d tell him I’m might need to him to be the vicar over at Jesus Happy Lamb and Friend… Faith Community. Yeah… it does sound kinda stupid come to think of it.  Tommy calls it St Abusiva.  Can’t say he’s wrong.  But thatd fix his fashia for week or so.

Anyway, we bishops and drivers went to Razzo’s for a late lunch. Dozer demolished a plate of gnocchi so fast the waiter crossed himself. He gives me a run for my money.

Posted in Diary of Bp. McButterpants, Lighter fare | Tagged
4 Comments

Pentecost Friday: tearing it up

Pentecost Friday

At NLM there is a great explanation of the Pentecost Roman Stations.

I find these historical details interesting because we find traces of ancient things in the traditional rites even today.

In any event, if I am to be believed, the Pentecost Friday Roman Station is Dodici Apostoli, Twelve Apostles, because that’s where Friday Ember Day Stations are. Believe me.

The texts of the Mass today are rather calming, as befits summery pursuits. Crops are planted. Early harvest of first fruits and grains are in. Other plantings and fruits are maturing. The days are long, warm, languid. There is always something to be done, but there is daylight for leisure.

The reading from Joel is about the harvest, and grain and wine and the gifts of God. The Antiphons and Gradual are all pretty joyful.

The Gospel is about the man whose friends lower him through the roof to get him to Jesus, who heals him. It’s a great moment in the Gospels.

Today in our Collect we have a return of the theme of “the enemy”.

Grant to Your Church, we beseech You, almighty God, that, united by the Holy Spirit, she may in no way be harmed by any assault of the enemy.

But for the most part, the overwhelming attitude of the Mass is joyful contentment with the abundant gifts of God.

Perhaps the idea of the enemy in the Collect, making a disturbance of the peace, is offset by the images of the paralytic man’s friends making a disturbance.  Making a mess, but in a good sense.

Enemies tear houses apart. The man’s friends tore a hole in the roof. Both make disturbances, but with different scopes in mind and different outcomes.

The Postcommunion seems to echo what happened in the Gospel, thus tying our minds in the moment of Communion to the healing, strengthening effects of the Eucharist:

“We who have received the gift of Your Blessed Sacrament, O Lord, humbly pray that what You have taught us to do in commemoration of You, may profit and help us in our weakness.”

As I write, I have a thought of all your priests being the friends who tear a hole in the roof to get you to the Lord. The friends lowered the man. The priests bring the Lord down to you. The fabric of the roof is torn open.

The division of heaven from earth is ripped asunder and Christ is called down, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity.

But we have to turn this sock inside out. Even as this image takes form under my tapping fingers, it is really you lay people who are the ones who get that roof apart and get us priests to the Lord.

You do the heavy… lowering. We would be lost without you, frozen, unable to move.

Thank you for being our stretcher bearers.

And…

Posted in Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
2 Comments

Is this something to worry about?

No.

What is the issue?

I think we all want to see this fellow out of that office, except for perhaps readers of the Fishwrap and most Jesuits.   However, right now I suspect that both he and guys like the leaders of the pogrom against tradition-inclined faithful at the worship office are trying to be as small as possible right now, hiding even their shadows if possible.  They won’t do anything “brave”… not that what they did before was brave.  By definition bullies are not brave.

So Leo says, “For now, everyone, sit there in your chair and be good. I’ll get to you in due time.”

For me a big tell will be whom he chooses to replace himself in the office for Bishops.

“But… but… but Father!”, some of you will sputter, “He has been Pope for some 36(?) whole days!  Why hasn’t he changed everything?!? Is he not really the Pope?   What’s he waiting for??!?”

First, he has to come up with people to replace the one’s he wants to change.   That isn’t going to be easy.   Well… if you are huge iconoclast modernist lib there are lots of people already in high profile places to select from.   But if you are looking for men of the faith… after all these years your pool might be smaller than it was, say, 13 years ago.

And another thing…

He is doing some good things that were held over from the last guy.

I note with interest this item from the Bollettino: dates for the canonization of Pier Giorgio Frassati (together with Carlo Acutis – that will be a full square!) and Bartolo Longo have been set.

Bartolo Longo was the former satanic priest who converted and wrote the material that John Paul II used for the Luminous Mysteries.

Posted in The Drill |
6 Comments

PODCAzT 60: Pentecost customs; St. Ambrose on the dew of the Holy Spirit

Originally Published on: May 16, 2008

Today is Friday in the Octave of Pentecost, or at least it ought to be in in the Novus Ordo as it is in the older, Traditional Roman Calendar.

[NB: Yesterday I forgot to embed the player… duh!  It’s there now – HERE]

This is the fifth PODCAzT for the Pentecost Octave. 

Today we will look at some customs associated with Pentecost, very beautiful.  These customs informed the rhythm of people’s lives for centuries.

Then we will drill into the image of the dew of the Holy Spirit (which some bishops sadly think people are too thick to understand and therefore want to eliminate the image from liturgical translations…).  To help we enlist the help of a very wise Bishop, the great Ambrose of Milan (+397) who always tried to explain hard things to his people rather than make them out to be too stupid to get the point.  Ambrose wrote a work On the Holy Spirit in which he explains the dew that descended on Gideon’s fleece in the Book of Judges.  So, we will hear Judges 6 and 7 and then Ambrose allegorical commentary.  Fascinating stuff, I can tell you.

This reading from Scripture and the patristic commentary, gives you a sense of how some of the Father’s worked with Scripture and how their reflections can be useful for us today.

Of course, I have lots of comments along the way.

For music,
we have an antiphon for Pentecost in Gregorian chant, and a bitter sweet song Dancing at Whitsun, a folk song, which speaks of the rhythm of our lives and the challenges we endure.  There is a Fantasia super Kom, Heiliger Geist BWV 651 by J.S. Bach on the pipe organ, which Holy Church recommends above all other instruments.  We hear a haunting Byzantine Communion for mid-Pentecost, in other words this very week and at the end a real change of pace, which you can listen to yourselves.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, PODCAzT | Tagged
Comments Off on PODCAzT 60: Pentecost customs; St. Ambrose on the dew of the Holy Spirit

SSPX: Habemus Papam! Pray or Speculate?

Pope Leo XIV has now been in office some 36… 37 days?

He seems to be moving at a careful and deliberate pace.  However, I am struck by perhaps coincidental facts which could be more than mere coincidences.  For example, on the day that Card Roche, known for his pogrom of contempt against those who desire the traditional Roman Rite, had his first audience in months, the exuberant suppressor Bp. Martin mitigated his plans to axe the TLM as did also Bishop Gruss of Saginaw.  I note with satisfaction that Paglia is no longer involved with anything except his fresco in Terni.  I saw a video in which a seemingly aggressive Card. Marx managed to try Leo’s patience after the Wednesday audience.

We shall see is what I have been saying.  Let the man have some time.

I was sent this.  It is a pretty good statement.  From the newsletter of the SSPX:  HERE

Habemus Papam! Pray or Speculate?

American Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, OSA, was elected Pope on May 8, 2025. He took the name Leo XIV. The following is a reflection by Fr. Alain Lorans, SSPX.

Since then, “express biographies” have multiplied, with journalists writing books in three days to discuss the newly elected Pope while hoping for great editorial success. In reality, people are engaging in conjecture, surmising, and speculation.

For our part, we prefer to await the actions of the Sovereign Pontiff. This is not in a sterile wait-and-see attitude, but rather in prayerful expectation, as the liturgy invites us to do:

“O Lord, with suppliant humility we entreat Thee, that in Thy boundless mercy Thou wouldst grant the most holy Roman Church a pontiff, who, by his zeal for us, may be pleasing to Thee, and by his good government may ever be honored by Thy people for the glory of Thy name” (Collect of the Mass for the Election of a Pope).

Yes, let us pray to Our Lord that “we may rejoice in a pontiff pleasing to Thy majesty, and presiding over the government of holy mother Church” (Secret).

Let us urge God to “grant us a pontiff who shall instruct Thy people by his virtues and fill the souls of the faithful with spiritual fragrance” (Postcommunion).

This is the wisdom of the traditional liturgy, which stands far above conjecture, supposition, and other sorts of speculation.

And when the acts of the new Pope come, it is this wisdom that will guide our judgment with complete certainty. We will look for a pontiff “who shall instruct Thy people by his virtues and fill the souls of the faithful with spiritual fragrance.”

It is in this higher light that we will be able to know supernaturally whether God has granted us a pope who “by his zeal for us, may be pleasing to Thee, and by his good government may ever be honored by Thy people for the glory of Thy name.”

(Source : NDC, n°213 – FSSPX.Actualités)

Seems like a reasonable approach.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Leo XIV, SSPX |
1 Comment

OLDIE PODCAzT 59: St Leo the Great on Pentecost fasting; Benedict XVI’s Pentecost sermon – UPDATED

Here is an OLDIE PODCAzT from 2008

___

Today is Thursday in the Octave of Pentecost, or at least it ought to be in in the Novus Ordo as it is in the older, Traditional Roman Calendar.

This is the fourth PODCAzT for the Pentecost Octave.

Today we learn what St. Leo the Great (+461) thought about the fasting Christians should engage in after Pentecost, in other words on the Wednesday, Friday and Saturday of this very week!  These are our Ember Day’s those beautiful days which helped Catholics for may centuries regulate the rhythm of their lives in the consecration of the seasons of the year, and learn to use God’s creation with moderation.  Leo has a fascinating insight about how we cannot truly be Christians, in a deeper sense, without fasting and almsgiving.  These two necessary practices, shape in inner man in WisdomSapientia.

Then we hear the Pentecost sermon of Pope Benedict XVI, [once] gloriously reigning.  He speaks about the diversity of our Church which must, as a necessary characteristic have unity, without which a group cannot truly be called a Church.  This has ecumenical implications, bet on it!

Of course, I have lots of comments along the way.

For music,
there is a festive paschal Alleluia from the Cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris, just to remind us of the connection of Easter and Pentecost.  We have some Gregorian chant from the Monastery of Sant’Antimo is Tuscany, an Alleluia: Veni Sancte Spiritus and also the Sequence Veni Sancte Spiritus, which is one of my very favorite of all the chants of the year.  Also, there is a text of Hildegard von Bingen, an O Sapientia.  Moreover, Thomas Tallis‘s Loquebantur variis linguis helps us stay focused on what this Octave is about.

Finally, we have a prayer invoking the help of the Holy Spirit, appropriate in this Octave of Pentecost.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Relief. Pope Leo XIV addressed the clergy of Rome… cordially.

For the last month and change, one of the most frequent observations I’ve heard from people is that its funny how we are so happy just to have something like normalcy.  The most frequent word I’ve heard in Rome and in these USA, from clergy and laity, Catholics and even non-Catholics is “relief”.  One person likened it to the feeling when a migraine ends.  Another said it is like the fall of the Berlin Wall.

A priest friend alerted me to an address that Pope Leo XIV gave to the clergy of the diocese of Rome.   HERE

Leo starts out with praise and thanks and friendship…. instead of the ritual, eventually predictable verbal abuse and obvious contempt we heard for so many years.

[…]

I wished to meet you to get to know you personally, and to begin walking with you. I thank you for your life given in the service of the Kingdom, for your daily labours, for your great generosity in the exercise of your ministry, for everything you live in silence and that is at times accompanied by suffering or misunderstanding. You carry out different services, but you are all precious in the eyes of God and in the fulfilment of his plan.

[…]

What a relief.

I would have liked some comment on priesthood and sacred liturgical worship.  Leo’s emphasis was more on cultural context and concern for the poor.  There’s nothing wrong with that and there is time for more.  One cannot express every possible thing in a short address and he has only been 35 days since his election.

That said… what a relief.   It is nice to have “normal”.

UPDATE:

Posted in Leo XIV, Mail from priests, Priests and Priesthood |
6 Comments

Pentecost Thursday: No Joy in Mudville for Dustman.

Pentecost Thursday.

The Roman Station is St. Lawrence outside the walls, which is where it was in the Easter Octave on Wednesday.

In the Gospel from Luke 9, Jesus sends the Apostles out with authority to heal and cast out demons. In the Epistle from Acts 8, Deacon Philip is in Samaria doing the same.

For the rest, the remaining Mass Propers are like those of Pentecost Sunday.

I note in the Epistle, “And the crowds with one accord gave heed to what was said by Philip… So there was great joy in that city.”

I note in the Gospel, “And whatever house you enter, stay there, and do not depart from thence. And whosoever will not receive you – go forth from that town, and shake off even the dust from your feet for a witness against them.”

A common thread here is docility and acceptance of the Good News.

Where there is acceptance there is healing.

Where there is not, there is no joy in “dustville“.

The Lord Himself established the attitude that the Apostles (bishops and priests today?) should have.

In Latin, “étiam púlverem pedum vestrórum excútite in testimónium supra illos“. The Greek says, “kai koniortos“. In Greek, kai is a conjunction, a copulative like “and”.   It is also a form of karate associated with a particular kind of snake practiced in the Receda area of L.A. where the vampires pass by on Ventura Boulevard. Sometimes I just want to see if anyone really reads this stuff.  However, kai, the Greek particle, not the karate, can also lend greater force to what follows, which is how we get that Latin etiam that comes into English as ” don’t just leave that town but even shake the dust off your feet”. Leave it and forget it and the dust – whence all of them were made and to which they will return – will remain there as a reminder of what they lost: life, joy.

I am compelled to digress a little about “dust”. I could have entitled this “No Joy in Mudville” also. In Hebrew, the Genesis 2:7 verse that describes God creating man from dust reads (phonetically) “vayitser Adonai et ha-adam ‘afar min ha-adamah … then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground (RSV)”. The Hebrew word for dust used here, “afar”. It can also refer to clay, mud, or ashes. The name “Adam” is from the Hebrew word “adamah… ground”. Also, just to be entirely pedantic, that Hebrew more precisely reads something like “God formed dust man”.  If there are “super heroes” maybe we are mostly “under heroes” beginning with “Dustman”!

That places man in a tension between the lowliness of earth and the heights of Heaven.

However, when dust is in the picture, something is up. Or rather, down.

This points to consequences for all of us when we reject something from God.

What pops into my mind is the rejection of a vocation.

For example, say someone has a vocation to marry, but… won’t. That person will be restless. Say someone doesn’t have the vocation to marry, but… does… and then abandons the marriage. Sorry, can’t do that.

Say the same about religious life or about priesthood.

Yes yes, there are ways to deal with “being in the wrong place”.

In canon law there is acknowledgement that marriages at times don’t work. The innocent one of the couple could in, for example, cases of infidelity, adultery, seek a separation from the other (not divorce, mind you).  Canon Law even states that the bishop can be involved in this decision.  This can be misunderstood by the poorly informed as asking a bishop to grant something so there can be a civil divorce, which clearly is a misunderstanding of the law: bishops aren’t going to be involved in divorces. Or they shouldn’t be. Similarly, there are paths for clerics to be relieved of the obligations of the clerical state.

However, both of these are exceptions and exceptions are … well… exceptions. They, by definition, are not the norm.

In most cases the better path forward is to bear the crosses that flow from the obligations one has chosen, that come from choosing that fork in the road rather than the other, and apply oneself with humble perseverance for the sake of saving one’s soul.

Life is short and eternity is long.

This pretty much flies in the face of the squishy messaging in certain documents with infamous footnotes that present the hard aspects of vocations as nearly impossible “ideals” that no one can be expected to be able to reach. Hence, there ought to be even greater and multiple paths “out” of whatever hard situation one finds oneself in.  It’s a manifestation, I think, of a Christian-lite, one without the Cross, and maybe a dose of … wokey confusion about reality.  However, recently our new Pope Leo XIV subtly walked back that wokey corrosive ambiguity fostered over the last dozen or so years when he stated that marriage is “not an ideal but the measure of true love between a man and a woman”.

It is an aspect of fallen human nature to tend toward the easy path and to avoid the crosses life brings. We should be wary of this tendency. I do NOT mean that must always choose the way of greater suffering. But I think it is good to double-check oneself, even to consult, to determine what God wants.

Going back to Luke 9, when the Lord sent the Apostles out with His authority, He also told them not to take those things along by which they could possibly make a living or easily obtain creature comfort: they were to rely only on “the sending” … which was from Jesus alone. That probably entailed hunger and thirst during their mission. Not to mention anxiety and danger.

It was a harder path. But it was one which brought them their joy later.

It also provided an opportunity for people to be generous to the Apostles, in gratitude for their instruction, healing and the life of freedom as children of God.

Posted in Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
10 Comments

ASK FATHER: Communion services simply because the priest is away?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR … sort of… there is am implied question:

It all started when I tried to go to a noon Mass today at the liberal parish you have showcased before (the old pastor retired but the new guy is a “get along” guy) and there was a sign in front saying “No Daily Mass This Week.” A large woman in a sleeveless top and shorts (I think she’s a “pastoral associate”) was coming out and waved at me, “I need to turn the sign around. We’re having a Communion Service.” I then continued through the parking lot, made my exit, and headed back to safety. She turned around on her way back and watched me drive away. She looked puzzled.

Are there no diocesan guidelines?

They have announced Communion Services all three days that he normally offers Mass (T-Th). Nothing Monday or Friday since he does not offer Mass on those days.

This suggests a thought pattern of equivalency.  [There it is!]

The bigger issue of course is the availability of several Masses within 15 minutes rendering such “emergency sacramental rations” unnecessary.

I wonder what that guy you wrote about last week would do since he abhors going to the tabernacle for “leftovers”.

On that last point, no kidding!

Several things might be good to review.

Over the past several decades, the Holy See has issued precise instructions regarding the use of Communion services in the Novus Ordo.

1. Redemptionis Sacramentum of 2004 from the Congregation for Divine Worship

165: “It is necessary to avoid any confusion between this type of gathering and the celebration of the Eucharist. The diocesan Bishop should give careful consideration to the appropriateness of such celebrations in the absence of a priest and should issue specific norms for the diocese in this regard.”

166: “The diocesan Bishop must not easily grant permission for such celebrations to be held on Sundays and holy days of obligation, especially in places where it is possible or would be possible to have the celebration of Mass.”

167: “It is preferable that the faithful participate in celebrations of the Word of God rather than in celebrations during which Holy Communion is distributed by extraordinary ministers.”

Hence, in suburban or urban areas with multiple parishes, Communion services should not be used simply because the local priest is away. The faithful should be encouraged to attend Mass elsewhere, even if that means adjusting their daily routine.

There’s more…

2. Ecclesiae de Mysterio of 1997 – Interdicasterial Instruction

Art 7.2: “The habitual use of these services on weekdays, especially in places where it is possible to attend Mass, must be avoided.”

Pretty clear. The habitual Communion services in populated areas are to be avoided. This is not a matter of personal preference or parish tradition. Tt is a matter of liturgical fidelity and Eucharistic coherence.

What about this?

3. Directory for Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest of 1988.

18: “A Celebration of the Word with distribution of Holy Communion is not to be equated with the celebration of the Eucharist. Care must be taken not to create confusion or to promote an attitude of indifference toward the Sunday Mass.”

While focused on Sundays, this provides foundational principles that apply to weekdays.

The point: Don’t foster a mindset that receiving Communion is interchangeable with attending the Sacrifice of the Mass.

When Holy Communion becomes something we expect or demand, there is a risk of turning the sacrament into a self-affirming commodity rather than a transforming mystery.

Communion without the Mass is not the same. The Church does not treat it as equivalent and neither should we.  That said, there is no rule that people MUST receive Communion at every Mass.  Most people, I suspect, shouldn’t be going at all given that they probably haven’t been to confession for who knows how many years.

If this is manifestly violated where you are, you should inform the local bishop.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
6 Comments

Pentecost Wednesday: Peter’s shadow

Pentecost Wednesday: Ember Day

Another Octave ramble which might have a couple of surprises.

Back in the day, 5th c or so, Pentecost was enriched with an Octave, thus extending the festal character of the great feast. For a while they were bumped.

In the 11th c. St. Pope Gregory VII, Hildebrand, reinstated them while keeping the festive tone of the Octave.

If the Octave of Pentecost can be abolished for the Novus Ordo calendar, it can be reinstated, just as John Paul II reinstated “Prayers over the people” during Lent.

If the Ember Days can be de facto suppressed through lack of interest and ignorance, they can be reinstated through education and pursuit.

Consider what Gregory VII’s approach to “Eucharistic consistency” (or is it “Eucharistic coherence”…)  might be.

Consider what Gregory VII would do about prelates who waffle on morals, who do nothing about schlock worship, etc.

Today’s Roman Station is St. Mary Major, the place traditionally for scrutinies of candidates for ordination.  Ember Saturdays were traditionally days for ordinations.

If I had my way, we would call some back for scrutinies!  In my day in Rome, before ordination to the diaconate and to the priesthood we had pretty thorough “scrutinies”.  We went around a big room from table to where there was a priest/bishop scrutineer who would interrogate us about the material of which he was an expert.  These guys were usually professors from the Pontifical Universities.

Because this is an Ember Day, we have, first, two readings from Acts 2 and Acts 5, with a “Flectamus genua” for good measure, and then a Gospel pericope from the Bread of Life discourse in John 6.

Acts 2 relates the descent of the Holy Spirit and then Peter’s preaching with the conversion of many. Peter talks about the wonders people will see.

Acts 5 opens with the sad case of Ananias and Sapphira. Later the Apostles are imprisoned, but angels let them out. When the big shots started to freak out, Gamaliel counseled patience to see if what the Apostles were doing was from God. In this reading, the Apostles work many signs, many cures. Even Peter’s shadow cured. Many believed.

A few points spring to mind, in no special order.

First, Gamaliel counseled patience.  If what the Apostles were doing was from God, it would endure and produce good things.  If it was not, that would become clear.

Would that today our Whatevers High Atop The Thing would have even a hair’s breadth of such wise patience when it comes to something that really doesn’t need to prove itself because it already had a track record of centuries.

The Vetus Ordo has a track record and the Novus Ordo does not.  Rather, the Novus Ordo’s incipient track record isn’t that impressive.

Ratzinger said, way back in the day, and I’ve been saying this for decades, that the two rites (that’s what they are, let’s not kid ourselves) should be freely offered in the best way, most faithful way possible, side by side.  People will show us the way forward.

But … progressivists, you see, the catholic Left, liberals (from the Latin “free”, meaning for a liberal you are only “free” to agree with liberals), are afraid of freedom when it comes to that which stands as a bulwark against erosion of doctrine and – wait for it – morals.  There is nothing to fear from the Vetus Ordo and the people who want it, unless, that is, you fear large, happy, devout families with many children who participate in the life of the Church, which they love.

Second, Peter’s shadow healed.   This struck me as I said Mass in the presence of relics.

The association with holiness, and with the mediated power of Christ, is so mighty that it can effect miracles of healing.  A part of a saint’s body or a possession that was a often used and decorous (such as clothing, a writing pen, a holy image or book, a rosary or chalice), and appropriate object which come into contact with them, are considered relics.  Miracles can be effected through them.  Peter’s shadow healed!

The power of mediation should ever be in our minds.  John was the voice and Christ the Word.  “He who hears you hears me”.  “Whose sins you forgive, they are forgiven…”.  The priest says, in persons Christi, “This is my Body…”.

Next, Peter’s shadow healed because of his association with and commissioning by the Lord, Light from Light.  It is vitally – in the literal sense of that word – important to stay close to the Light source.   Holy Church is a Light house for us, as well as the Barque it directs.  The farther we get from the light source, the weaker it gets and and fuzzier the shadow or beam.  TRADITION keeps us close to the light source.   Hence, Tradidi quod et accepi. 

To attack Tradition is to attack Christ and His Church.  It is suicidal to attack within the Church those who are attracted to Church’s Tradition.

In addition, the Mass texts today shift to different themes. Pentecost and Monday and Tuesday (before Ember Days) all contained protection from harm by the enemy.

Something about the Descent of the Spirit has always twitched at my mind. Acts 2:1 says “they were all together in one place”. But there were quite a few believers at the time, at least 120. All in one place? The upper room wasn’t big enough. BUT… this is the Feast of Weeks, Shavuot!

They were not in the Upper Room.  They were in the TEMPLE.

Males were to go to the Temple for the Shavuot – Pentecost – spring harvest festival celebration involving the wave offerings in the Temple of the harvest fruits, loaves baked from the first sheaves.  The Temple was certainly “big enough” for all the disciples.  And that is where they were!   Acts 2:2 says a wind came (the Holy Spirit) and “filled the house”, Greek oikos. Oikos can be house, of course, but it can also mean any building, including the Temple, the house of God (Matthew 21:13; Mark 11:17; Luke 19:46; John 2:16f, (Isaiah 56:5, 7); cf. Luke 11:51; Acts 7:47, 49).

Remember what we read at the end of Luke 24:50-53 and the account of the Ascension of the Lord?

Then [Jesus] led them out as far as Bethany, and lifting up his hands he blessed them. While he blessed them, he parted from them, and was carried up into heaven. And they returned to Jerusalem with great joy, and were continually in the temple blessing God.

They were continually in the Temple. Why? Among other reasons, Shavuot. When Acts says they were in the “house”, they were in the Temple.  Jewish festivals looked back to historical events and they looked forward to something yet to be fulfilled.  Shavuot looked back to the descent of God on the mountain in the fiery presence cloud, shekinah, when God gave the Decalogue, the Ten Commandments.  Shavuot looked forward to the return of the fiery “presence cloud” to the Temple which had departed with the destruction of the first Temple.  That’s Pentecost: Shavuot fulfilled.  The first fruits this time being the 3000 baptized.

What happens after the mighty wind and tongues of fire? A huge crowd hears Peter’s sermon. Where was that? In the Temple. When did it take place? At 9:00 in the morning. Remember the line about drunkenness?

This was the 3rd hour of the morning and the time of the tamid, the sacrifice of the first of the two daily lambs.

To baptize all those people they would have needed a place with a lot of water. There was such a place nearby, pools for ritual cleansing before going to the Temple.

I am reminded of Ezekiel 6:26:

“A new heart I will give you, and a new spirit I will put within you; and I will take out of your flesh the heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh.”

A new SPIRIT I will put within you. I will take away this TEMPLE of STONE and give you a TEMPLE of FLESH.

This took place in the Temple which lost the glory cloud of fire of the presence of God. The presence of God as fire returns and settles not in the Holy Holies where the Ark was, but rather on the New Ark, Mary and on the Apostles and, through baptism in the hearts of the new believers, new Temples of the Holy Spirit.

In the Introit of today’s Mass we pray: “O God, when You went forth at the head of Your people, making a passage for them, dwelling in their midst…” A reference to the fire cloud that led the people.

In the Collect we pray something that echoes that image of the guiding freedom-bringing fire: “May the Paraclete Who proceeds from You, enlighten our minds, we beseech You, O Lord, and guide us to all truth, as Your Son has promised.”

In the Second Collect, remember it is an Ember Day with two first readings, we get this. See if it doesn’t bind together my thoughts, above:

Grant, we beseech You, almighty and most merciful God, that the Holy Spirit may come to dwell in us, graciously making us a temple of His glory.

Posted in Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
6 Comments